Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-01-30/Arbitration report

Arbitration report

New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions

January marked the start of a new term for several arbitrators appointed in the 2021 elections. The election, its outcomes, and the cute photo montage of the new arbs' namesakes can be found in the previous Arbitration Report. So what have they been up to in the last month? A few things, as it turns out. Several cases were declined, a topic ban was lifted, and some old cases were modified. Additionally, a comprehensive review of old discretionary sanctions began, and one case was opened.

Open case: Skepticism and coordinated editing

On 16 January, a case was opened regarding potential issues of coordinated editing by members of at least one group, Guerilla Skepticism on Wikipedia (GSoW), led by Susan Gerbic (who is both a party to the case and the subject of one of the articles involved in the case). I made a preliminary statement in the case urging it to be accepted, which means I will refrain from going off about it at length in the Arbitration Report. The basic issue at hand is whether the activities of the group, which are often conducted in an opaque manner off-wiki, embody conflict-of-interest editing; sources and articles involved include the Skeptical Inquirer, Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, and Center for Inquiry Investigations Group (among others).

Discretionary sanctions review

Several categories of discretionary sanctions are up for review, following a 2021 review of the practice. The discussion, located here, concerns a number of rarely-used sanctions areas, whether they should continue to be covered by DS, and in some cases modifications to existing DS regimes. The sanctions being considered for abolition are:

Scientology (instituted in 2009)
Senkaku Islands (instituted in 2011)
Waldorf education (instituted in 2013)
Ancient Egyptian race controversy (instituted in 2014)
Abolition of DS for Landmark Worldwide (instituted in 2015)
Transcendental Meditation movement (instituted in 2011)

Additionally, some article probation remedies are being considered for abolition. These are:

Remedy 5 ("Mentorship") of the Neuro-linguistic programming case (instituted in 2006)
Remedy 2 ("Article-related Probation") of the Shiloh case (instituted in 2006)
Remedy 2.1 ("Article probation") of the Occupation of Latvia case (instituted in 2007)
Remedy 14.3 ("Articles semi-protected") of the Obama articles case (instituted in 2009)
- Finding of Fact 3 ("Articles placed on probation") of the Obama articles case (instituted in 2008), which was the subject of a 2009 review in Remedy 1.1 ("Article probation review") and addressed by a March 2015 ANI thread

Finally, two DS regimes are being considered for amendment. They are:

Remedy 5 of the India-Pakistan case (instituted in 2012). The current scope is "all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan"; the amendment would expand it to cover "all pages related to political or religious topics and closely related people in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, including but not limited to castes".
DS remedies of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 case (instituted in 2011) would be rescinded, and a remedy added to the case authorizing DS for "all pages related to political or religious topics and closely related people in Armenia and Azerbaijan, including but not limited to the Armenian genocide".

Closed cases and motions

A requested case, Warsaw concentration camp, was declined by the Committee; several motions were nonetheless passed resolving the request and issuing an admonishment to one editor. Jehochman, an administrator and party to the case, requested a voluntary desysopping.
The Scientology case was amended by motion on January 7, with the removal of open-proxy-style blocks on Church of Scientology IP addresses placed in 2009.
Following an amendment request, the committee passed a motion to modify editing restrictions on Crouch, Swale placed in 2019.
A clarification request regarding extended confirmed restrictions, made on January 2, sought to determine whether topic-based EC restrictions placed by the Committee applied to discussions of source reliability, deletion, and the like. Generally, the answer was "yes".
A case request, "Legitimacy about the imposition of never approved rules" (related to political parties in Italy), was declined.
Amortias was re-appointed as a full clerk on December 28.
Atsme's post-WWII anti-fascism in the United States topic ban was provisionally lifted.

Enforcement requests

Nine enforcement requests were closed in January.

"RafaelJC12" (2 January), resolved with the user in question blocked from editing the article Human shield for 61 days
"Encyclopædius (5 January), resolved by indefinite COVID-19 topic ban
"Saad Arshad Butt" (19 January), closed "without comment on the merits, and without prejudice to bring up the same diffs in a future filing if the issues resurface".
"Cygnis insignis" (19 January), resolved with a 96-hour block for 1RR violations and personal attacks.
"Lokeshwaran V R" (22 January), resolved with an indefinite block as a standard administrative action.
"in re Sushant Singh Rajput" (23 January), resolved with Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput protected as a standard administrative action.
"Devesh.bhatta" (26 January), resolved with an indefinite topic ban from articles related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
"Davidbena" (29 January), resolved with a topic ban from Israel-Palestine articles.
"Critchion" (29 January), resolved with an indefinite block as a standard adminstrative action.

Additionally, two enforcement requests are currently open.

"Grandmaster" (opened 23 January).
"Arbitration enforcement action appeal by FDW777" (opened 30 January).

Enforcement actions

So far, there have been 52 actions logged for 2022. They are as follows:

← Previous "Arbitration report"

Next "Arbitration report" →

In this issue

Arbitration report

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

The current scope is "all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan"; the amendment would expand it to cover "all pages related to political or religious topics and closely related people in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, including but not limited to castes". — Isn't that a contraction rather than an expansion? —2d37 (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I believe. I will double-check to make sure. jp×g 22:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost needs your help putting together the next issue.

Home

About