Kanthi78

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Your recent editing history at Ciprofloxacin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Scray (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Scray (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Two accounts?

Do you have two editing accounts? I wonder if you understand there is no need to have two accounts, such as this one and Keerthi78. If I'm confused, please accept my apologies. If both of these accounts are yours, you may also want to read about sock puppets. -- Scray (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

References

Secondary sources such as review articles are required per WP:MEDRS. Note that these are NOT the same as peer reviewed source. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Ciprofloxacin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Any reviewing admins should also take a look at:

• Keerthi78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• 76.177.28.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).

These three accounts may all be the same editor. EdJohnston (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Continuing concerns about references

I have reverted your edits at Ciprofloxacin, and urge you to use the Talk page here or there to discuss edits and work with us to reach consensus. It's clear that you are a knowledgeable editor, but we have guidance for references to be used in a medical context. -- Scray (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

Since you've continued to re-add similar material at Ciprofloxacin while making no effort to engage in discussion, and continued to use multiple accounts (IPs and registered accounts), you've been indefinitely blocked. You may be unblocked if you agree to follow Wikipedia policy. See WP:GAB for how to appeal your block. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2012 (UTC)