User talk:Olaf Kosinsky/Archive 1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 30 January 2022
Archive 1

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aschoff Solar

 

The article Aschoff Solar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, and appears to fail WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tazerdadog (talk) 06:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Olaf Kosinsky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Olaf Kosinsky. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walk of Fame of Cabaret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Günter Neumann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Olaf Kosinsky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

Template:Current members of the Bundestag

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. {{Current members of the Bundestag}} must not appear in a paragraph that begins with an asterisk (*), number sign (#) or colon (:), because if it does it causes a Multiline table in list lint error. Put it on a new line of its own.—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for the advice. I will keep to it when incorporating further templates. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20st-century German politicians

 

A tag has been placed on Category:20st-century German politicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stefan Ruppert

Hello, Olaf Kosinsky,

Thank you for creating Stefan Ruppert.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article currently has just 1 independent reliable source (Usinger Anzeiger). At least 1-2 extra independent reliable sources should be added.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Translations

Hi. Thanks for all the new pages you have created on German politicians. When translating from the German Wikipedia, you need to give attribution in the edit summary and also place the {{translated page}} template on the talk page. Please see WP:HOWTRANS for further details. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled right

Thanks for all your articles on Bundestag members past and present! At the moment you're not listed as autopatrolled on Wikipedia, meaning your articles go into the queue to be manually reviewed. Have you considered applying so this isn't necessary? I can tell you know what you're doing and I'm keen to reduce the amount of work new page reviewers need to do checking on proven contributors. You can do this yourself, or I'd be very happy to do it for you. Blythwood (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Blythwood:Many thanks for the advice. I made the request. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

 

Hi Olaf Kosinsky, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 21:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helsinki Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of members of the 14th Bundestag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Christian Lange, Johannes Kahrs, Wilhelm Schmidt, Albert Schmidt, Christian Müller, Werner Schuster, Michael Roth, Christian Schmidt and Klaus Müller

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I note that following this notice you have created several other lists of members of the Bundestag whch contain multiple links to people who do not have an article, but have a discambiguation page (which makes the link appear Blue). Could you check the links are appropriate see for example: List of members of the 11th Bundestag, List of members of the 10th Bundestag & List of members of the 12th Bundestag each with the dab links in bright red.— Rod talk 15:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
@Rodw: I am currently working through these lists to correct the wrong links. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks - many of them, where there is no article, should have (politician) added after the name so that it appears as a red link awaiting an article on that person. I also noticed this applies to some of the templates you are editing eg Template:8th Bundestag CDU/CSU.— Rod talk 15:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
I've also been working through these lists, which form most of the current Templates with disambiguation links. There are also a few random mislinks, such as Willi Fischer who was a boxer. Occasionally we need more than "(politician)": Karl Hoffmann is unlikely to be the same guy who declined election to the Swiss Federal Council in 1881. We may need to run transclusion checks on these templates once we've fixed the obvious errors and waited for the check's database to catch up. Certes (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

What's the best way to coordinate fixing of the lists and of the templates which essentially duplicate them? I've been concentrating on templates, as each is used in dozens of articles and the links they create dominate the daily Disambiguation pages with links report, but I realise that all the work will have to be done again for the lists if we need to repeat the information. Also, please can you particularly check Michael Müller (politician)? I suspect that he was a bit young for the {{10th Bundestag SPD}} and that there may have been two (or more) SPD politicians of that name. Certes (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I recommend checking the box Preferences > Gadgets > Display links to disambiguation pages in orange. I've handled several of the lists, and that setting makes the ambiguous links very easy to find. The most difficult problem (a perennial one) is if a bluelink points to totally the wrong article. The more glaring examples can be spotted by eye (as hypothetical examples, if I noticed that Michael Schumacher or Franz Schubert - or even Wilhelm Busch - had been elected to the Bundestag, my alarm bells would ring). The only complete solution is to laboriously check every single bluelink.

