Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia!

Hello, Moe1810, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...
  Be Bold
  Assume Good faith
23   Keep cool
  Share your knowledge
  Have an experenced editor adopt you
  Policy on neutral point of view

And here are several pages on what to avoid:

How to not spam
Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this
Other Useful Links
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome! 


TomasBat 22:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sharon Oreck edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sharon Oreck, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.14womenthemovie.com/filmmakers.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I made some improvements to the article to satisfy the notability and copyvio tags that were on the article. Feel free to take a look and add more to it. This sounds like an interesting person. I couldn't find any basic biographical info (birth date, birth location, etc.) so if you know (or can find) that, would you please add it. Good editing. Truthanado 19:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Joe Gerard edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joe Gerard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Joe Gerard. Ridernyc (talk) 02:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brenda Morgenstern edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brenda Morgenstern, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Brenda Morgenstern. Ridernyc (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:The Rescuers poster 1989.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Rescuers poster 1989.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 02:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Woofer_&_Wimper-Dog_Detectives.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Woofer_&_Wimper-Dog_Detectives.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:A_Flintstone_Christmas.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:A_Flintstone_Christmas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECUtalk 16:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:The_Rescuers_poster_1989.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:The_Rescuers_poster_1989.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:The_Flintstone_Comedy_Show_(1980).jpg edit

I have tagged Image:The_Flintstone_Comedy_Show_(1980).jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Flintstones83-1-.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:Flintstones83-1-.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Fred_Flintstone_and_Friends.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:Fred_Flintstone_and_Friends.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Fred_and_Barney_Meet_the_Thing.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:Fred_and_Barney_Meet_the_Thing.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Galloping_Ghost.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:Galloping_Ghost.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Jabberjaw_and_The_Neptunes.jpg edit

I have tagged Image:Jabberjaw_and_The_Neptunes.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Madonna: Music Video Production Credits edit

 

I have nominated Madonna: Music Video Production Credits, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna: Music Video Production Credits. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Roger Peltz edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roger Peltz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —S Marshall Talk/Cont 17:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Moe1810! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 936 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Gay Hartwig (Autterson) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Mickey Stevens - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mickey Stevens edit

 

The article Mickey Stevens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP on person who had one voice acting gig.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Scary Scooby Funnies intertitle card.jpg.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Scary Scooby Funnies intertitle card.jpg.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Hanna-Barbera 0016.jpg.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Hanna-Barbera 0016.jpg.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Scary Scooby Funnies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:51BfixUSOGL.jpg.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:51BfixUSOGL.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Dallas Reunion- The Return to Southfork.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dallas Reunion- The Return to Southfork.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Dream of Jeannie.jpg.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dream of Jeannie.jpg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Girls in the Office, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Stevens and Tony Roberts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Let's Switch!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sidney Hayers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Forrest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visions of Murder, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Shaw and Michael Rhodes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Laurel Page edit

 

The article Laurel Page has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Young Runaways (1978 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Weber and Walter Barnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Prowlers of the Everglades edit

Hi, I'm Rambunctious Racoon. Moe1810, thanks for creating Prowlers of the Everglades!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Not a bad article by any means, just needs an extra citation and is a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Rambunctious Racoon (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Switch to the Rescue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne Lockhart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Harvey Korman, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Don't add a wikilink to a show that was made in 1978 and will undoubtedly never have an article here. Bbb23 (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (She's in the Army Now) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating She's in the Army Now, Moe1810!

Wikipedia editor LavaBaron just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article. This is critical information we need to get out there to enlighten the masses about the imperialist-militant paradigm. Thank you for working on it.

To reply, leave a comment on LavaBaron's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fred Flintstone and Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Hunt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scooby's All-Star Laff-A-Lympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!! edit

Thanks for improving The Puppy's Further Adventures article as I only had a vague memory of watching the show from when I was a child in the UK. Dwanyewest (talk) 22:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just a thought have you considered doing plot summaries for The Puppy's Further Adventures. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your message!! I'm glad that you like my contributions to The Puppy's Further Adventures. Yes, I think it's a good idea if you wish to include plot summaries to the series!! Also, I sent an e-mail request to Ruby-Spears productions asking their permission to upload an image of The Puppy's Further Adventures title card.

