User talk:Shibbolethink/Archive 16
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flavan-3-ol on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Jesse D. Bloom: WP:PREPRINT
Hi, regarding your edit to Jesse D. Bloom where you removed a paragraph on the basis of WP:PREPRINT, I just wanted to confirm my understanding. That paragraph is sourced from a Variety article that on any view is RS. The particular statement on the page does relate to a preprint, but the statement is not sourced from the preprint, so while I completely agree that preprints "are not reliable sources", the statement on the page that you have deleted is from a reliable source. So I'm a bit confused as to the policy basis for its deletion? Thanks for your time. Cabrils (talk) 12:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk page comments
I’m at a loss to be able to communicate this to you any more clearly than I already have. You seem intelligent and to have been around for while, so I hope that it’s simply your strong views on the article subj that are clouding your judgement in this one instance, and that you don’t act this way all the time. The /Sources part of the Azov talk page is still an article talk page, and subject to the behavioural guidelines. As per Wp:TPO, do not move my comments. I’ve put them where I believe appropriate, and that placement does not breach the general guidelines and does not contravene Wp:RFC guidelines. I’m flattered that you think the two sentences that I wrote would be so influential as to damage the impact of the framework created at the top of the RFC by this table, or whatever other reason you have to keep moving it. Regardless, please refrain from repeatedly doing so. In the spirit of fully observing the talk policies that we have for a reason, I’ve not moved your prefacing comment, which you may want to move back. Kindly do the same courtesy. Cambial — foliar❧ 04:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Cambial Yellowing: TPO actually permits moving comments to the appropriate location, explicitly:
Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments are:
- Move. At times, it may make sense to move off-topic posts to a more appropriate talk page.
- Why is this not an example of that? When every other editor who has had concerns about the source review has commented elsewhere?I'm not quite sure why you think I'm "close to the topic." My only interaction with that page has been to make the source review, and to collapse the dozens of SPA threads who are showing up for one side or the other. I have no strong opinions on the RFC and have changed my view on it several times based on the sources. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 08:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- My reference to strong views was in seeking an explanation, assuming good faith, for why an experienced user was repeatedly ignoring behavioural policy. If you say that’s not the explanation I believe you. As to your implicit suggestion that my comment was
off-topic
, I’ll not comment, out of politeness. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)- Oh I think you misunderstand when I refer to your comments being "off topic." I just mean that they were in the wrong place. Everyone else who has commented on the source review has done so somewhere else. So, by its very nature, that is not the "on topic" place to do so. I understand why you're concerned about the source review. I understand you believe your comments are on topic where they are. I honestly don't care enough to talk about this any further. Please do not continue to post on my talk page, thanks. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 11:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- My reference to strong views was in seeking an explanation, assuming good faith, for why an experienced user was repeatedly ignoring behavioural policy. If you say that’s not the explanation I believe you. As to your implicit suggestion that my comment was
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
Editing newsletter 2022 – #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.
23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
RFC Close notification
Just thought I'd notify you as the RFC starter that I have closed the discussion on the case and death count section in Talk:Chinese_government_response_to_COVID-19#Alleged_under-counting_of_cases_and_deaths. Feel free to discuss it in my user talk page. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 13:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:FB MSBS Grot on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of the United States on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Happy summer/winter
|
Sunshine! | |
| Hello Shibbolethink! Interstellarity (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC) |
Happy first day of summer (or winter) wherever you live. Interstellarity (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
Wikibreak
The days of <radiology elective> were long and beautiful and free, and felt like they could last forever.
Unfortunately, it was not to be. And the large flat hard wall of <actual grades> and <actual effortful work> came swiftly upon him.
Peace, love, and fun where fun is duly weighted by reliable peer-reviewed sources. --Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 08:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Proclamation of accession of Elizabeth II on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
edit at lab leak theory
here what is "the BSL3 lab at the Wuhan CDC"? having a bit of trouble googling that. was this edit sum written by a bot? thanks, skakEL 11:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher). Hey there. You may find the information at these articles helpful: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Biosafety level. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
was this edit sum written by a bot?
I assure you I am a real person. NL provided some good links below to research this further. Thanks. In general, when entering a heavily disputed area, it's a good idea to read up on the past history before making controversial changes. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)- There's only one way to be sure.
Which of these images contain a motorcycle?- Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- #6 is definitely a motorcycle 🏍️🏍️ –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like anything to me! Stares forward blankly in typical pro-China shill fashion — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- #6 is definitely a motorcycle 🏍️🏍️ –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
- From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something
- News and notes: Information considered harmful
- In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap
- Op-Ed: The "recession" affair
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
- Community view: Youth culture and notability
- Opinion: Criminals among us
- Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement
- Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country
- Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us
- Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists
- Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot
- On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
- Essay: How to research an image
- Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed
- Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia
- Gallery: A backstage pass
- From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened
Research article in Science
26 Jul 2022 research article in Science: The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
Key quote: "Our analyses indicate that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred via the live wildlife trade in China, and show that the Huanan market was the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic." --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 07:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
BRD
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it or an alternate version. ScrumptiousFood (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Greetings
I want to thankyou for your comments. I am feeling like there is nothing I can do right now. Some of the other comments seem extreme. Like suggesting I should not edit any article that is a name like "Carmen del Toro". It also feels like there is no place where I can express how I feel without being punished. It seems some feel they need to punish, punish, punish and punish some more. Maybe my even posting on your talk page is a violation.
No one I know from outside of Wikipedia really understands how I feel about it, or the processes going on, and it sometimes feel there is no way I can communicate on Wikipedia. The whole situation is frustrating.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
you hid my talk page text on Libs of Tiktok
Hello,
seconds after I posted it, you hid my talk page text on Talk:Libs_of_TikTok, claiming WP:TALKOFFTOPIC. This is not correct. The text was not off topic - I was directly called to answer by the post I was answering, and I explained in some detail why I thought this was a fruitless exercise. Anyway, also by WP:TALKOFFTOPIC I hereby object to this hiding, and I would politely request you to remove it following that guideline. Thanks, Wefa (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, but it does open you up to further sanctions for posting long in depth comments on the subject and your opinion about the subject rather than wikipedia policy or application thereof. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 20:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- It appears someone else has removed your comments, I have no control over that, and I would urge you to take it up with that user. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 21:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)