From what I've seen, the corresponding German list articles are in very good shape. I can't remember an instance where I couldn't make an {{ill}} link to the biography article on German WP. Care is sometimes needed to choose the correct qualifier, most often if there is more than one politician with the same name. Narky Blert (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I've had a go at these, and so have several other editors, but it's a massive task: we've fixed literally thousands of links between us. I'm fairly confident that the templates no longer link to non-politicians but some of the lists still do. (For example, List of members of the 1st Bundestag still links to 19th-century palaeontologist Georg Baur rather than his namesake in the Reichstag.) I'll see if I can weed out more bad links tomorrow. Certes (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I am currently in the process of integrating the templates into the articles and am also correcting the errors. I also continue to create new articles.Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 07:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I fixed a few more after realising that I'd missed the links which used underscores rather than spaces. I've probably done all I can on this for now; it looks 99% correct, and catching the few outstanding issues would probably take more work than is feasible. Thanks everyone! Certes (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I've reconciled the lists and templates and found the following differences. I'm not sure how to fix them so I thought I'd leave them here. There may be some false positives, e.g. where a politician has married and changed surname. Numbers 1–19 refer to the Bundestage.

Hope that helps, Certes (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@Certes: Great. Thank you very much for your commitment. I'll work off the mistakes now and mark this. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for persisting with these fixes. I know this has been a lot more work than anyone expected, and I appreciate your taking the time to get it right. Certes (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

DYK for Liselotte Funcke

On 6 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liselotte Funcke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as Federal Commissioner for Foreigners in the 1980s, German politician Liselotte Funcke (pictured) saw her role as an "interpreter" of the problems of foreign workers, especially Turks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liselotte Funcke. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Liselotte Funcke), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Just a question

Hi Olaf

Usually i create pages direct and not with draft and it gets approved in 2 days but since last 3 pages i have used Article Draft now i want to know its not yet reviewed so can i blank this page and publish the article direct?

Draft:Nick Wrenn and Draft:Misbah Mumtaz Memon KutianaWala (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Review explanation

Hello dear administrator,

I hope You're fine.

You reviewed a page I created about the german actress Wencke Synak, and left the following comment: "The sources should be formatted correctly"

Can you please explain more here?

I think you wanted to say that I should add publisher, title, date...in the references. That's right?

Also, that's the only problem with this page?

Best Robert RobertLasper (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Per nom

Hello Olaf, "Per nom" is an argument to avoid in deletion discusions. It’s much more helpful to the closer if you spell out the reasons why, in your own words, you think an article should be deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!

 

Just wanted to say thank you for all your help in approving my article "Office of the MTA Inspector General"! Hope to see you on wiki as I continue contributing. Thanks again and have a great day!

Dblu9494 (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Moritz Resl

Hi Olaf Kosinsky, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moritz Resl since you accepted it at AfC. thanks, Vexations (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

ITN recognition for Thomas Oppermann

On 26 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Thomas Oppermann, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

articles from the deWP

As an administrator here, I am one of the frequent reviewers of draft articles on organizations and individuals associated with them, and on academic people. I notice that you have been working with translations of these articles from the deWP, in particular those translate by MMike94. I do a little checking and revising of rough German translations myself; though my skill in German is nowhere near enough to actually write or even easily translate a long article, I can at least revise mechanical or other rough translations when the English version is non-idiomatic, or comes out in German syntax. Needless to say, the ones you and MMike have been working on do not have this sort of problem.

The problem is a more subtle. The deWP is probably in most respects a better encyclopedia than enWP, but some of the conventions are different. We are considerably more subject than you to attacks on our integrity for promotional purposes, and one of the ways we are handling this is by enforcing particularly rigorous standards for notability of organizations and people associated with them as executives (see WP:NCORP, especially for the sort of sources no longer accepted--we are becoming very doubtful about the reliability of any source connected with the organization.) There is also what I would consider a cultural difference between the European respect for official and quasi-official organizations, and also large corporate enterprises, as compared to the current skepticism about them from those who are likely to be active in enWP.

As an administrator, I cannot go by my own preferences on how the rules should be interpreted, but have to follow in a very conservative manner the current consensus of our community. It is no secret at enWP that I am often in disagreement with some aspects of this consensus, and therefore in any official action I need to be exceptionally careful to act only as an agent of the community view. (When I am advocating for my own opinion, I do it quite differently.)

In addition to standards of notability and sourcing, we have a different style of writing. We typically regard any praise of the subject as promotional , even if it from an official or other usually reliable source. We expect coldly objective language, without rhetorical devices-- the sort of writing that nobody could possibly mistake for a web page from the organization. I can summarize it as saying that the importance should not be specifically stated, but should be obviously indicated by the facts presented.

The deWP has elaborate corporate histories. Ours are usually briefer, and need to be worded in terms of the facts of mergers and acquisitions and name changes, and numerical data on production and market share. We include information about changes in the CEO, but not other executives.

In biographies, we tend to remove family details except for the name of the spouse and the number of children, though we expect a chronological listing of education and employment. If there are awards, we usually prefer them as a list, not in running prose, and reduced to the essentials. We generally only include awards at a highest national level. For publications, we do not follow the deWP practice of simply linking to the list in a national library or a database. If there are books, we list them all. For a scientist, where peer-reviewed articles are the equivalent, we select them on some objective criterion, usually most highly cited, in full bibliographic format. We do not include conference presentations or other minor publications for anyone.

There are also words to avoid. I normally remove from any article I edit all uses of the word "prestigeous" , "famous", "leading", "well-known", or equivalents. I normally remove or rewordevery one of them when I edit any article. A convenient replacement for "best-known for" can be "is a specialist in" or the like. The applicability of these terms should be obvious from the contents. (Using the article on Rudolf Pichlmayr as an example: there is no need to say "He was one one of the leading transplant physicians in Germany.". The fact that he was head of the transplantation department of Hannover medical school implies that. ) We avoid vague terms: "among others", "including" , "world-wide", "some of" ... We just state the most important.

Please forgive me for addressing in such a way someone who is clearly a very skilled excellent and careful editor - I'm more used to dealing with corporate PR representatives,. enWP is peculiar, and many of the editors here do not understand the deWP practices. I can help you navigate the differences. Just ask on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

December 2020

  I noticed that you have posted comments to the page BioNTech in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Please use English rather than German sources - there are plenty available. The History section does not need such excessive detail, WP:NOTCATALOG. Zefr (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Olaf, you helped me with a previous article I created on wikipedia and I'm hoping you can help me again. I wrote another article, but am having a hard time submitting it as an article of creation so that it can be approved by a different wiki user (aka not me). Please let me know what I should be doing differently, or if possible can you help me get it to the right place? Thank you so much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Carolyn_Pokorny Dblu9494 (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Parliamentary State Secretary of Germany has been nominated for renaming to Category:Parliamentary State Secretaries of Germany

 

Category:Parliamentary State Secretary of Germany has been nominated for renaming to Category:Parliamentary State Secretaries of Germany. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:State Secretary of Germany has been nominated for renaming to Category:State Secretaries of Germany

 

Category:State Secretary of Germany has been nominated for renaming to Category:State Secretaries of Germany. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

Draft:PM-International

Hallo Olaf Kosinsky. Wir haben den Artikel nun stark entworben und würden uns sehr über neues Feedback freuen. Viele Grüße CobaltElephant (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

 

Hello Olaf Kosinsky:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

Nomination of Sami Atiya for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sami Atiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sami Atiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creepTalk 22:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Björn Rosengren (manager)

 

The article Björn Rosengren (manager) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References are single interview and a profile. No indication of notability. Structured indicated it has been copied from somewhere else. Fails WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 22:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Björn Rosengren (manager) for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Björn Rosengren (manager) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Björn Rosengren (manager) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creepTalk 23:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Olaf Kosinsky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~TNT (she/they • talk) 14:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current EP Ireland

 Template:Current EP Ireland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022