Roman Krukovsky

Proposed deletion of Justice and Equality

The article Justice and Equality has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It does exist, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Somali Social Unity Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Somali Social Unity Party, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

"Justice and Communist Party" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Justice and Communist Party. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Justice and Communist Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Why did you delete my edit?

Why delete the photos and the party of Syrian election candidates مهدی درخشانی مشهدی (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

مهدی درخشانی مشهدی, apparently, on Wikimedia Commons, you uploaded photos that violate copyright and were clearly not taken by you. Wikimedia Commons only accepts materials that are freely licensed or in the public domain. If this is really your work, then please follow the OTRS instructions. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Zhanna Son for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhanna Son is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhanna Son until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JBchrch talk 16:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Somali Social Unity Party

Hello, Roman Kubanskiy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Somali Social Unity Party, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Justice and Equality

Hello, Roman Kubanskiy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justice and Equality, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zhanna Son

Hello, Roman Kubanskiy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zhanna Son, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Vladimir Putin. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 01:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Tartan357, what makes you think that the photo was taken using upscale? I found it through the "Image Search". The "upscale version" of the photo may be distinguished by the presence of strong smoothing on the neck and sharpness at the edges of the jacket, but this is not the case, it's not upscale. Anyway photos always have better quality, but as you know Kremlin.ru doesn't place them in their original quality, only in 1880x1160. I propose to convene colleagues on the discussion page on the issue of these two photo versions. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 06:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

You have a history of doing that with photos, such as File:Александр Лукашенко (28-12-2021) (cropped).jpg, which resulted in the lapel seemingly blending into the rest of the suit, and you didn't provide a source for the higher-quality version of the Putin photo. Please provide your source so we can see what modifications were made from the original, if any. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 07:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I have done it, but this is not the case. The source of that photo is Sputnik.by, most likely this photo was taken by the Kremlin Pool of this agency. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 07:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I believe you. Unfortunately that link is not working for me though. If you can get a working link I'd be okay with you overwriting the file if you update the source field. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 07:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

It is unlikely that it will be possible to do this, this picture in this version is only here. Most likely, your country has blocked access to this site due to political issues. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Tartan357, so what's the result? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

The link is working for me now, so you can make the change. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 18:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Returned that version. What are we going to do with that consensus now? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

I overwrote File:Владимир Путин (17-11-2021).jpg with the full high-quality version, and made File:Vladimir Putin 17-11-2021 (cropped).jpg the cropped version, that way you do not need to get new consensus for a different file name on Wikipedia. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 18:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hmm, I think File:Владимир Путин (17-11-2021).jpg need to leave it as it is, since the whole photo is there, and the HQ version contains only part of this photo. And the HQ version, which is part of the whole photo, we will put in the file I uploaded (File:Владимир Путин (17-11-2021) (cropped).jpg). Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 18:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

It's up to you, since you are the original uploader and the full photo was not being used anywhere. But I think this is the simplest way to do it. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 18:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

The way you've done it works well too. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Abe

I have moved your addition to Talk:Assassination_of_Shinzo_Abe#Should_this_reaction_from_Russia_(Kremlin_Spokesperson)_be_added Venkat TL (talk) 09:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Renat 09:31, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

So why didn't you approve my edit and you canceled it? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 09:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Because I do not think that your edit improved anything. Can you explain your edit? Renat 09:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Because I reworked it according to WP:NPOV. In my opinion, it is not necessary to state such statements as a fact based on several sources. Therefore, it is worth putting in the second paragraph that he is such and such, and, accordingly, explain why. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Which part of WP:NPOV are you referring to? Renat 09:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

I guess it's WP:WEIGHT and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 09:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Can you give a specific quote? Because I do not see how WP:WEIGHT is connected to this case. And WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV is about "biased statements of opinion". Are you saying that the statement "Dmitry Kiselyov is a propagandist" is a biased statement of opinion? Why? Do you also think that "Dmitry Kiselyov is a television presenter and news executive" is also a "biased statement of opinion"? Renat 10:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TylerBurden (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Adding Russian translations where they are not relevant

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Why didn't you like my edits specifically? I added links so that sooner or later an article would be created in English (these articles are not available in English), while at the same time its Wikidata would not differ. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 20:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I think the topic heading makes it pretty clear. Why is a Russian transliteration and link relevant here? Or here? This is English Wikipedia. Those templates are intended for topics that are particularly relevant to another language, or that might not exist in English. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't know, because this full-fledged article is only in Russian (and Amogus is quite popular in Russia). "Sleepy Joe" was also covered by Russian-language scientific sources, along with English-language ones. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

None of those additions are useful to English Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

How do you define "useful"? If it is regulated by the rules that you cannot add links to other Wikipedia individual articles, then the undid version may be justified. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

So I don't see a problem in linking to a Wikipedia article in another language if there is no such article in English. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

That may be OK for topics with a strong tie to a language, but certainly not for silly things like "Amogus," "Sleepy Joe," or an American comic character. I'm advising you again to not do that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bobroedka

Hello, Roman Kubanskiy,

Thank you for creating Bobroedka.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is most likely better added to her article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

"Partially recognized state"

Roman, I have already removed your addition to the DPR/LPR articles twice already. The sources merely state that the DPR/LPR are "partially recognized", but anyone can figure out this information without requiring it to be stated verbatim and backed up by sources. Literally, the second that a single country (or even de facto state) recognizes the DPR/LPR, that makes them partially recognized by default. The first entity to recognize the DPR/LPR was actually South Ossetia back in 2014, whereas the first United Nations member state to recognize them was Russia in 2022. But either way, the recognition only makes them partially recognized; it has no bearing on whether they qualify for "statehood" or not. Neither of the two sources that you provided made a comment on statehood. Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, they were merely pointing out the obvious. I already know that the DPR/LPR were/are partially-recognized. What I'm more interested in is whether they were actually "states" at any given point in time, as opposed to some other type of entity (e.g. Russian puppet state, proto-state, quasi-state, etc.). You should not add the sentence and identical sources back to the article; if you can find sources that comment specifically on the statehood of the DPR/LPR, then, by all means, add the sentence back to the article (but worded specifically to comment on statehood, rather than on recognition). Jargo Nautilus (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Internet memes introduced in 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Internet memes introduced in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian propaganda films

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian propaganda films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Sleepy Joe (Joe Biden)

Please read MOS:OUR to understand why your edit was incorrect. Schazjmd (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Oh God, I didn't even notice that I had changed it. I was actually going to undo this edit. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 21:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

We all have our "oops!" moments. Schazjmd (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bobroedka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bobroedka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobroedka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

1RR

Please note that Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine is subject to a WP:1RR restriction. Please discuss your edits on the talk page. — Czello ^(music) 12:29, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

To be specific, after your change to the first sentence in Special:Diff/1189217990 on 10 December 2023 was reverted and disputed at Talk:Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine § Disputing edit per BRD, you attempted to reinstate substantially similar language in Special:Diff/1212549636 at 12:06, 8 March 2024 (which was reverted), and once again in Special:Diff/1212552026 at 12:28, 8 March 2024. This is a violation of both the policy against edit warring and the one-revert rule (1RR) page restriction on the Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine article. The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (WP:BRD) is recommended for contentious topic areas. See below for the standard warning message for edit warring. — Newslinger talk 19:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring at Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 19:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Re

I checked your sources, but whatever the American "hawks" might think [1], USA have lost the information/hybrid war with Russia miserably. Russia has helped to install the president who is known as "Putin's puddle" [2] and have done a lot of things like that. He is doing a damage to America that KGB could not even dream about [3], [4]. My very best wishes (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Well, I am even more convinced of your position. And the fact is that you selectively imagine sources and facts to please yourself, taking some random nickname and news from left-wing publications to insult Trump. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 05:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I only wanted to say something about this opinion. Not only USA can not beat Russian propaganda in Russia, but they can not beat it in the United States. Many Russians in USA still think that Bucha was staged. There is little USA can do with "information operations". They can only win through actual military operations, i.e. providing a lot of hardware to Ukrainians. But they did not because of the actions by Trump and his Republican supporters. This is pretty much a common place. My very best wishes (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)