Rosemary's Baby edit

I see that you reverted my change to the hatnotes on Rosemary's Baby (film) and Rosemary's Baby (miniseries). When intentionally linking to a disambiguation page, the link should be piped through the (disambiguation) redirect. This helps those of us at WP:DPL (and the bots that help us) to know that the link is intentional. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 23:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rainbow (1978 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Jessel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Growing Up Brady (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

STOP! edit

There is no consensus for the removal of "American" from the lede of film articles. Identifying the country of origin is absolutely standarde. Please undo your edits. I am starting to roll them back now. BMK (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016 edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Firesign Theatre does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fonz and the Happy Days Gang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Hunt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ready for Math with Pooh edit

 

The article Ready for Math with Pooh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:Notability (video games). References are unreliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte 03:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced content edit

Hi there, please refrain from adding unsourced content to articles as you did here. Even if all those broadcast schedules were appropriate to include in an article, we shouldn't be relying on your memory, rather, the content should be adequately sourced. Unsourced content doesn't make the encyclopedia better or more reliable, and it can be removed. Note also that if you restore unsourced content, the burden is yours to bolster it with references. You should also familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style for Television so that you will be aware of what shape television articles should take, and what sort of information belongs in a TV article. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Laurel Page edit

 

The article Laurel Page has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject has done a few voice-overs. Her acting roles are minor roles. Searches on Google News reveal no significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skr15081997 (talk) 10:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Laurel Page for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurel Page is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Page until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skr15081997 (talk) 10:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sally Struthers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What I Did for Love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Flintstones' 25th Anniversary Celebration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allison Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page Superman III appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Use of edit summaries edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America1000 12:13, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copy and pasting edit

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

http://www.hallmarkchannel.com/for-better-or-for-worse/about

Email did not come through for some reason. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rough Housing (The Facts of Life), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lawlor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: Rough Housing (The Facts of Life) edit

Thank you for starting this article. I hope you don't mind, but I added the article to Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related content as part of an ongoing Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT articles between now and the end of June, feel free to update this page with your contributions. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hanna-Barbera's All-Star Comedy Ice Revue, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Once Upon a Mouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sword in the Stone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan Stores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sackville, Nova Scotia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fever (Little Willie John song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been around Wikipedia for long enough to know not to add content without sources.IB [ Poke ] 09:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit flood edit

Was there a reason for your big edit flood to The Flintstones Comedy Hour page? To me it made no difference and could easily have crashed wikipedia's servers. --PlanetofLinux (talk) 10:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Cool Runnings does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 18:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lucy Lee Flippin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- WV 13:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olivia Barash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repo Man. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Carol Burnett, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Robonic Stooges into The Skatebirds. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016 edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! LadyofShalott 14:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Out of Peekskill for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out of Peekskill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out of Peekskill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! The Old JacobiteThe '45 15:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Tiger Town. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Green Mile (film) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Your refusal to explain your edits by using an edit summary displays contempt for your fellow editors. The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

alt text edit

Hi - You've made some excellent additions to articles related to the American Film Theatre - thanks! However, you deleted the alt caption for the image at Galileo (1975 film). Alt captions are intended for visually impaired readers, and they describe the image itself. I'll restore the original text. See Wikipedia:Alternative text for images for additional information. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 00:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Moe1810. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#User:Moe1810 edit

Hi there, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#User:Moe1810 a user has expressed some frustration with your general lack of communication. This is a collaborative project and it's vital that you explain your edits in edit summaries so that other editors can understand the rationale for your changes, and it's equally important that you engage in discussions on talk pages, especially when making controversial changes, or after being reverted. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Madonna: Tears of a Clown, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —IB [ Poke ] 14:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem on Gone Dark edit

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fred and Barney Meet the Thing.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fred and Barney Meet the Thing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ana Alicia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 06:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Moe1810. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rob Stone (actor) edit

Hello Moe1810,

What is your reliable source for changing Rob Stone's date of birth? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 18:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help reconstructing a filmography page edit

Hi, Moe1810,

If able, can you possibly help with the completion of a filmography page? The Earl Holliman filmography needs to be finished with the table format for his TV/self appearances and his rewards as well. I've been trying to finish it from example but I can't seem to hit the nail on the head (plus being at war with a cold doesn't help). If you can do that and help his page out it would be much appreciated. Hope you can help.Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help Please edit

