User talk:Lynbarn/archive/012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
L&B updates
No problem. Another one that is commonly believed to have 'come down in the weather' was the old sheds at WB - that was definitely caused by sledge hammers..... Anyhow, happy new year to you too, don't know how soon I might do an EA page, but I'll certainly try and help you keep all the existing pages acurate in the mean time. Nikb01 (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Tennant
FYI, rumours regarding David Tennant's personal life have been a problem with respect to that article for years now. While many IPs and new editors have added text about it, there has not yet been a reliable enough source to support keeping the material. Before removing the Mail link (it was added elsewhere earlier today), I did review it and also searched Wikipedia for past discussions regarding the Daily Mail as a reliable source. An extensive discussion appears to have developed the conclusion that it is best to ensure that the Mail is not the only source we're using; that is to say, if another reliable source (not the Sun or other tabs) publishes the same information, we can proceed. Keep in mind that, given Tennant's popularity, there should be wide-spread coverage in Britain if it is in fact real. We lose nothing by waiting a few days to see what turns up. --Ckatzchatspy 10:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for this - and for the history of edits to the article. I take your point about reliability, but there is also an article on the Daily Telegraph web site, and I heard it mentioned on ITV this morning. I have joined in the discussion on the David tennant talk page. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 12:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
File:L&Bblackmoor.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:L&Bblackmoor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Part 1 Section 12 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 [1] states that:
- (1) The following provisions have effect with respect to the duration of copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. Duration of copyright in literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works
- (2) Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the author dies, subject as follows.
- (3) If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires -
- (a) at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work was made, or
- (b) if during that period the work is made available to the public, at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which it is first so made available,
- (3) If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires -
- This image of a Lynton & Barnstaple railway station was first published in England as part of a series in 1903/04 and the author (or authors) of this hand-coloured monochrome photograph is unknown.
- On this basis, I believe this work is free of copyright restriction, and therefore can be used on Wikipedia. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- File confirmed as PD, and has now been loaded into wiki commons Lynbarn (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
File:L&Bbratton.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:L&Bbratton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Part 1 Section 12 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 [2] states that:
- (1) The following provisions have effect with respect to the duration of copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. Duration of copyright in literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works
- (2) Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the author dies, subject as follows.
- (3) If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires -
- (a) at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work was made, or
- (b) if during that period the work is made available to the public, at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which it is first so made available,
- (3) If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires -
- This image of a Lynton & Barnstaple railway station was first published in England as part of a series in 1903/04 and the author (or authors) of this hand-coloured monochrome photograph is unknown.
- On this basis, I believe this work is free of copyright restriction, and therefore can be used on Wikipedia. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- File confirmed as PD, and has now been loaded into wiki commons Lynbarn (talk) 21:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
marking edits minor
You appear to be marking all your edits as minor - edits such as this and this, where you removed paragraphs are definately not minor. You may want to check if you've not accidently selected the "mark all edits minor by default" box on your preferences by accident. Thanks.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Nigel Ish, Thanks for pointing that out - Sorry, I had checked the box. I'll watch out for that in the future. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Timothy
There seems to be no chance at agreement so I started an entry at RfD: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 12#Timothy --JaGatalk 17:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
Much appreciated!
Thank you very much for your help on the article page of Sembawang Air Base (old RAF Sembawang). Also, could I interest you to look it over at Seletar Airport (RAF Seletar), Changi Air Base (RAF Changi) and Tengah Air Base (RAF Tengah) too? Cheers! --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 04:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- I only have any first-hand knowledge of RAF Changi, from around 1966-68(I was 8-9 at the time!), but I've added the others to my watchlist and I'll see what I can add. Thanks, Lynbarn (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Moving on, I'm looking for sources to cite the stowage of 48× Red Beard (nuclear weapon) at RAF Tengah... can you help? Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 18:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is this any help, or have you already seen these? [3][4][5] Also, see Handley Page Victor Note 30. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Again, you've been such a great help. Cheers~! --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 01:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Is this any help, or have you already seen these? [3][4][5] Also, see Handley Page Victor Note 30. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Convert tags
I've corrected some convert tags in de Havilland Mosquito. DexDor (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 81aff2dea3ed6849bf783f2da68eb293
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
RAF Kingsnorth
There was a RAF Kingsnorth in WWI. It was originally a RFC/RNAS station, which became a RAF station in 1918, and closed in 1919. See RAF Kingsnorth for details. Mjroots (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, MJRoots, but have you any references to confirm that? There was a RNAS base, and it became RAF in 1918, but I'm not sure it was ever called "RAF Kingsnorth". I believe it was always RAF policy never to use the same name twice for different locations (although sometimes, location had several RAF names). I may be wrong, but I have so far seen no formalreference to "RAF Kingsnorth" in WW1. I have started a discussion about this on Talk:RAF Kingsnorth which may be the best place to explore the possibilities further? Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Re-The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 vote of March 18
It was meant as a news building/sources to be added as proper content later by me/other users.
"You mention that Russia and Germany are pro-Libya - do you mean pro-Gaddafi?"- I agree, it's a more spot on and accurate term for my point.
The "sides" was my own POV and was not to be article added unlike the rest.
Thanks for adding "pro-Gaddafi" to all 5 of my page entries. I was just going to correct them and found you had done it already. :-)Wipsenade (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Isn't this table something more suitable for your sandbox? The key information is already in another article, using a well established format: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Ok, if it's already there then no problem. I got it as news broke when I turned on my TV this morning. I the Googled up stuff. It was new and I thought I was first. If others got there first, I did not notice it. I just thought the main nations were mentioned, not places like Gabon to. It appears my notice was not a news exclusive, but out of date by several hours. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. Wipsenade (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)