Making unnecessary heading changes edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I too have noticed that virtually all of your edits have been immediately undone. Some unnecessary, others adding outright errors (changing "videos" to "YouTube Videos" when there were non-YouTube videos present.
Please take more care with your edits. Spend more time making sure they're correct and necessary. Sergecross73 msg me 13:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Last warning for making unnecessary and innacurrate changes edit

  Not all of the video listed are Youtube videos. If you making a pointless heading change again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I'LL NEVER CHANGE TO "YouTube Videos" Ever Again, How About "Web Videos and Series" SuperMario6467 (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
No. The heading is fine as it is. It does not need that extra level of specificity. This also goes for the Super Mario 128 article. Stop adding "Super Mario 64-2" to the leading paragraph. ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I won't add it again. SuperMario6467 (talk) 00:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
In addition, stop adding information about the third trailer to The Super Mario Bros. Movie, and without a source to boot. There is already consensus not to include it. This is a pattern we keep seeing-- you keep trying to re-introduce the same changes into articles after it's been reverted, multiple times, with the same exact edit summary. If you see that your edit been removed before, maybe that's a clue that it shouldn't be there. Try engaging with other editors on the articles' talk pages first instead of trying to re-adding it and hoping it sticks after the 4th or 5th time. ThomasO1989 (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sergecross73 msg me 12:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Supra Mayro 64 edit

  Hello, SuperMario6467. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Supra Mayro 64, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply