User talk:L235/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Technical Barnstar |
| Thanks for the edit you made to Module:Protected edit request for me! Would not have been able to do it myself. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 03:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC) |
Excelencia in Education
Hi Kevin, I saw your message after I emailed you. Can you indicate which passages are the "significant text that was copied from copyrighted sources."? That would be very helpful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venndiagram8 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
I have also reposted the article to my sandbox if that is easier for you to indicate what your specific objections are so I can remedy them. This is a very prominent organization in improving enrollment and graduation rates for Latino students. Is that part of your objection? I did look at UNCF's article and tried to model after that. Thanks for any help you can give me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Venndiagram8/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venndiagram8 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Venndiagram8: There are two problems of immediate note. The first is that the page is still currently wholly written in a promotional tone. Please see WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NPOV, and (most easy to digest) this essay on what constitutes a neutral point of view. An article can be written from a promotional tone even if all the statements within it are factual. Please also see MOS:WORDS (I suspect these examples will help a lot if you're confused). The second is that the draft currently copies substantial portions of text from multiple copyrighted sources, including [1], [2], and [3], among others. You can see a comparison report here. Each of these reasons is independently sufficient to delete even sandbox articles.
- Before you spend more time working on this article, also take a moment to review WP:NCORP, Wikipedia's guideline for which organizations should be included with a Wikipedia article. I haven't assessed whether this organization is notable under that standard, but you should to avoid any situation where you find the article deleted even after the other problems have been fixed. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
THANKS Kevin!! This is very helpful. May I make some significant changes and have you review again? In terms of notability, I think they qualify, so I will proceed adjusting the language and investigating those copyright issues. I will let you know when it is ready. Very much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venndiagram8 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Kevin, I believe I have successfully neutralized the tone. Because this is a non-profit, I wasn't really thinking about "promotion" when I posted so thanks so much for your detailed explanation. Double checking the copyright issues now too. If you have a second, I would really appreciate your taking a look at my sandbox again. Specific question - I copied the format for other similar "minority" advancement nonprofits which is why I included "recognition". Is it okay to leave that or is that too "promotional" as well. Thx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venndiagram8 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Venndiagram8: I generally refrain from reviewing drafts on which I have previously taken action. To obtain review from an independent reviewer, copy the following code to the top of the draft:
{{subst:submit}}. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venndiagram8 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Old SPI
Hi, Kevin,
I was doing some work and found an old SPI case that seems to have fallen through the cracks and not archived: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RafikiSykes. I didn't know what to do about it so I just thought I'd alert you and as a clerk you'd know what steps to take. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
User talk:L325
When I say an account is a checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts, it's based on my own work. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon Invitation
Kevin, we're having another Edit-a-thon at UNI! We'll be focusing our editing efforts on people of color. We would love to have you and any other IA Wikipedians join us. Here is a link to the event in the Outreach Dashboard. --ActionableIdeas (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- @ActionableIdeas: I will unfortunately be out of town (I currently attend an out-of-state university) but I'm sending this to all the Iowa Wikipedians I know
Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's wonderful! Thank you, Kevin! --ActionableIdeas (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Napue v. Illinois
The article Napue v. Illinois you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Napue v. Illinois for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of White whirlwind -- White whirlwind (talk) 18:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be <10/0/2>?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Apologies
I guess I knew you something. Sorry about that I just wanted to teach him how providing a source work and I really need a break here to refresh myself. I haven’t been the best here lately. I don’t want to cause more issues here. I take a break here for the time being. Sorry for any damage A.R.M. 03:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, L235. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
links-in-logs
I fixed User:Enterprisey/links-in-logs.js to work for sysops too, and added some CSS fixes as well. You may want to redirect or something, although What Links Here doesn't show any backlinks so I don't think it's that important. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Enterprisey: You're the best! Thanks!! <3 Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Administrators' newsletter – December 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).
Administrator changes
Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz
Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
- A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
- A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.
Technical news
- Administrators and bureaucrats can no longer unblock themselves unless they placed the block initially. This change has been implemented globally. See also this ongoing village pump discussion (permalink).
- To complement the aforementioned change, blocked administrators will soon have the ability to block the administrator that placed their block to mitigate the possibility of a compromised administrator account blocking all other active administrators.
- Since deployment of Partial blocks on Test Wikipedia, several bugs were identified. Most of them are now fixed. Administrators are encouraged to test the new deployment and report new bugs on Phabricator or leave feedback on the Project's talk page. You can request administrator access on the Test Wiki here.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 3 December 2018. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
- Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.
Obituaries
- Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (Raymond Arritt) passed away on 14 November 2018. Boris joined Wikipedia as Raymond arritt on 8 May 2006 and was an administrator from 30 July 2007 to 2 June 2008.
Peace Dove Christmas
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
Wikipedia Day 2019
There's discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota of a celebration in the Twin Cities on January 19. It would be great if that fits your schedule. Jonathunder (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jonathunder: I'm sorry, I'll be out of town then – I'll actually be hosting a Wikipedia Day event where I'm at, though! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Getting back to you, and hoping you can help
Kevin,
On or about Nov 10, I wrote a note to Oshwah on his talk page, to which you responded.
At the time, I was upset about being triple-banned for edits I made that I thought belonged. The ubiquitous NorthBySouthBaranof explained to me where my edits were inappropriate, and you chimed in as well, although without his imperious tone.
Indeed, I made mistakes, although I would maintain that mistakes should not be a cause for a ban. The mistakes in my edits were legitimate errors - they were not intentional vandalism.
It's been about 38 days since my 30 day ban.
I went back to the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez page, and added that which I intended to add last time, except I was more careful this time around.
My edit remained for a whopping 15 minutes.
An editor with the handle "Tsumikiria", the same person who attacked me 38 or so days ago and referred me for banning, reverted all my edits there, for which his basis was not just false, they were and are, I dare say, anti-Semitic.
I added content which was sources by three provided links: 1. CBS News 2. The Times of Israel 3. The Jerusalem Post "Tsumikiria" not only reverted my edits, he sent me a message accusing me of "disruptive editing", of making "defamatory" claims, and threatened another block.
And here is his reasoning, I kid you not:
"we know Israeli media criticize anyone criticizing israel (sic)"
Um, CBS is not Israeli media. The other two organs are respected, centrist publications, one of which (Times of Israel) has an Arab language publication. (See Wikipedia's respective articles on each publication.)
Furthermore, the Israeli media articles linked contain quotes from named Americans, both on the right and on the left. Even if Tsumikiria's false accusation were true, it would be irrelevant.
Can you please go to the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez page and see for yourself? I am just an editor, same level as Tsumikiria, albeit I'm the one with lousy computer skills. Can you please jump in on behalf of truth, justice, and the American way? Or, failing that, for a fair and open Wikipedia?
Merry Merry
|
Happy Christmas! | |
| Hello L235, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 02:08, 19 December 2018 (UTC) |
Happy holidays!
|
|
|
Happy Holidays! |
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Merry Christmas and happy 2019
Merry Christmas and happy new year! I was happy to see you have a successful RfA during 2018. I hope you will edit more happily in 2019 Hhkohh (talk) 12:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
_(14586469407).jpg)
Liz Read! Talk! is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Section break
Not a violation of a stupid restriction [4] How about answering the question instead of removing my question and threatening me. Legacypac (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Legacypac, I have not followed this case at all (in fact, I didn't even know it existed until I saw the post on your talk page) but you really need to back off. It's gotten to the point where even someone without a clue about the case is starting to wonder what the heck you're doing. Primefac (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Happy New Year, L235!
L235,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There are a number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6:
- G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
- R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
- G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.
- The Wikimedia Foundation now requires all interface administrators to enable two-factor authentication.
- Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.
Technical news
- Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
- At least 8 characters in length
- Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
- Different from their username
- User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
- Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
- {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.
Arbitration
- Following the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: AGK, Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, Mkdw, SilkTork.
Miscellaneous
- Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
- Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
2019
 |
Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
You are cordially invited to Stanford University to celebrate Wikipedia's birthday
- I am delighted to invite you to the 2019 Wikipedia Day party at Stanford, which will be held on Tuesday, January 15, 2019, at 5:00-8:30pm.
- There will be pizza, cake, and refreshments; both newcomers and experienced Wikimedians are welcome! We will have a beginner track with tutorials, and an advanced track with presentations, lightning talks, and tips and tricks. Admission is free, and you do NOT have to be a Stanford University student to attend.
See you soon! All the best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c)
Your GA nomination of Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College
The article Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
You missed a rangeblock from October?
Here, you claim to have rangeblocked the IPs for the 45.116.0.0/16 range, but that didn't happen. Maybe you were too busy and missed it? ([5], [6]) This range is still making sock edits and vandalistic edits along with disruptive editing, such as unsourced additions. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 22:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @R9tgokunks: I'm not totally sure what I was doing in Oct but I'm afraid I don't have the time at the moment to look into this further – it's a really busy time for me. Large/long rangeblocks normally require a CU consult. SPI or another admin is probably the best next step. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Beta cluster
Hey. I made an account, but I messed up a bit. Can you please:
- Rename "DannyS712 tes" to "DannyS712 test" (forgot the t)
- Grant me (DannyS712) admin and iadmin (and importer? so that I can import the script... idk)
thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- I got the rights, but can you rename my test account? --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: It seems to have hung: [7]. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Should I just wait? Or is it okay if I make a new test account on beta, and just ignore the tes one... sorry, I'm just really picky for consistency like that --DannyS712 (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Yeah, please feel free to create another test account. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Then can you cancel the rename? It won't let me create the account because "Username entered already in use" --DannyS712 (talk) 21:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Or can you give be beaurocrat for a day to mess with just my account and try to figure it out? If not, thats totally fine --DannyS712 (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Bureaucrats can no longer rename users. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Then whatever user group it is... like how are you renaming me? --DannyS712 (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- The ability to make local renames was entirely disabled. Is it fine to use another account? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: I would, but for some reason it hasn't sent me any email confirming my main account, and I don't want to just create another account if I have no way to recover it. I suggest removing my rights until the beta cluster finally emails me, to mitigate any risk of my account being compromised (and yes, I used a password I had never used before, but still) --DannyS712 (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- The ability to make local renames was entirely disabled. Is it fine to use another account? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Then whatever user group it is... like how are you renaming me? --DannyS712 (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Bureaucrats can no longer rename users. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Yeah, please feel free to create another test account. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Should I just wait? Or is it okay if I make a new test account on beta, and just ignore the tes one... sorry, I'm just really picky for consistency like that --DannyS712 (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: It seems to have hung: [7]. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Bengal cat/Temp
I created a temporary "bengal cat" page which I was editing for copyright violations. I woke this morning top find it gone. Please advise. (Lubbad85 (talk) 14:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC))
I am having some difficulty in sorting the issues. My goal is to get the Bengal Cat page up and make it encyclopedic. I have done extensive edits, and apparently over-quoted material for the article. The latest example you have alerted me to is the (cfa.org/breeds/breedsab/bengal.aspx reference). In that instance I can erase the offending reference. I do hope to leave one reference to the relevant CFA "Breed Standard" in the infobox. Is there an area where a temp Bengal Cat page can exist. Thank you (Lubbad85 (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC))
I will create the "Bengal cat/Temp" page and try to go section by section to create a new article using the previous versions as a guide. I hope that this is an appropriate use of the page. Please alert me if this is not procedure. All my best (Lubbad85 (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC))
- Hi Lubbad85, thanks for your work on this. The best thing to do is to wait for a copyright expert at CP to clean and stubify the article, and then work on it there. It seems that much of the article has long contained copyright violations, so writing a clean version based on the current article leaves you easily liable for copyright infringement, as happened here. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
Administrators' newsletter – February 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
- Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
- A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.
Technical news
- A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
Hello! I stumbled across the standing review offer on your user page and was wondering if you might be interested in taking a look at Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton. It's a Minnesota Supreme Court case, but I submitted it for peer review over a month ago and have yet to receive a reply. If the article isn't of interest to you or you don't have time at the moment, don't worry about it. In any case, I'm in no hurry. Thanks for your time! ebbillings (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ebbillings: Sure, it's on my to-do list – it might be a bit before I get to it though Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 05:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey
Hi. How are you doing? Hope all is well and fine. I just gave Kb03 NPR on permanent terms. If that's not alright with you (as I noticed you had given NPR on a temporary basis), feel free to revert my right addition. Thanks, Lourdes 04:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Discussion at User talk:DannyS712 test/chance.js
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:DannyS712 test/chance.js. DannyS712 (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Eastern Europe and Balkans
It looks like you forgot to finish archiving the Eastern Europe and Balkans clarification request --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 05:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Guerillero: Are you referring to this and this or something else? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- It is still at ARCA --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 07:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ah. Due to a procedural change in the past few months, we keep it, hatted, on the ARCA for about 24 hours after closure. See the procedures. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- It is still at ARCA --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 07:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Archiving at WT:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard
Diff: [8]
My apologies. I get a little archive happy sometimes. My problem is that it doesn't seem to work all the time (as in I don't see "|Archive"), so I get a little too excited when I see it pop up. I won't make that mistake again! Thank you! :D ―MattLongCT -Talk-☖ 20:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Hello
Hello Kevin! I am a grad student working under Angela. We are hosting another edit-a-thon on March 8th for Women and LGBT+ Diversity on Wikipedia. Here's our Outreach Dashboard: [9]. We also have one on April 19th for diversity, the Outreach Dashboard: [10]. I will share the meet up page with you soon once it is completed! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madsekad (talk • contribs) 17:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The RfC on administrator activity requirements failed to reach consensus for any proposal.
- Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.
Technical news
- A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
- paid-en-wp
wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing. - checkuser-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.
- paid-en-wp
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2019 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Base, Einsbor, Jon Kolbert, Schniggendiller, and Wim b.
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
Hi, would sure connect soon. Cheers!
Eyitayo Alimi (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thats a nice kitten you got there. can i pat Elitematterman (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Archive_252
Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Archive_252 uh looks like the content you re-added was actually spam. note Special:Contributions/Editwithcare Hydromania (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red April Events
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur37
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
Ban of user:ItchyJunk
Hello, I observed your recent block of User:Itchyjunk and I believe it was a hasty ban that was unnecessary. the user came to IRC looking for assistance which was rendered. We discussed a citation that needed fixing and the user acted boldly and tried to assist. If the username is offensive, then I highly suggest helping the user with a username change (Like User:ItchyJ or something) rather than handing out a block. Please remember that We should not bite newcomers, some of whom might need a little guidance. The Pony Toast 🍞 (Talk) 20:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- @The Pony Toast: I think you're correct that the NOTHERE aspect of the block can no longer be sustained based on the user's attempts to engage. Once I saw the user was on IRC, I left a link to Special:GlobalRenameRequest and noted that would be the way forward. Any admin is welcome to lift the block once the username aspect is dealt with. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 01:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- @PonyToast: fix ping ^ Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 01:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
|
|
|
Technical news
- In Special:Preferences under "Appearance" → "Advanced options", there is now an option to show a confirmation prompt when clicking on a rollback link.
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee clarified that the General 1RR prohibition for Palestine-Israel articles may only be enforced on pages with the {{ARBPIA 1RR editnotice}} edit notice.
Miscellaneous
- Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
- As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Thank you for what you're doing to protect the Notre-Dame de Paris page. ThomasBur (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC) |
ARBPIA edit notice
Hi, I've found that even some experienced editors are confused by Template:ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice and its documentation. It is hard work to wade through Wikipedia:ARBPIA3 to sort out the decisions from the argument. Can I suggest that the notice instead links to the summary at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles? That way, people who just want to see what the current restrictions are (i.e., most editors) will see them immediately. Also, the documentation looks out of date. It refers to the ARBPIA restriction, but there are several. Then it says "Note that a lack of this template is not an indication that the article is not subject to the restriction", but arbcom has retracted that in the case of the General 1RR restriction. Thanks. Zerotalk 04:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Zero0000: Thanks for the note! I've updated the documentation. WP:A/I/PIA is already linked to in the text of the notice, but I agree that it's awfully hard to find. How would you suggest changing it? Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 05:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Since WP:ARBPIA3 is linked in the fine print at the end of the notice, I suggest that the sentence "This is due to an arbitration decision, and in accordance with the most recent active arbitration case remedies, which authorised discretionary sanctions for edits and pages relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict." be simplified to "This is due to arbitration decisions which authorised discretionary sanctions for edits and pages relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict." with the same links as now. Cheers. Zerotalk 07:27, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Congrats
- Just wanted to say congratulations on your successful RfA. You've come a long way since you expressed never wanting that specific hat. Heh.
- I'm glad you're one of the first people I got to know really well on here, Kevin. You've been a constant help and a true friend, truth be told. Thanks for everything you've done.
- And knowing your work thus far, just as a regular editor and also as a clerk, I know you're up to the task. As I said before, you were always a help to me.
- And like I stated (way back when), when I once encouraged you to run for admin, you're well-suited to the task. You're patient, and know policy through and through.
- Feel free to get in touch, Kev. :)
Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 22:52, 21 April 2019 (UTC) (Quinto Simmaco)
- @Symmachus Auxiliarus: Thanks for your note, Symmachus! It's always good to hear from you! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 01:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment concluded that creating pages in the portal namespace should be restricted to autoconfirmed users.
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
Technical news
- XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.
Arbitration
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions
; administrators found failing to have adequately done sowill not be resysopped automatically
. All current administrators have been notified of this change. - Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment is currently open to amend the community sanctions procedure to exclude non XfD or CSD deletions.
- A proposal to remove pre-2009 indefinite IP blocks is currently open for discussion.
This user
Sk8erPrince I don't know what to do about this situation. He keeps holding a grudge against me. I really want to make up with him. I admit that I made very very rude comments previously but now I apologize. Sincerely, Masum Reza☎ 17:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Masumrezarock100: Sorry I didn't respond until now. As I see has been mentioned on your talk page, sometimes you're going to have problems with other users. Everyone does. The best thing to do is to walk away and not try to force additional interaction, which can be seen as harassment by the other user and as disruption by the community. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
Administrator changes
- Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
- An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
- An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.
Technical news
- The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
- Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
Miscellaneous
- The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
- The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.
it's a long time later so I'm not sure if it matters
ACC tool access request approved
Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data and approved your request.
You may now access the interface here. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarize yourself with the process.
Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.
Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me or any other tool admin if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
Administrators' newsletter – July 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
Administrator changes
- 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
- 1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
- 2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
- In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
- The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
- The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
- A request for comment seeks to determine whether Wikipedia:Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.
Technical news
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.
Miscellaneous
- In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop Fram. This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.