Veertlte
Don't shoot, I'm only the piano player edit
Re your edit here, let me suggest something: use the "preview" button before you save. It'll let you see if the changes have the effect you want. (I used to just save first, too...& I don't always preview to spellcheck yet, which I always end up regretting....) TREKphiler hit me ♠ 13:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- On the same subject, have you got a source for the dates you changed? Otherwise, it's liable to get reverted as possible vandalism. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 19:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hola edit
Hi man, I'm asumming you speak Spanish, if you don't, then talk to me back as well. Mira gracias por contribuir al articulo, de hecho me agradan tus contribuciones, pero a veces se tienen que revertir por ciertos motivos (no es por que la traigamos contigo ni mucho menos jeje) te voy a explicar por que reverti algunas de tus ediciones:
- Gracias por actualizar los datos de ingreso per capita y demas, me parecio excelente.
- Acerca de la foto de la Sierra Madre, en la seccion ya habia otra foto de Chihuaha con nieve y lo que tratamos de hacer era mostrar todos los climas de Mexico, asi que si pudieras conseguir alguna foto de los Cenotes de Yucatan seria excelente.
- La foto de la refineria de Pemex se ve un poco oscura y sucia, tal vez su pudieras conseguir una foto mejor o inclusive encontrar una foto de un campo eolico del pais, quedaria mejor.
- La foto del hopital de la Cd. de Mexico, esta bien, pero la idea era mostrar un hospital promedio, no muy exagerado para que no se vea rebuscado, por eso es que el hospital de Tabasco queda bien, si hubieramos querido poner un hospital super moderno, hubieramos puesto el de Puebla[1].
Y bueno esos son los motivos por los cuales revertimos algunas de tus ediciones, por favor contestame en mi pagina de usuario para que platiquemos mas, entre otras cosas, como subir fotos sin que te als eliminen, saludos. Supaman89 (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Gracias por contestar, mira yo y otros usuarios vigilamos el articulo de Mexico bastante seguido para mejorarlo, nosotros tenemos nuestros correos para poder chatear y discutir como mejorar los articulos relacionados con Mexico mas rapidamente y sin tener que hacerlo por aca, asi que te voy a dejar mi correo para que platiquemos por Messenger (luego te paso los de AlexCovarrubias, JCmenal y otros) cuando me agregues por ahi te platico un truco para que no te eliminen las fotos que subas, recuerda que por eso te bloquearon tu cuenta anterior, camara wey. Supaman89 (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wey, enserio agregame a tus contactos, Alex, JC y yo tenemos algunas cosas que decirte, o si no bueno entonces contestame diciendo "no te puedo agregar" o yo que se, para que borre mi correo de este mensaje, adios. Supaman89 (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wey, pero creo que tienes que tener un correo de Hotmail para poder agregarte al Messenger, pero bueno, si no tienes uno no hay pex, nadamas no vas a poder chatear con nosotros, pero pues cualquier cosa ya sabes puedes comunicarte por mi Talkpage, camara. Supaman89 (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Wey tranquilo edit
Wey, tranquilo, el articulo ya esta demaciado pesado (inclusive dice que es recomendable reducirlo) y no podemos saturarlo de imagenes nadamas por que si. En la edicion que hice deje algunas de tus imagenes para que no digas que te lo reverti todo, asi que por favor parale.
P.D. como te dije en el resumen, para la otra trata de usar el Preview en vez de hacer un monton de mini-ediciones. Supaman89 (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- No me contestaste, pero bueno, te aviso que voy a revertir el articulo a la ultima version (en la que deje varias de tus imagenes y removi algunas otras), como te dije en el mensaje anterior es por que el articulo ya esta demaciado pesado y no podemos adherir tantan imagenes sin ningun motivo, espero que no lo vuelvas a revertir sin ninguna explicacion por que no quiero empezar una guerra de ediciones, ok. Supaman89 (talk) 20:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Look, I'm not against you contributing to the article, in fact that's good, but contributing doesn't just mean add pictures like crazy, it means redacting and improving the sections. Now regarding the space, everytime you edit the article it says at the top of the page "this article is too heavy for Wikipedia standards, it'd be better to divide it into specific articles" as you can see we cannot just fill the article with pictures from top to bottom, and since you were the one who started adding all the images (some of them good) you're the one who has to propose your changes first, not just do it and then ask me to review your edition.
BTW, I didn't get your last comment. Supaman89 (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, look when I'm using the PC it already takes around 10 secs to open the page, and when I'm using the laptop (which is faster) it takes around half the time, so we have to save some space, anyways it's not just about the quantity of the picture but about them, you added so many all of a sudden that I couldn't even explained one by one why I removed them, so i'll start:
Pre-Columbian civilizations
Image:Teotihuacan mexico.jpg Two pyramids in the same section? common, besides it doesn't have good quality.
Military
Image:Mexican cadet.jpg That section has barely 4 paragraphs, and already has 3 pictures (air, land and sea) an extra one is unnecesary.
Economy
Image:Shoppingcenterleon.jpg Good, it's not a super fancy mall but not a cheap one either.
Image:Pemextanker.jpg Good, but if you could find a better picture it'd be better.
Image:LCDfactoryMexico.jpg Okay, but I moved it to the Communications section along with the Telmex store.
Image:Housesverecruz.jpg It's just a bunch of nice houses, I don't see how that portraits the economy (no other country has houses in their economy sections.)
Energy
Image:MexicoOilRefinery.jpg It has bad quality and again, we already have a Pemex image, the Wind Turbines fits better in that section.
Tourism
Image:Hotelmexico.jpg That only includes one hotel, the aereal picture of Cancun would fit much better.
Demographics
Image:Mexicohouses.jpg That same section already has another image of Guadalajara, there's no reason to include 2 of the same city, (besides they're just some houses, it doesn't reflect the city).
Religion
Image:Virgen de guadalupe2.jpg The section already has an image of a cathedral, we cannot put two catholic images there, a picture of a synagogue would be more neutral.
Culture
Image:Teatro Juarez.jpg Okay, but probably a picture of a Mexican film would fit better since it is the Cinema section (maybe some old film with Maria Felix or something like that).
Image:Chile Rellenos.jpg As you can see all the areas in the Culture section only include one picture (left, right, left, right) the current picture of the Enchiladas is fine and doesn't break the style.
Health Care and Education
Image:Mexicanmedicalrobots.jpg Yes, that one's pretty good, it shows that Mexican students have good technology.
Image:Hospital Juárez de México.png If you had checked the discussion page, you would've seen that there was a discusion about that section, we could've put better hospitals if we wanted to, but the reason why we don't is because we're trying to portrait an average Mexican hospital to be realistics.
Image:Escuelamexico.jpg It's repetitive, we already have a photo of other school kids some sections up, besides with that one it's 5 pictures (uneven) for a section its size.
Image:Aeronauticalresearchbuilding.jpg Okay, I guess we can leave it there to put 2 pictures on each side.
Science and technology
Image:Turbinesinyucatan.jpg Good image, but not here, it belongs to the Energy section, BTW didn't you have a Chiapas Windpower picture?
Image:FusilMondragon.jpg With that picture, the section would have 3 images and would be uneven, besides to put a riffle in the Sci&Tech section doesn't look too good. Supaman89 (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
October 2008 edit
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Demographics of Mexico. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kman543210 (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Fake pictures edit
Man, seriously what's up the fake pictures you put? that just looses credibility for the article, now I have to wander if the other pictures you put before were real or not. 18:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
| Mexico City | Leon | Guadalajara |
|---|---|---|
Please stop adding all those weapons to the category.
They may be in use, but indexing Wikipedia that way leads to clutter. Adding links to those articles from a central article, say List of military equipment of Mexico would be fine. But if every country which uses say the H&K G3 rifle were listed as a category in the article, it would be around 100 categories long, which is way too much and not even slightly useful.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
If you will refer to the discussion page of the Mexican Army article you will see I am the only one puting in any effort to engage in a dialogue whereas others simply keep reverting and adding unreliable sources to make very outlandish claims about the Mexican Army's inventory. It is true that the Mexican Army buys and samples many weapons but that does not mean that they are in use or given as standard issue weapons. if you don't know what constitutes a reliable source then refer to Wikipedia's WP:Reliable Sources page. Ocelotl10293 (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
U.N. small arms registry edit
Hola, Donde se pueden encontrar referencias hacia ese registro del cual estas hablando?
Hasta el momento lo unico que veo son armas que estan incluidas en el juego Rainbow Six Vegas, necesitamos referencias solidas en este articulo, ademas el G3 y el FX-05 son el armamento princlipal, no tiene caso saturarla de informacion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slacker ARG (talk • contribs) 18:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
re:Mexico Hospital edit
Well, we know there are tones of fancy hospitals in Mexico as well as a lot of not-so-nice ones; a while ago we had a discussion about that section and the obvious thing to do was to show a normal hospital (nothing too crappy or too fancy) cuz if we only put a lot of cool hospitals, rich schools, the superb malls, etc. the article would loose credibility, right? Now, the picture of Hospital Juarez does look fancy (it might not be, but it does look like that), therefore people reading the article will think, "This thing is biased..." that's why we have to select the pictures carefully, I myself don't like the current hospital much, but we haven't found something better that still looks average and is not within the big cities, maybe a normal hospital somewhere in "provincia" would help. Supaman89 (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Tengo una duda edit
Se que las imagenes que has subido a la pagina las has obtenido del internet, esta bien yo tambien lo he hecho varias veces, PERO lo que me procupa es que varias de ellas son completamente equivocadas y ni siquiera son de Mexico, asi que quisiera saber si las siguientes imagenes realmente son de Mexico o no: Supaman89 (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
| Tanque Pemex | CC Leon | Centro de Aeronautica | Medicina Unam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dado que has puesto images de plantas nucleares equivocadas, quisiera saber si estos tanques efecticamente son de Pemex. | Veo que tiene señales en español, pero para asegurar, podrias decirme cual es el nombre de ese CC, para verificart que este en Leon? | Edificio de Invertigacion Aeronautica? podrias encontrarme mas informacion al respecto? (sitio web, mas imagenes, etc.) | No alcanzo a ver el logo claramente, y no quisiera que esta imagen que hemos estado mostrando no sea de la UNAM. |
United States and other issues edit
Please provide justification for the removal of the Abu Ghraib picture.
Also, why on earth did you modify several articles to say that Brazil has a population of over a billion? [2][3][4] This is particularly troubling as there is no imaginable justification; it seems very akin to vandalism. Chedorlaomer (talk) 06:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- It would help if you used edit summaries more often. Chedorlaomer (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
GDP values edit
In reference to you recent edits, you are looking at the GDP (PPP) values rather than the GDP (nominal) values that both lists are based on. There is a big difference and if you are unsure what the difference is, GDP is a good basic primer. You might also want to check out List of countries by GDP (nominal) for a up-to-date list on the size of the economies of all countries measured on market-exchange rates. On the section on Mexico, it would help if you included some references as a lot of it seems to be original research. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. I hope to further improve this article in the future. Nirvana888 (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
...Veertlte edit
...Veertlte, would you stop making nonsense edits for no reason?. Supaman89 (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Foto de la SIerra Madre edit
En el artículo de Oaxaca subiste una foto de la Sierra madre del sur con montañas nevadas. Podrías especificar mejor en que zona fue tomada la foto? Nunca había visto nieve en Oaxaca. Así que me parece interesante tener algo de mas datos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herlufoax (talk • contribs) 08:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Warnings edit
April 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
May 2009 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mexico. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Barrett M107 .50 Cal. sniper users edit
Hello Thanks for the Barrett M107 .50 Cal. sniper users map. Please note that you need to add Lebanon to it. The US recently supplier the Lebanese Armed Forces with a number of these snipers.
Please check here.
Thank you --Zaher1988 · Talk|Contributions 08:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello!!! Please also color in Alaska and Hawaii since they are not currently colored in. User:Nnickn
Brazil article edit
what was that you made to Brazil's article? What about that strange languages you've put there and all the mistakes you've made? Please, be sure of what you doing before editing the article. Victorfri (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Veertlte/Infobox Mexico edit
User:Veertlte/Infobox Mexico, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Veertlte/Infobox Mexico and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Veertlte/Infobox Mexico during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 04:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mexicohospital.jpg edit
A tag has been placed on File:Mexicohospital.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:21, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:NuclearPowerPlant.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Nuclearplantwithcow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)