DEADLINE FOR FIRST 500 WORDS NOT MET. - Shirin--Shirin tejani (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article selection on RRBs ok. AFTER DEADLINE. -Shirin--Shirin tejani (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Where is your article selection for ESS innovative? - Shirin (09 August 2011)


Hi!

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content

naveenpf (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Mahima.chawla and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gsinghglakes (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Gsinghglakes (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

CSR

edit

WHERE IS THE ARTICLE ON CSR?U R RUNNING BEHIND SCHEDULESukalpachakrabarti (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC)SC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukalpachakrabarti (talkcontribs) 09:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but I'm afraid that some of the content you have added to Regional Rural Bank is against our copyright policies.

In brief, aside from limited and clearly marked quotations, we cannot copy content from any prior publication unless we can prove that it is public domain or compatibly licensed. Most content on the internet is copyrighted, even if it is not marked. Under the US law that governs us, copyright is automatic. If we can prove that content is public domain or compatibly licensed, we can copy it, but we have to note that it is copied to comply with Wikipedia:Plagiarism.

For example, I see that in this edit, you copied content from the description of the book Regional Rural Banks in India ([1]). This has had to be removed.

Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the policies and guidelines to which it links to make sure that you are clear on how to use previously published text. If you have any questions, you are welcome to come by my talk page, or your ambassador may be able to assist. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to let you know that a lot of other content has had to be removed from the article because another user copied it from [2]. Unfortunately, this set the article back a good ways in terms of development. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I'm afraid that proper paraphrasing on Wikipedia requires actually writing content in your own words. You do not seem to have done this. In this edit, you added the following text:

RRBs have been established with a view to provide banking services to the rural masses and extending wide variety of financial assistance to the weaker and poorer sections of the rural society.RRBs have been viewed as an important instrument for serving the weaker sections of the society.

This page says:

RRBs have been established with a view to provide banking services to the rural masses and extending wide variety of financial assistance to the weaker and poorer sections of the rural society.RRBs have been viewed as an important instrument for serving the weaker sections of the society.

As I mentioned above, this article is also hurt by the fact that a contributor before you copied extensively from another source as well.
I'm sorry, but I cannot help you develop the article, beyond giving you some suggestions for how content needs to be written. Learning how to completely change source material so that it is not a copyright problem or a plagiarism issue can be very challenging. Basically, on Wikipedia, you cannot copy any text that was published previously. There are two exceptions to this: (1) you can copy brief excerpts as clearly marked quotations provided that you give a good reference, that you mention in your text where you got it and that you use it for good reasons. (Wikipedia is bound by United States copyright law, and the US allows fair use quotations if you have good reason to copy content--such as to illustrate a particular point of view.) (2) you can copy as much of you want of content that is public domain or compatibly licensed so long as you give full attribution as explained at Wikipedia:Plagiarism. (Many people think being published in public - such as on the web - makes content public domain. This is not so. Content becomes public domain when its copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author in most cases) or if it is explicitly released. For instance, the United States government has explicitly released copyright on its content, although many governments do not.)
Examples

An example of a brief and clearly marked quotation, used for good reason:

According to biographer John Smith, Jane Doe was "a woman of great integrity, regardless of the provocation".[1]

Sometimes people copy text into quotation marks just because they can't think of another way to put it. It's better to avoid this. Quotes should usually be used where there is good reason, as with this case where we are conveying somebody's opinion.

An example of proper attribution of a public domain text:

  This article incorporates text from The Book of Ages, by Fred Tucker, a publication from 1900, now in the public domain in the United States.

(I used a "template" to make that, so I didn't have to type it all. That one comes from Template:PD-old-text.) If you use a lot of the text, you'd put a note at the top of the reference section. Otherwise, you'd put it in the footnote. If that comes up, I can tell you easily how to do it.

Outside of those two cases, you need to make sure that the language and structure of your work is your own. You cannot use striking or distinctive phrases from your sources, and you should ideally not draw too much information from any one source. I would recommend that you read through Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, as this page can be very helpful in overcoming the trickiest part of rewriting content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello from your Campus Ambassador

edit

Vedant and I ( Gurmeet) are the Campus Ambassadors for your Class for the Wikipedia Education Program. Please feel free to reach out to any of us.

Enjoy editing...! Regards, Gurmeet Gsinghglakes (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article Review

edit

Hey Mahima,

I saw your contibs to the article Forex swap. Unfortunately it was not an encyclopedic format. It was more like an essay. Here are a few links to help you write a good article, please go through them.

You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page.

As per your sandbox article, it too has the same issue. Firstly, you need to give proper references to support your articles. Check out .

Hey, don't get discouraged. Do keep editing in your sandbox article, we will help you all the way, check out these to help you , . I am sure you will be soon be fluent with editing, here's another link to help. Help:Editing. Hope you have a lovely time editing in Wikipedia.

Regards, Your friendly neighbourhood Campus Ambassador,

"Lets make this world a better and more informative place"

Debastein1 (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mahima, if you have anything to discuss with me, please leave a message on my talk page and not on my User page. Please check out . For any additional help, do check out, Wikipedia:India Education Program/Courses/Fall 2011/Economics of the Social Sector Year 2 Group A/Help Centre. --Debastein1 (talk) 20:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply