Welcome! edit

Hello, Jurita Kalite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Jurita Kalite, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jurita Kalite edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Jurita Kalite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

To: Лушников Владимир Александрович

I created this page and I disagree with the given reason for deletion. Message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted - this is statement of artist Jurita Kalite. All information and photos inder Jurita Kalite copyright and trade mark intellectual property. No any person can not edited this information without agree the artist Jurita Kalite.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jurita Kalite edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Jurita Kalite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jurita Kalite (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Jurita Kalite responce:

Please check the photos I was added to my page. I would like to be sure everything ok with this photos and copyright. This my own photos. I am artist Jurita Kalite and owner of this page and owner of Lady Ju Gallery and website www.ladyjugallery. Please confirm - everything ok with this photos and i can keep this photos on my page in WIKI as my portret in my enciclopedy page. Thank you ( Jurita Kalite (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC) )Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because:

I created this page and I disagree with the given reason for deletion. Message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted - this is statement of artist Jurita Kalite. All information and photos inder Jurita Kalite copyright and trade mark intellectual property. No any person can not edited this information without agree the artist Jurita Kalite. The page not appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. I do not use Wikipeadia as free web hosting service. I have my own website www.ladyjugallery.co.uk I think this page should not be deleted for this reason. I will go to contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion".

Again removed my photo from the page. WHAT'S WRONG??? edit

Tired of asking in English. I will ask in Russian - what is wrong again? that you deleted my photo again? what am I violence there? Photos are no different from photos on other encyclopedic pages of other people. What don't you like in me? Well, it is already becoming unbearable! I have to prove that this is my page and my site and my gallery and my works. so what is happening!


Wiki site accuses me of violating my own copyright! I am told the second day that I myself illegally took photos from myself and my own website ladyjugallery.co.uk and put them on the Wiki website here! This is complete nonsense! Ladyjugallery.co.uk is my own website and under my copyright and my licenses protection are everywhere! And I, as owner of the website and gallery, can give permission who can take my own content from my own website. Do I need to issue any certificate signed bt me as Artist Jurita Kalite for Wiki Page artist Jurita Kalite? if yes - please give me template text and I will issue this for you after minute. I need to ask permission from myself - can I take photos from my own site and put it on my own page here?


Снова убрал мое фото со страницы. В ЧЕМ ДЕЛО???

Надоело спрашивать на английском. Спрошу по-русски - что опять не так? что вы снова удалили мою фотографию? что я там за насилие? Фотографии ничем не отличаются от фотографий на других энциклопедических страницах других людей. Что тебе не нравится во мне? Ну, это уже становится невыносимым! Я должен доказать, что это моя страница, мой сайт, моя галерея и мои работы. так что происходит!


Вики-сайт обвиняет меня в нарушении моих авторских прав! На второй день мне сказали, что я сам незаконно взял фотографии с себя и со своего собственного сайта ladyjugallery.co.uk и разместил их на вики-сайте здесь! Это полная чушь! Ladyjugallery.co.uk - мой собственный веб-сайт, и под моим авторским правом и моей лицензией защита везде! И я, как владелец сайта и галереи, могу дать разрешение, кто может брать мой собственный контент с моего собственного сайта. Нужно ли мне выдавать какой-либо сертификат, подписанный мной как Художником Юритой Калитэ для художника вики-страницы Юриты Калите? если да - пожалуйста, дайте мне текст шаблона, и я опубликую его для вас через минуту. Мне нужно спросить у меня разрешение - могу ли я сделать фотографии со своего сайта и разместить их здесь на своей странице?

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC))Reply
It sounds like you are confused about the issue. You stated "Wiki site accuses me of violating my own copyright!" However, this is not what the Speedy Deletion tag is implying. I am not sure what the photo is of or is depicting (nor does it really matter to me), however the tag is implying that it is not consistent with Wiki's goals. Also you have stated that you own the page, which is not correct. You may own the copyrights to that photo, but not any wiki page (including your own user page). If anyone owns a wiki page it would be Wikipedia itself, but really its "Wikipedia is a multilingual, web-based, free-content encyclopedia" Which all means that anyone and everyone can edit any page so long as they follow wiki policies and procedures. This also means using or deleting any photo's on wiki in Wikipedia. You still would own copyrights to the photo, but so would Wikipedia once posted on it for use within Wikipedia. Hope this helps you, just ran across this page and thought I would offer some advice. Kevin "Hawk" Fisher (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


You have incomprehensibly written points on how to create a page. For my every action you write that I break your rules. Yesterday I put the warning "do not delete the page. I need a few weeks to create it." nevertheless, you still deleted it. In this regard, my questions are: 1) this acrobat was created for my page to record my biography in the encyclopedia. My assistants work through these passwords and emails and operate with all websites and social networks. My question is: for your Wikipedia, we can not use already worked passwords and addresses? My assistant has to create a separate account and, already from that account, create a page of my biography with new mails? It is right? Please do not send me on your links - I have been reading your links for a year and do not understand anything about what is written there. Maybe for young people you write clear text. For me, this is completely incomprehensible. Yesterday I was told that I should get permission to share. I received. put on the page. nevertheless, you still deleted my photo, even with permission from your comm. As soon as I write any word on the page - you immediately accuse me of copyright infringement. whose rights? I violate these rights when I write a sentence: Yurita Kalita year of birth 1966 - in which word do I violate someone's copyright? Yesterday you said that I have no right to write a page about myself. Must write someone else. Good. My assistant will write a page for me. as well as it serves my own website. What is the copyright violation and whose rights do I violate?

I ask all these questions in order to understand what steps I must take in order to finally have a page with my biography as an artist. I do not understand anything in your rules. There are so many of them and they are so intricately written. Maybe you have a paid service and I can pay for one of you to create this page for me? because I'm tired of spending so much time on you. I do not have time to read your message, as you already delete the page. I understand that I can never create this page. My assistant is also unlikely to cope with you. Therefore, I need a person from you who will do this work. I ask you to give me such a person.

Перевод на русский жалобы:

у вас непонятно написаны пункты как можно создать страницу. На каждое мое действие вы пишите что я нарушаю ваши правила. Вчера я поставила предупреждение "не удаляйте страницу. мне нужно несколько недель чтобы ее создать". тем не менее вы все равно ее удалили. в связи с этим мои вопросы: 1) этот акаует создан для моей страницы для записи моей биографии в энциклопедии. Через эти пароли и майлы работают мои ассистенты и оперируют со всеми вэбсайтами и социальными сетями. Мой вопрос: для вашей википедии мы не можем использовать уже отработанные пароли и адреса? Мой асистент должен создать отдельный акацнт и уже с того акацнта, под новыми майлами создать страницу моей биографии? Это правильно? Пожалуйста не отсылайте меня по вашим линкам - я год уже читаю ваши линки и ничего не понимаю что у вас там написано. Может быть для молодых люей вы пишите понятный текст. Для меня это совершенно непонятно. Вчера мне сказали что я должна получить разрешение коммон. Я получила. выставила на страницу. тем не менее вы все равно удалили мою фотографию, даже при наличии разрешения от вашего коммона. Как только я пишу любое слово на страницу - вы тут же обвиняете меня в нарушении авторских прав. чьих прав? сьи права я нарушаю когда пишу предложение: Юрита Калите год рождения 1966 - в каком слове тут я нарушаю чьи то авторские права? Вчера вы сказали ято я не имею права писать про себя страницу. Должен написать кто то другой. Хорошо. Мой ассистент будет писать для меня страницу. так же как и он обслуживает мой собственный сайт. В чем тут нарушение авторских прав и чьи права я нарушаю?

Я спрашиваю все эти вопросы, чтобы понимать - какие шаги я должна сделать чтобы наконец, появилась страница с моей биографией как артиста. Я ничего не понимаю в ваших правилах. их так много и они так запутанно написаны. может быть у вас есть платный сервис и я могу заплатить чтобы кто то из вас создал эту страницу для меня? потому что я устала тратить на вас столько времени. Я не успеваю прочитать ваш месседж, как вы уже удаляете страницу. Я так понимаю что я никогда не смогу создать эту страницу. Мой ассистент тоже врядли справиться с вами. Поэтому мне нужен человек от вас, кто сделает эту работу. Прошу вас предоставить мне такого человека.

(Jurita Kalite (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply


What link being able to present notability references that are consistent with Wikipedia's policies??? I have just my own link which is www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. on my personal page i can not present gallery of my work. How i can explain to readers - where they can to see my work? You tell me what Wikipedia rules tell, I can not create page for myself. ok. I will ask my assistant to do this. Now you tell me "do not share your account with your assistant as that would violate our rules about no shared accounts". Are joked? why you tell me - "shared account"& "shared account for what? This account was been created for create my page. In all my page or account or website working my assistant. What is the problem?

What link being able to present notability references that are consistent with Wikipedia's policies??? I have just my own link which is www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. on my personal page i can not present gallery of my work. How i can explain to readers - where they can to see my work?

Вы говорите мне, что говорят правила Википедии, я не могу создать страницу для себя. Хорошо. Я попрошу моего помощника сделать это. Теперь вы говорите мне «не делитесь своей учетной записью с помощником, поскольку это нарушит наши правила об отсутствии общих учетных записей». Шутили? почему вы говорите мне - "общая учетная запись" и "общая учетная запись для чего? Этот аккаунт был создан для создания моей страницы. На всей моей страничке или аккаунте или на сайте работает мой помощник. В чем проблема?

Какая ссылка способна представить заметные ссылки, которые согласуются с политикой Википедии ??? У меня есть только моя собственная ссылка www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. На моей личной странице я не могу представить галерею своих работ. Как я могу объяснить читателям - где они могут увидеть мои работы?

(Jurita Kalite (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

YES - I am confused about the issue. I do not know what i need to do under your wiki rules. My assistant he try to understand your rules - as well - we can not understand - how we can create my page. About photos - this is my portrait with my face. same photos as million users add in to their biography page. My assistant would like to create this my page, but he is confused about this issue too.


we are stumped by the behavior of your volunteers on this website. I need wiki volunteer who will create this page Jurita Kalite for me. Can you do it? Do you have such a service? Give me instructions please. It is terrible and unbearable to spend so much time on correspondence with your site, proving every time that the photo is my own portrait and these are my own photos under my own copyright. We don’t want to do anything with you website after such violence.

мы в тупике от поведения ваших волонтеров. Мне нужен волонтер ваш кто создаст эту страницу для меня. Вы можете это сделать? У вас есть такой сервис? Дайте мне инструкции пожалуйста. Это невыносимо тратить столько времени на переписку с вашим сайтом, доказывая каждый раз что на фото мой собственный портрет и это мои фотографии. С вами уже ничего не хочется делать после такого насилия с вашей стороны.

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

How can I put a photo on the page? edit

How can I put a photo on the page? I have read terms and condition. I have read photos rules. I think I did everythink correct. I can not understand - where is mistake? your site does not allow insert photos - it says that there is already such a photo. so how do i find and add it photos?

I can not continue create my page until i will add my own photos as page owner correct.

Any help welcomed.

there is a Common permission

Permissions - Wikimedia Commons Ticket#2019011210002492] Confirmation of receipt

from: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> to: Ju Ka <jurita.kalite@googlemail.com> date: 12 Jan 2019, 10:42 subject: [Ticket#2019011210002492] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Permissions - Wikime [...]) mailed-by: wikimedia.org Signed by: wikimedia.org

(Jurita Kalite (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jurita Kalite edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Jurita Kalite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 14:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Do not attempt to create this page again without being able to present notability references that are consistent with Wikipedia's policies. Also, do not share your account with your assistant as that would violate our rules about no shared accounts. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 15:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


