M@sk

Welcome!

Hello, M@sk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kukini 06:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Bridges

I see you've been working on several articles about bridges in Saskatoon and elsewhere in Canada. If you're interested, you might want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges, which is a project to standardize articles about bridges and improve the quality of those articles. I've been working on Minnesota bridges as part of the project (although I should probably take a break; I've probably edited about 40 bridge articles today.) Check it out! --Elkman - ^(talk) 03:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I fixed up the Victoria bridge article and will do the other in the next day or two. Thanks for the tip. --M@sk 00:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Saskatoon bridges

Good work so far on the bridges articles. Please take a moment to make note of changes I and others have made regarding grammar and spelling in the articles. Assuming that you will be creating articles on each bridge, please note that I have added one bridge to the list at the main Saskatoon article -- the Grand Trunk rail bridge -- plus the Idylwyld Bridge was renamed the Sidney L. Buckwold Bridge about 6 years ago so I have changed this accordingly in the article. Cheers. 23skidoo 06:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the additions and edits. It will probably be a few days before they all apear but that was my plan. --M@sk 00:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Categories

Please don't apply Category:Saskatchewan to articles that are already in subcategories such as Category:Universities and colleges in Saskatchewan — the whole idea behind subcategories is to keep them as uncluttered as possible by only applying the narrowest appropriate categories, rather than some recursive stack of duplicated categories. Bearcat 02:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Sports in Saskatchewan

Can you improve/edit/update this new article please? Sports in Saskatchewan I see you have edited articles about Griffiths Stadium in SK. TXS SriMesh | talk 06:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

An Invite to join Saskatchewan WikiProject

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 06:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Saskatoon John G. Diefenbaker International Airport

There are now images in a gallery on the talk page of this article. If they are of any use in the article... I noticed you were adding info to airline articles...SriMesh | talk 05:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Forestry Farm Park and Zoo

I don't have any good photos as of the moment, but t'would make a wonderful trip this week-end. 'Tis fun to put photos of Saskatoon online, some better than others, but I enjoy it. Digital cameras are fun. Will contact you after I pop out there. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

There are some photos at Forestry Farm Park and Zoo, hope some can be stuffed into the article you started which has a wonderful beginning BTW!! Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

Delivered the June newsletter to show announcement of spotlight award, sign up to Wikiproject Saskatchewan for more issues is you would like to keep receiving them. SriMesh | talk 00:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry that you received two issues of the newsletter, there was a glitch in the bot delivery system, which caused June to be delayed, and so a hand delivery and a bot delivery both were sent out. SriMesh | talk 17:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Saskatoon Club

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Saskatoon Club, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I've restored the article for the time being. It will, however, require more proof of its notability than its age and mere existence. I work with the US National Register of Historic Places - what is the Canadian equivalent? Right now, it seems unremarkable, and others agree. There needs to be some historic event, historic register, or a similar distinction.

You've done a great deal of good work, but keep in mind that Wikipedia can be a tough environment - the editors who tagged and deleted the article were correct to do so, but I believe the article can be improved and saved if there are appropriate sources. Please do not allow your frustration to lead you to placing inappropriate messages in article space. Acroterion _(talk) 17:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Saskatoon Club

I have nominated Saskatoon Club, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatoon Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Contributions

I do hope you will consider continuing on Wikipedia. Saskatoon Club comment. You have contributed valuable insight, and articles to wikipedia as a whole, and the silly AfD's are part of the growing pains of Wikipedia establishing credibility in general on the internet. As was noted by several folks who are more familiar with Saskatoon and Saskatchewan, the discussion showed support of your work. I am sorry, I was sick and with mom at hospital during this time, or I would also have added my two cent worth as well. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		I SriMesh do hereby acknowledge your excellent contributions to Saskatchewan, its Crown Corporations, and Historic buildings. Good work

Thanks for the support, I will continue to make my contribution. Hope things are well with you and family. --M@sk (talk) 03:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 7 - July 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 12:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Invite To WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods

Hey, I notice you are member of WP: Sask. Well, I am hereby inviting you to WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods. If you decide to join, we look forward to welcoming to you to the project. Mr. C.C. (talk) 02:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 8 - August 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 22:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 9 - September 2008

→ Apologies for the late delivery, there has been extended network problems on the bot's server over the last few days.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 09:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 10 - October 2008

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Enerjet

A tag has been placed on Enerjet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Another nomination for deletion. I do question why I should contribute to this community when attempts to do so discouraged in this way. Have a look at the talk page for this article. What criteria do we have on Wikipedia for adding pages about airlines .... --M@sk (talk) 13:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

See WP:Notability, WP:Notability (companies). In the case of companies, as in the case of several other classes of topic, the article needs to *indicate* that the topic is notable. This article doesn't, and the likelihood that an airline with a single plane is notable seems small. Regarding the value of contributing to this community: I think it's good that the community is concerned with working toward a quality encyclopedia. Guidelines have been established by consensus to help with this by preventing it from becoming a repository for advertising, advocacy, personal reflection, and so forth, and by preventing large amounts of space by being taken up by topics of relatively little value. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

What criteria do you propose? Two aircraft? 10? 100? Do you want to weight average a a Boeing 737 is equivalent to 4-5 props or 1/2 a wide-body? --M@sk (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

There is no official threshold based on number of planes or weight. I cited the possession by the company of a single aircraft as an indication that notability is unlikely. For the most part, someone's purchase of some property (a plane, a taxi, a restaurant, an apartment building) for use in earning a living isn't a topic suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.

I answered your previous question about the applicable criteria by providing you with links to two relevant articles. The answers are there. Please read them instead of trying to turn this into a confrontation between you and me. You might also look at WP:Welcome and WP:First article.—Largo Plazo (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

When deleting the article you also missed the reference on the Edmonton Airport page. I was going to add a reference on the Fort McMurray airport page however there is little point in doing that at this point since the airline clearly does not warrant mention on Wikipedia.

I hope you don't take this as an attack on you. It is not. In the past few months I have had three articles including this one nominated for speedy deletion. In each case we have people waist their time debating the merits of deleting the article and then the article is reinstated. At this point I give up. Clearly the Wikipedia community does not appreciate the effort some of us have put in to making this encyclopedia more complete. You should note, I waited until they received Transport Canada approval before adding them, since once they are licensed there is some substance behind them. Perhaps I should have waited until they announced taking delivery of their second aircraft or third aircraft.... In any case at this point I will leave it to someone else to add it the article once it meets the high standard for notability that appears to be required. I would have assumed including them on the list of Canadian Airlines is something that Wikipedia would defer to Transport Canada, but it is probably best to be notable in these cases instead of complete. --M@sk (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 11 - November 2008

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 06:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 12 - December 2008

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 1 - January 2009

|}

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 3 - March 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 01:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 4 - April 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 5 - May 2009

|}

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 6 - June 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 23:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 7 - July 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 8 - August 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 09:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 9 - Saskatchewan 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter:
: Volume 3, Issue 10 - October 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 07:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 11 - November 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 01:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Railway stations

If you are going to be creating more of these pages, you really should apply for |autoreviewer status. Eeekster (talk) 03:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter:
: Volume 3, Issue 12 - December 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Railway stations

Hi there! I'm glad to see someone has taken an interest in historic Canadian railway stations. However, I've noticed that you've gone around and tagged a bunch of stations as being "national historic sites" that are really "designated heritage railway stations". There is a difference, and WP is the kind of place where we care about those kinds of little errors. Just a heads up. Otherwise, keep up the good work! --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 03:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm here about the same issue, as there are a number of "stations" added which are only flagstops - not even a building, just a spot where the train will stop (if asked). Even with larger towns than Cedarvale, British Columbia, e.g. Houston and Smithers, there's no need at all for a separate "station" article, the category can simply be added to the town article. Unless there's a notable building I see no reason whatsoever for "Houston (British Columbia) railway station", Cedarvale railway station, Telkwa railway station. All such articles should be merged with their placename counterparts, as they have no valid reason to exist; architectural, historical significance etc are why they would be notable enough to have separate articles; but even in Silverdale railway station (again just a flagstop, but where Billy Miner robbed the train]], there's no need for a separate article from Silverdale, British Columbia. Also there are doubled articles - there's already Boston Bar adn North Bend station articles without the VIA name in their title and they should be merged with the ones you've created; in those two cases, North Bend in particular, there were (and maybe still are, abandoned or in ruins) actual railway station buildings.Skookum1 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, Mission Harbour railway station got me curious, as the source says it's on Harbour Avenue in Mission, which is the waterfront; I haven't be in the home burg for a while but I can't see where this station would be, or what service it would be a station on, as the rail line adjacent to Harbour Avenue is the connector line to Abbotsford that uses the rail bridge. The old Mission CPR station, now a museum/cultural centre SFAIK, is on Railway Avenue, a couple of blocks west of teh West Coast Express station...but nowhere near Harbour Avenue.Skookum1 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Edmonton railway station

I have nomed this page for renaming. Just a heads up. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Ferries in Saskatchewan

I notice that you are creating lots of stub articles about ferries in Saskatchewan. They may be better as one page titled Ferries of Saskatchewan rather than having all the stub article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter February 2010

Last edition  · Next edition

Hello and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter! I, User:Presidentman, am the new editor. You may see some changes due to the fact it's my first newsletter. I'm just going easy on myself, but it will get more complex as time goes on.