Can you help me with the Andrea King filmography page? I'm having trouble with the table format again (please/thank you). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black BIC Ballpoint (talkcontribs) 17:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harper Valley PTA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sock It To Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits edit

Hi, I'm LovelyLillith. I really appreciate your help and prolific edits, but you might want to consider not marking EVERY edit you make as minor, as well as adding an edit summary. WP:ME can tell you more, but basically anything that is adding information to an article (vs. fixing a typo, date, moving a picture, etc.) would NOT be considered a minor edit. I saw a number of edits you've made with content that does not fit the "minor" classification, so please mark those items properly with a summary in the future. Cheers, LovelyLillith (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Saint in Manhattan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018 edit

  Some of the content you included in Wild Horses (1985 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Margaret Hamilton (actress), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization Talk 19:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The section from which you removed content is titled Complete filmography, not Notable filmography. This means that titles listed there need not be notable according to Wikipedia's definition. Please stop removing items from complete filmographies and other lists that are not limited to notable content just because (I assume) they are not linked to a Wikipedia article. General Ization Talk 19:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Some Filmography Page Cleanups (and Help) Requested Please edit

Moe,

When you can, I would love it if you could help reformat the following filmography pages (I've had trouble with myself doing):

Also, on the Wiki pages of Warren Stevens and Mitchell Ryan their filmographies need both completion and re-organizing to make them whole (I tried too but they keep getting reverted back again for whatever reason). It would be greatly appreciated and I so appreciate the extra set of hands to help makes these pages more updated not to mention more organized and orderly. Thank you!I'm Listening to 80s Music (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 2 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ray Milland filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Moe1810, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Wilde Girls have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Moe1810. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ken Barry edit

Regarding this edit please review WP:DATERANGE. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 21:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can you please fix it ? - FlightTime (open channel) 21:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Wilde Girls for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Wilde Girls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wilde Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 04:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lane Caudell edit

 

The article Lane Caudell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Help with formation of filmography page edit

Good afternoon, Moe,

I came by to ask you too help me fix the formatting for a filmography page; in particular, Earl Holliman filmography. If you could help format the section for his awards and unmade films into the same context as his Film and Episodic credits are now, that would not only make the page more orderly but make it more complete in terms of appearances and formation. I hope you can help me maneuver this because it would help me out a lot and do his page more clean and organization justice. Please help me with the formatting whenever possible as I have had such a headache trying to figure it out on my own. Thank you in advance and have a nice rest of your day.I'm Listening to 80s Music (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Potential Assistance edit

Good Afternoon, Moe,

I wanted to drop a line to you in asking if you maybe able too assist fixing a filmography. That would coincide with the actress Marie Windsor who would have turned 100 come tomorrow. On her Wiki page, her filmography is listed and it is in need of some repair. If you could help format her list of film and TV appearances into a table format collectively that would be amazing, more organized, and make her page more attractive and organized in honor for her centennial tomorrow. I hope you will be able too contribute your expertise and talents unto her in this tribute too her on her would have been birthday. Thank you for your time, consideration, and may you enjoy a pleasant-relaxing Holiday Season.--Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 18:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mass edits edit

It might be a good idea to seek consensus for the mass edits you are engaging in. I'd argue that appending "television series" to every occurrence of sitcom is unnecessary; while a sitcom isn't strictly a television series by definition, that's the overwhelming commonly understood usage. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Psycho IV: The Beginning, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Please provide sources for your genre edits. They are at least at odds with Allmovie's categorizations. DonIago (talk) 12:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Flintstones, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 15:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cloris Leachman credits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Help with Filmography Page edit

If able, would you be able to help re-organize and re-format the newley created Peter Haskell filmography page? It would be so helpful and much appreciated, thanks in advance.--Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 13:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of A Snow Capped Christmas edit

 

The article A Snow Capped Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 15:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Perfect Match (2015 film) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perfect Match (2015 film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Match (2015 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Barbara Eden edit

When updating someone's stat's it's a good practace to also update the reference link, which shows other editors the change is most likely valid. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Sundayclose. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Betty White filmography. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Sundayclose (talk) 01:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop marking all edits as minor edit

  Hi Moe1810! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marie (TV pilot) edit

 

The article Marie (TV pilot) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found for this pilot which never became a series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Moe1810! edit

Thank you and Happy New Year to you too!!! Moe1810 (talk) 23:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 22:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply