User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive 18
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Toa Nidhiki05. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Hello! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2021 on the behalf of Christmas task force of WikiProject Holidays.
|
Happy holidays!
You can do!
|
Recent...
|
 |
_(5247428631).jpg) |
 |
Quotations related to Calvin Coolidge at Wikiquote--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Have a Happy Holidays!
CaptainGalaxy is wishing you a Merry Christmas (quite possibly a White Christmas).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 16:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CaptainGalaxy 00:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Just notifying you that Super Paper Mario, one of the final major steps towards a Paper Mario GT, has been nominated for good article status. Unlike the other two, I didn't have to do much to get it to this point (you've done basically half [1]), and I won't take much credit for this. Panini🥪 14:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Very cool, thanks for letting me know - happy to share credit! You're doing great work. Toa Nidhiki05 16:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| nice Sillygoose762 (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of 2016 Camellia Bowl
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 Camellia Bowl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlabamaFan101 -- AlabamaFan101 (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
About SB Nation sources
Hi Toa Nidhiki05, SB Nation may not be a bad source but I think there are better sources than SB Nation such as Detroit News. If you insist on keeping the SB Nation sources, feel free to do so. You have did a great job with the article, and therefore, I will pass it as a GA-article. --AlabamaFan101 (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2016 Camellia Bowl
The article 2016 Camellia Bowl you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2016 Camellia Bowl for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlabamaFan101 -- AlabamaFan101 (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The Green Bay Packers Won a Total of Eleven Titles,
What is your problem with Accuracy, truth, in this topic ??????
The Green Bay Packers Won a Total of Eleven Titles, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisconsingary (talk • contribs) 02:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2016 Camellia Bowl
The article 2016 Camellia Bowl you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 Camellia Bowl for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2016 Camellia Bowl
The article 2016 Camellia Bowl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2016 Camellia Bowl for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
Tables for election articles
Thanks for taking care of those pesky tables! I've been trying to take care of them but received a lot of pushback from other users, including the original user who advocated for them, so I gave up. I'd like to turn your attention to the articles that still have those tables:
- 2020–21 United States Senate election in Georgia
- 2020–21 United States Senate special election in Georgia
- 2021 Ohio's 11th congressional district special election
- 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial election
- 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election
- 2021 Virginia lieutenant gubernatorial election
- 2021 Anchorage mayoral election
- 2021 Boston mayoral election
- 2021 Cincinnati mayoral election
- 2021 New York City mayoral election
- 2021 Seattle mayoral election
- 2022 Los Angeles mayoral election
That's all I could find. The tables seem limited to races that are to be held in 2021 and 2022, but I don't know if they're being expanded to other elections held pre-2021. Again, thanks! Love of Corey (talk) 06:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
2022 North Carolina Senate Race
The source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-lara-senate-north-carolina-b1816787.html quotes Lindsay Graham as saying "If she runs, I certainly will be behind her, because I think she represents the future of the Republican Party." referring to Lara Trump. What part of this is contradictory to Wikipedia:Endorsements? It seems to meet all criterion of an endorsement. Anish631 (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Anish631
- One, she's not a candidate. Two, saying you'd support someone hypothetically in the future isn't an endorsement. Is he talking primary or general, for example? Toa Nidhiki05 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Recent reversion at SWLJ
Just a heads up I restored a few valid changes I made that you reverted, likely by accident. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I've reviewed the above nomination. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Your GA nomination of Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. It's a week shy of exactly a year, but there were some changes to the scope of WP:ARBAP2 that I don't know you know about.
Blocked
You and IR2017 have been blocked for one week from New Democrat Coalition, Blue Dog Coalition and Republican Governance Group due to edit warring. Use the talk pages. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Good deal. Did you revert to the previous consensus version, before the editing war began? CambridgeBayWeather Toa Nidhiki05 16:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- No because I don't know which is the correct version. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- The original versions:
- No because I don't know which is the correct version. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- The section in question is “See Also”. If you wanted you could just copy the old version to the current page edit. I am fine with the temporary block because it forces him to go to the talk, I just think per WP:BRD the page should not have the contested edit in the interim. CambridgeBayWeather Toa Nidhiki05 19:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- You could use the talk page and ask if others agree. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:12, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have. Other editors on those pages reverted back as well. It’s not a matter of agreement. That’s the original version that the dispute is over. Since when do we allow contested edits to remain while discussion is ongoing. Toa Nidhiki05 19:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- You could use the talk page and ask if others agree. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:12, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 May newsletter
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
- The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
- Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
- Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
- Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
- Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
- Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.- Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
template on 2004 United States election voting controversies
Would you mind detailing what you think the fringe issues are on 2004 United States election voting controversies. For reference, diff. Bonewah (talk) 15:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- A slew of unfounded conspiracy theories about voting machines and exit polling that have been repeatedly refuted by reliable sources. Toa Nidhiki05 15:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific and do so on the article's talk page? Bonewah (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa
The article Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa
The article Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 10:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mata Nui Online Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episodic.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Exchange reviews?