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 13 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Welcome We’re excited to announce that User:Presidentman has joined WikiProject Saskatchewan as our Editor in Chief. Presidentman will oversee editorial content and the Saskatchewan Wikiproject community contributions on the Wikiproject newsletter. Presidentman has also successfully developed the Picture of the Day project and has been active on wikipedia for close to three years in a plethora of projects enriching wikipedia with close to 3,000 contributions. The transition between our old editor and the new has been smoother than any of us could have hoped for — SriMesh wrote their last newsletter article for January, 2010, and Presidentman started up without missing a beat for February 2010. The previous years for SriMesh, the past editor, had been richly rewarding, seeing subscriptions grow, informing interested editors of developments and changes to the Saskatchewan wikipedia community and supporting activities on the Saskatchewan Wikiproject. It is now time for me to move to new writing projects to finish, and further responsibilities which are vying for my attention. Please join me in welcoming Presidentman to the their new position! Presidentman is working on a host of new features and an updated look, which will take things to a new level. It is wonderful to have a new editor to bring in the new year! Expect great things. Welcome Presidentman, and best wishes! Your wonderful act of kindness to take on editorial capacity of the Saskatchewan Wikiproject news letter is much appreciated! Thank you so much!!! Kind Regards, SriMesh | talk 18:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 01:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter March 2010

Last issue  · Next issue

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 13 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Rocky Mountaineer

You have created articles for dozens of railway stations throughout western Canada and now you are doing some for Rocky Mountaineer. For VIA you used "Infobox station" but for RM you are using "Infobox Historic building". Was there some reason for this? I have changed the infobox for Rocky Mountaineer Station and created a Rocky Mountaineer style. The gold colour is exactly the same as the logo, which I have also uploaded. The style can be changed if you think it is not suitable. Thanks for the work you have done. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter June 2010

Last edition  · Next edition

Hello, and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Sorry about the last two months, I have just been very busy with exams and the end of my studies. Now that summer is here, hopefully I'll do better.

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Why? Why? Why?

I created Template:Rocky Mountaineer style, while you in your great wisdom following on behind decided to name your templates "RockyMountaineer" (without the space) WTF? The article is Rocky Mountaineer. I have now renamed that first template to match as Template:RockyMountaineer style. Please change any new infoboxes. Are you going to create North Vancouver railway station? Thanks for all your work anyway. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that I don't know what I was thinking. I should have made the names consistent with the one you started. I am going to create a North Vancouver Station article. --M@sk (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

What is the Whistler Mountaineer? Should that article be renamed Whistler Sea to Sky Climb? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

At one point in time the run up to Whistler was advertised and sold as the Whistler Mountaineer. I need to check to see if they are still doing that. I don't think so. --M@sk (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I notice you have also named all the RM routes in the succession boxes in the station infoboxes without spaces. You should use the full correct name as on the website. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter July 2010

Last edition  · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Canada Day to all!

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

Happy Canada Day July 1 is Canada Day! Everyone have a happy Canada Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter August 2010

Last edition  · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Saskatchewan Day to all!

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

lnik= Happy Saskatchewan Day August 2 is Saskatchewan Day! Everyone have a Happy Saskatchewan Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter September 2010

Last edition  · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Labour Day to all!

Newsletter archives Newsletter archives are listed since the conception of the wikiproject and show the evolution of Saskatchewan WikiProject and Saskatchewan articles on Wikipedia. Please feel free to contribute to the Next Issue! Any and all contributions are welcome.

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football helmet Photo taken by DoubleBlue Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 46 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Saskatchewan Roughriders Canadian football stadium Photo taken by Royalguard11 Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

Happy Labour Day September 6 is Labour Day! Everyone have a happy Labour Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 06:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Yorath Island

You've linked to Cottonwood, but this is a disambig page, just letting you know seeing as you are the only contributor. Thanks, ConconJondor (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Citations

I made a few edits to Yorath Island, which included rewriting the references. You can go to edit mode to see exactly what I did. I recommend you have a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates - a particularly useful one is {{cite web}}. Not only do they make the references clearer, they also assist bots that look for dead links and salvage the reference with archive URLs. In the meantime, keep up the good work! --Drm310 (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Also, if you want to re-use an existing citation further down the page, here's how to do it:

1. In the first instance of the citation, make sure it has a name enclosed in quotes, e.g. <ref name="citation1">{{cite web ...
2. Further instances of the citation can be used with this syntax: <ref name="citation1" />

Note the use of quotes, the space after and the trailing slash. That's the proper syntax so you don't need the </ref> tag. In the Reflist, the citation will appear with small letters (e.g. ab), where each one will jump to the appropriate place where the citation was used. You can read more about it at WP:REFNAME... hope that helps. --Drm310 (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello M@sk! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

What's going on here?

Looking at this edit, where you add Queen Elizabeth II Court in Regina to a list of structures named after Queen Elizabeth II, is there anything odd about it, causing another editor to revert you twice? It seems pretty straightforward to me, and I'm always keen on defending good work. --Pete (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Not certain what the problem is. Thanks for point that out..... M@sk (talk) 02:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I just wanted to check in case I'd missed something. I've added a few more Canadian buildings named after the Queen, fixed a redlink or two. --Pete (talk) 02:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Avord Tower

Hello, M@sk, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Avord Tower, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! noq (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of C.M. Fines Building

The article C.M. Fines Building has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of University Heights Square

The article University Heights Square has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of University Heights Square for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University Heights Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Heights Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kindersley Mall

The article Kindersley Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sufficient notable independent, substantive, multiple RS coverage of the notability of this 15-store, 131,000 sf mall on gnews or gbooks. Though it does have run-of-the-mill coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi M@sk,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Qwanlin Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qwanlin Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qwanlin Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello

You, being the main contributor to List of mines in Canada, might be interested in my pet-project to organize, begin and determine lists of missing mines. I've created this userpage: User:ncboy2010/mines to attempt to organize what we do and don't have. Please take a look at that and let me know if there are anything I might be missing. The reason I ask you is because your one of the only other wikipedians who's worked on a list of mines before me. Thanks for any input! Ncboy2010 (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Temple REIT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheraton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Salmo railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Algoma Central Templates

I have redirected the Algoma Central succession templates to CN to be more inclusive. Another line Canadian National Railway operates is the Kaoham Shuttle in BC. Do you know of any more? This system can also be used for defunct or historic CN lines. It also seems more logical when AC now shows up as a line of the CN system, when previously it was a one-trick pony. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Agawa Canyon railway station

What was wrong with Canyon (Agawa) railway station? Don't start making "stations" out of every flag stop and siding. It is just not helpful and they are not notable or stations. This Schedule show the difference. Notice Canyon station. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

p.s. The station is in Canyon, Algoma District. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduroam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Mary's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nipawin, Saskatchewan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cumberland College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Innovation Saskatchewan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airlines#Deletion_of_airline_articles

Have you attempted to contact the user? Ask him for clarification and re-create the articles after he tells you how to remedy it. Since they say "A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" you ask him how it did not fulfill A7 and What you need to do to recreate the articles. You here to learn from this. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Manitoba railway

Hi Mask. I hope you don't mind this out of the blue question, but I'm not sure who else to ask…

I was flying from Toronto to Vancouver to do some skiing a few years back and I looked out the window to see what was clearly an abandoned railway line running to the northeast. This was way out in the middle of nowhere just after crossing the Ontario border (great view of the locks at the Sault as well!). There were no towns anywhere.. It paralleled the line to Churchill in basic direction. But this was much further south, I think I was basically parallel to Winnipeg.

Do any of your sources mention an abandoned line in that region?

Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of South Hill Mall (Prince Albert)

The article South Hill Mall (Prince Albert) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall. We don't generally have articles for malls of this small size, as generally they are not viewed as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Town 'N' Country Mall

The article Town 'N' Country Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 30-store mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Luther Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luther Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luther Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ntb613 (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Retrocom Mid-Market Real Estate Investment Trust

The article Retrocom Mid-Market Real Estate Investment Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable investment trust. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, M@sk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of VersaBank

The article VersaBank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to cite references and fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, M@sk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Health regions of Saskatchewan has been nominated for discussion

Category:Health regions of Saskatchewan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Planet S for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planet S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet S until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Yanke Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yanke Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanke Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BonkHindrance (talk) 03:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Finger station

Hello, M@sk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finger station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Budd station

Hello, M@sk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Budd station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Finger station

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Finger station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Budd station

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budd station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Finger station

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Finger station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Budd station

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budd station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Silcox station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silcox station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silcox station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Silcox (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wilde station

The article Wilde station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Turnbull station

The article Turnbull station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rawebb station

The article Rawebb station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Odhill station

The article Odhill station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of O'Day station

The article O'Day station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M'Clintock station

The article M'Clintock station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lamprey station

The article Lamprey station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Halcrow station

The article Halcrow station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Earchman station

The article Earchman station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charlebois station

The article Charlebois station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Button station

The article Button station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Back station

The article Back station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arnot station

The article Arnot station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Arnot station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnot station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnot station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Back station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Back station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Button station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Button station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bylot station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bylot station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bylot station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bridgar station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridgar station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgar station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lyddal station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyddal station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyddal station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Luke station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Leven station (Manitoba) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leven station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leven station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of La Perouse station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Perouse station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Perouse station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kettle Rapids station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kettle Rapids station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kettle Rapids station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hockin station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hockin station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hockin station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Dyce station (Manitoba) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dyce station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyce station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Dunlop station (Manitoba) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunlop station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlop station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nonsuch station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nonsuch station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonsuch station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)