Supaman89

Click here to leave me a new message.

Mexico Hospital

I am wondering if you were all right with me putting the image of the hospital juarez de mexico back in. it is definetly not a fancy hospital (i've been inside five times) it simply has an interesting architecture style on the outside of the west building, this does not make it a fancy hospital hospital. it definately is not a fancy hospital it just looks nice in fact before it was remodeled it looked quiete plain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veertlte (talk • contribs) 05:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Flagicons in infoboxes

I have reverted the flagicon you added to Maite Perroni's infobox. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons) before adding any more flagicons to infoboxes. In particular please pay close attention to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons)#Not for use in locations of birth and death. Aspects (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I am curious how you define if the article is overloaded. I nor anyone else I contact has had any problem loading it, and many articles such as south korea have many pictures without causing any problems. I don't believe that the number of pictures on this article is a detriment in any way and the whole point of wikipedia is to show people encyclopedic facts mainly through text but, also through images i have also noticed however that you have corrected some inacurate facts which i thank you for but, could you please leave the images up or at least discuss what you are planning to i am going to revert the previous images back but i will put back your corrections as these corrections that you inserted are neccessarry - thank you

¡Estoy en mi camino a la luna en un cohete hecho de queso! Lo siento soy una persona muy raro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veertlte (talk • contribs) 05:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Images on Mexico

I completely understand what you mean but the reason that the article says it is overloaded is because it is the way the wikipedia system works. Once an article gets over 80 kilobytes in size an automated system makes message come up saying that the article MAY be to long and that it might be apropriate to split up the article. to reach this 80 Kilobyte goal about half of the Mexico article including half the text would have to be removed and it would then be impossible to accurately represent Mexico. Many articles are over this limit and this does not mean that they are breaking size rules but it means that it may be appropriate to devide this article if it is practical. and just as a side note all of the images in this article only take up 5 kilobytes out of the articles 124 kilobytes because the wikipedia servers do not save the information of the picture on to the article but save the information link to the image. So getting rid of images would not raelly solve the overloading problem anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veertlte (talk • contribs) 04:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Mexican maps

Can you please stop removing national locator pin maps from Mexican cities please and adding municipal maps in its place. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep, but remember many editors are clueless about Mexican states and it makes it more difficult for them to picture where it is in Mexico. Most people know where California and many of the other states in America are. The municipal maps are being use in the municipality articles anyway... Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 20:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

It not the state location that concerns me. Articles on Mexican towns should have two maps. One showing where the town is in Mexico and the other, the dot where it is located within a municipality of a state. This would seemingly cover it all, but what my problem was, was that I had seen you also adding a redundant general state map in Mexico or a map of the municipality where was unecessary, particularly at the expense of the national map. If you keot the national pin map and just added the dot state map I would be perfectly happy. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree. That is the bias of wikipedia though isn't it that for countries like US, Canada and UK we are "expected" to know where the states or counties are. Personally I think most of US place infoboxes look a mess and make it quite difficult sometimes to pinpoint and picture it. From a neutral world view two maps, one which show location in country and another which shows location in a county of a state is perfect I think. Anyway the most important thing is that we get these missing municipalities for Mexico up and running. I would be extremely grateful if you could help built the templates here in the way that Template:Chihuahua has been done so we can begin to complete it. I created them all earlier but from Coahuila downwards they ar eempty at present and haven't been formatted. All we need to do is to copy the municipalities/seat towns from the Municipalities of Mexico list by state and we should make a lot of progress. Use Template:Chihuahua as a guideline to style. Sorry to bite at you, but as you can see I have a very organized system going on here to make this task a possibilityBlofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You were the one who did Tamaulipas huh? Well thats absolutely "super", "man"!! LOL! That was a great move and inspired me to design the rest like so. The only change is to reformat it as one so you have the municipalities and then the relative municipal seat in brackets like Template:Chihuahua etc. Given time, and providing the navboxes aren't too large they could be filled out with notable landmarks and topics aside from municipalities, But the goal first of course is to format all of the templates and then get them all started. Using the Enciclopedia de Mexico site every single municipality in Mexico should clearly eventually be expanded beyond a stub. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I;ve expanded Xalapa today. Is this where you live? Could you expand it further? I;ve also stubbed Juan de la Luz Enríquez, a name of which you undoubtedly aware of. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Central America

Hi Supaman89,

The reason that (in my view) Mexico should be included in the list of Central American countries is the fact that the Mexican states of Chiapas, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatán, and Quintana Roo are by geographic definition in Central America. Of course this doesn't mean the whole country is Central American. But this listing is not just used for political purposes.

From the standpoint of biology, it is very useful to view Central America separately from the rest of North America. Central America is a tropical region that shows a strong South American influence; it is part of the Neotropic ecozone. The rest of North America is subtropical or temperate, and is only weakly influenced by South America; it is in the Nearctic ecozone. For example, in the United States only three mammals (the Virginia Opossum, the Nine-banded Armadillo and the North American Porcupine) originated in South America, while dozens of species of Central American monkeys, cavimorph rodents, anteaters, sloths, armadillos and opossums are descended from South American immigrants. Since the above-mentioned Mexican states are part of this tropical region, their species show similar patterns and they should be included in listings of Central American species. It makes no sense to me to leave them out.

Do you disagree with this reasoning?. If so, could you explain why? WolfmanSF (talk) 04:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I can see how in your view Mexico is in Central America, after all a lot of people associate North America with English-speaking, fully-developed countries such as Canada and the States; but North America is barely a geographical region in which Mexico is indeed located (it's not like it can be moved, right?). Because of this differences with Canada and the U.S. some people try put Mexico in Central America even though it's not, going to extremes like taking that 12% as a fact (which was promoted by some geographers) and further more give it extra emphasis just to "achieve" it. I personally don't care about the location, Mexico could be in Asia, but what is a bit tiring is to see people constantly trying to put Mexico in a region where it just isn't located just because it is different from its 2 neighbours (people don't seem to realize that Anglo America and North America are not the same). I think it would be like saying that Egypt is located in Asia even though 95% of it is located in Africa just because it is different from Nigeria. I hope you understand my points and see that despites cultural differences, geographical location just isn’t something that can be chosen, cheers. Supaman89 (talk) 19:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I think the situation is that you are viewing this issue from a political-cultural standpoint when from the perspective of myself and others it is just a question of geography. Actually, Egypt is listed as both an African country and an Asian country, because the Sinai is in Asia. Similarly, Turkey is listed as both an Asian country and a European country, because it includes part of Thrace which is in Europe. From my perspective, the fact that part of Mexico is in Central America makes it a more diverse and interesting country. It was not my intent to offend anyone by pointing that out. WolfmanSF (talk) 20:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Globe projection

Hi! Thanks:) Here you go. - SSJ ☎ 19:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Gracias...

...and I must say you're doing a fantastic job with the Mexico article. Cheers! --JorgeAranda (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

RBD in Article

RBD should never have made it onto the article. While they are very popular, they will soon fade as many of the boybands(backstreet boys, N'sync)did. You compare them to Modanna in the US but a more accurate portrail would be Alejandra Guzman, Rocio Durcal, Lucero and countless others that have made a more profound legacy in Mexico. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikz911turbo (talk • contribs) 11:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

hi

r u from south city? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.9.46 (talk) 00:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Denmark–Mexico relations

Can anyone help find sources for Denmark–Mexico relations. If can look through Spanish language sources it would be helpful. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Do you have an opinion to express one way or the other at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Mexico relations. You would have more insight than the average person at Wikipedia. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Corticopia

[1] The newest Corticopia. It was just a matter of time after Administrator blocked several pages in which he edit-warred anonymously. So, be notified. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 12:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Belgium–Mexico relations

Perhaps you can express an opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belgium–Mexico relations or help add information at Belgium–Mexico relations. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Rising Power

Want to add your two cents to this proposal I have here. Deavenger (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Spanish people in Mexico

Hello, I am currently dealing with a problem at article Spanish people with User:Jotamar, and I wonder if you can help. I am trying to add Mexico under "regions with significant populations, but I am blocked every time.

Obviously there is a large portion of people with Spanish ancestry in Mexico. Millions are mixed, but millions of others are not and are 'purely' Spanish. The 'White' pop. in Mexico is roughly 15-17 million - and most are of the Spanish ethnic group. I'm having trouble findings sources because he just throws them out using different "reasons" they are not sufficient.

I'm trying to use [2] to establish the 'White' population and [3] to establish that most of those in the 'White' group are Spanish - He says a "country tour" page doesn't cut it. I believe he just doesn't want to list Mexico.

I have a Mexican consulate source that says 77, 041 Spaniards are registered in Mexico (2007) - but that s not the same thing. The US is listed as around 350,000 - and we know Mexico's pop of Spaniards is way larger. I've contacted one other user, but maybe you have ideas as well?

Thanks C.Kent87 (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I will. C.Kent87 (talk) 07:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Chapultepec Castle exclusion/inclusion

Hello Supaman89, I'm sorry to disturb again. I'm having a bit of trouble, maybe you can give your 2 cents to a discussion I'm involved in? In the article Castle, they have removed reference to Chapultepec Castle in the small section 'Later use and revival castles' (It has been there for two years), for various (slightly unclear) reasons. The first comment after its deletion was left on my page, here. Also, you can see the other "reasoning" for its removal at Talk:Castle/Section, which I'm involved in. The opposition even goes as far as comparing Chapultepec with this "castle" [4]...

First, it was only that there wasn't an explicit source stating it as "revival castle' (User:Nev1 wanted no less than for it to state in exact terms its existence as such), but now they just don't think it warrants a mention. I've tried to find an English source (Stating "revival castle") with little luck (maybe you can find one in Spanish?) But I have several architects linking it to castle revivalism (The same architect for Neuschwanstein Castle worked on Chapultepec). One user doesn't want it as a part of the article at all because "already it has an article of its own" - As if the other castles do not (?). Another 'doesn't see my argument".

Technicalities are thrown everywhere, but I believe enough information for its inclusion exists. Chapultepec Castle is just as much a revival castle as those listed from England - yet they seem to overlook that, perhaps because it is in Mexico...? The time period, etc. all point to the reality of Chapultepec being a revival castle, how could it not be? And the fact that it was a North American castle used to house royalty - it is the only onne with that designation.

I had hoped to bring to the reader's attention the fact that these structures do not only exist in Europe - which is what seems to be the wish of those against its inclusion. Anything you can do will help! Thank you. C.Kent87 (talk) 04:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Template for deletion

Friendly heads-up {{Imagemap}} is deprecated and nominated for deletion. It has been superceded by changes to the File namespace and I wanted to let you know, since you have a transclusion on your userpage or user talk. If you need to respond to this message, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Award

		The Mexican Barnstar of National Merit
		Dear friend, I award you this barnstar for your patriotism and tireless efforts in Mexico related articles. Keep up the good work, it is very appreciated. AlexCovarrubias ( Talk? ) 21:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
		this WikiAward was given to Supaman89 by AlexCovarrubias ( Talk? ) on 21:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

North Americans

Hope you like it. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 16:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

North America is Canada, Mexico and the United States. Deal with it!

WikiProject North America

AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 08:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Borders on the North American Union map

Hello ! Can you please remove the borders on this map between the US and Canada and between the US and Mexico ? Like the European Union, there are no longer borders since this a political union. Thank you very much.Mightymights (talk) 22:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Using your Mexico Map

Hello, I would like to use your map of Mexico (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Division_politica_mexico.svg) for some educational material. How should I attribute it to you? Based on your Wikimedia Commons name (El bart089)?

Thanks, Rfuerst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfuerst (talk • contribs) 19:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Your entery of Mexican dance.

Hi body,

I had found your entery on Wikipadia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tradicionalranchero.JPG

I'll be happy to learn more about the photo what you used. You wrote: "A photo taken by me, during an exhibition of traditional dances."

How you explain that on the photo you will find me and my sister dancing in Prague, Czech Republic? We never been in Mexiko. Also it is hard to belive you will publish this as an expert with copyright! Also the costumes are not perfect and has been made in Prague by our self. Now we have new one directly from Mexico, but this photo is old one.....

I do not care about to have an photo on the wbe site, but I do not like to ready a lies....

Our web site is www.dvoranacd.cz

Jan Pumpr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.177.4.5 (talk) 08:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

small translation - English to Spanish

Hello, I could really use a bit of help (no, a lot of help) translating the sentence "Please knock on my door so I can talk to you" or anything similar that is not too formal. Thank you 68.94.6.60 (talk) 03:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BannerMexicoportal.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BannerMexicoportal.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:BannerMexicoportal.PNG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethnicity in Mexico

Template:Ethnicity in Mexico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidalgo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mexico, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bombardier and Q5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mexico Exports/Imports

Template:Mexico Exports/Imports has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Supaman89. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Education in Mexico

Template:Education in Mexico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Meximap01.PNG

The file File:Meximap01.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:State of chihuahua.PNG

The file File:State of chihuahua.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 20:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flag of Mexico02.PNG

The file File:Flag of Mexico02.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas of Mexico

Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas of Mexico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mexicanlogo.PNG

The file File:Mexicanlogo.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Guau! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guau! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guau! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ninaindigena.JPG

The file File:Ninaindigena.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Worldregions.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Worldregions.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mexican secretariats

Template:Mexican secretariats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political Divisions of Mexico

Template:Political Divisions of Mexico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:States of Mexico by municipality

Template:States of Mexico by municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cancunview2004.JPG

The file File:Cancunview2004.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Better aerial shots available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Carabelashispanas.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Carabelashispanas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)