Just nominated Judgment (video game) to GA and saw your nominated of Bionicle: Matoran Adventures. Are you interested in exchanging reviews? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah I think that would work Tintor2! 17:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Awkward source
Hi. I did a quick search for anything that might substantiate the assumption that content was cut from the 2003 Bionicle monstr-ahem, game. I found this post from someone working with the BIoMedia project who got into contact with a number of Argonaut staff, and includes some juicy details about its production (original concept, team history, engine info, production problems). The problem is it's from Tumblr, which is traditionally inadmissible as a source. I don't feel comfortable adding it to the source suggestions page of the article, but I thought I'd leave it here. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Funnily enough, ProtoDrake, I’m quite familiar with them and have stumbled upon their source. It’s public knowledge at this point that the game was developed last-minute and half the levels were cut - but sadly a RS has never reported it and I’m not sure an argonaut employee has ever publicly said this under their real name. It’s very unfortunate. Toa Nidhiki05 10:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bionicle Heroes
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bionicle Heroes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 13:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bionicle (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D video game.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bionicle Heroes
The article Bionicle Heroes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bionicle Heroes for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 14:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bionicle Heroes
The article Bionicle Heroes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bionicle Heroes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Even though Steny Hoyer has the title of House Majority Leader, since he is second in rank he does not belong in the leadership spot, if we were to include second ranking people, then we would have to add Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin as well. Moreover when people talk about democratic leaders in congress they always refer to the top democrat in the House and top democrat in the Senate(Pelosi and Schumer). Also, House Majority leader hasn't been included in this article going back years. Therefore he should be removed. So please do not add him.Uzenaes (talk) 13:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- I don't want to nag you, but it's obviously been a while since you got this. Bishonen | tålk 19:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC).
American football video games to GA
Can you bring American football video games to GA? Longplay Watcher (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
RFC
Given the current controversy, I guess if you really wanted the RFC to move forward, you could open it yourself. No pressure from me though, you should do what you want. Benevolent human (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bionicle (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bionicle (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheTechnician27 -- TheTechnician27 (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[Cindy Hyde-Smith
Rather than edit-warring at Cindy Hyde-Smith, please explain yourself in a discussion on the talk page. I will place similar notices on other involved editors talk pages. Jacona (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Jacona: Toa Nidhiki05 is entirely correct here. Is Hyde-Smith a white supremacist? 100% (in my opinion, an opinion which does not necessarily reflect that of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or anyone besides myself affiliated thereto). However, lines like: "It is unclear whether Hyde-Smith was demonstrating allegiance to the Confederate States of America. She also has not disclosed her position on treason or crimes against the United States," are unequivocally inappropriate in the prose of an article in Wikipedia's voice. Furthermore, the onus is on the editor(s) including new material to discuss it on the talk page should their edit be reverted, not vice versa. Toa does not need to "explain themself in a discussion on the talk page." TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bionicle (video game)
The article Bionicle (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Bionicle (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheTechnician27 -- TheTechnician27 (talk) 20:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Video Game Barnstar | |
| For your elevation of Bionicle, Bionicle: Matoran Adventures, Lego Bionicle: Quest for the Toa, Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui, and Bionicle Heroes to Good Article status. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
Also, I was looking for a WikiProject Lego barnstar right as I saw your notification on my talk page. Someone really ought to make one of those. Either way, you deserved one a loooong time ago, given you seem to have had a hand in literally every Bionicle GA promotion, or at least the video games. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! ProtoDrake got the one for Mask of Light, but the others are all mine as far as I know and there's only one off from having a complete "good article" set for the video games! Toa Nidhiki05 21:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
WikiCup 2021 July newsletter
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
- The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
- Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
- Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
- Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
- Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
2022 North Carolina Senate Race
I am asking you to please stop undoing my edits when I corrected my initial mistake. You even took out somebody elses edit.
If you see something that does not look right go over it and fix what is wrong. Do not reverse entire edits.
-Michael usfg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael usfg (talk • contribs) 21:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mata Nui Online Game
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mata Nui Online Game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Npthura -- Npthura (talk) 01:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina
Can you please post an explanation of why you've been repeatedly reverting what appears to be sourced material for endorsements of a declared candidate? Am I missing something? OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mata Nui Online Game
The article Mata Nui Online Game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mata Nui Online Game for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Npthura -- Npthura (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiber Optic Sensing Association has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
—Danre98(talk^contribs) 15:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 
The Rambling Man and 
Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being 
Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild, 
Lee Vilenski, 
BennyOnTheLoose, 
Amakuru and 
Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. .jpg){kind=small}
Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)