You have incomprehensibly written points on how to create a page. For my every action you write that I break your rules. Yesterday I put the warning "do not delete the page. I need a few weeks to create it." nevertheless, you still deleted it. In this regard, my questions are: 1) this acrobat was created for my page to record my biography in the encyclopedia. My assistants work through these passwords and emails and operate with all websites and social networks. My question is: for your Wikipedia, we can not use already worked passwords and addresses? My assistant has to create a separate account and, already from that account, create a page of my biography with new mails? It is right? Please do not send me on your links - I have been reading your links for a year and do not understand anything about what is written there. Maybe for young people you write clear text. For me, this is completely incomprehensible. Yesterday I was told that I should get permission to share. I received. put on the page. nevertheless, you still deleted my photo, even with permission from your comm. As soon as I write any word on the page - you immediately accuse me of copyright infringement. whose rights? I violate these rights when I write a sentence: Yurita Kalita year of birth 1966 - in which word do I violate someone's copyright? Yesterday you said that I have no right to write a page about myself. Must write someone else. Good. My assistant will write a page for me. as well as it serves my own website. What is the copyright violation and whose rights do I violate?

I ask all these questions in order to understand what steps I must take in order to finally have a page with my biography as an artist. I do not understand anything in your rules. There are so many of them and they are so intricately written. Maybe you have a paid service and I can pay for one of you to create this page for me? because I'm tired of spending so much time on you. I do not have time to read your message, as you already delete the page. I understand that I can never create this page. My assistant is also unlikely to cope with you. Therefore, I need a person from you who will do this work. I ask you to give me such a person.

Перевод на русский жалобы:

у вас непонятно написаны пункты как можно создать страницу. На каждое мое действие вы пишите что я нарушаю ваши правила. Вчера я поставила предупреждение "не удаляйте страницу. мне нужно несколько недель чтобы ее создать". тем не менее вы все равно ее удалили. в связи с этим мои вопросы: 1) этот акаует создан для моей страницы для записи моей биографии в энциклопедии. Через эти пароли и майлы работают мои ассистенты и оперируют со всеми вэбсайтами и социальными сетями. Мой вопрос: для вашей википедии мы не можем использовать уже отработанные пароли и адреса? Мой асистент должен создать отдельный акацнт и уже с того акацнта, под новыми майлами создать страницу моей биографии? Это правильно? Пожалуйста не отсылайте меня по вашим линкам - я год уже читаю ваши линки и ничего не понимаю что у вас там написано. Может быть для молодых люей вы пишите понятный текст. Для меня это совершенно непонятно. Вчера мне сказали что я должна получить разрешение коммон. Я получила. выставила на страницу. тем не менее вы все равно удалили мою фотографию, даже при наличии разрешения от вашего коммона. Как только я пишу любое слово на страницу - вы тут же обвиняете меня в нарушении авторских прав. чьих прав? сьи права я нарушаю когда пишу предложение: Юрита Калите год рождения 1966 - в каком слове тут я нарушаю чьи то авторские права? Вчера вы сказали ято я не имею права писать про себя страницу. Должен написать кто то другой. Хорошо. Мой ассистент будет писать для меня страницу. так же как и он обслуживает мой собственный сайт. В чем тут нарушение авторских прав и чьи права я нарушаю?

Я спрашиваю все эти вопросы, чтобы понимать - какие шаги я должна сделать чтобы наконец, появилась страница с моей биографией как артиста. Я ничего не понимаю в ваших правилах. их так много и они так запутанно написаны. может быть у вас есть платный сервис и я могу заплатить чтобы кто то из вас создал эту страницу для меня? потому что я устала тратить на вас столько времени. Я не успеваю прочитать ваш месседж, как вы уже удаляете страницу. Я так понимаю что я никогда не смогу создать эту страницу. Мой ассистент тоже врядли справиться с вами. Поэтому мне нужен человек от вас, кто сделает эту работу. Прошу вас предоставить мне такого человека.

(Jurita Kalite (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply


What link being able to present notability references that are consistent with Wikipedia's policies??? I have just my own link which is www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. on my personal page i can not present gallery of my work. How i can explain to readers - where they can to see my work? You tell me what Wikipedia rules tell, I can not create page for myself. ok. I will ask my assistant to do this. Now you tell me "do not share your account with your assistant as that would violate our rules about no shared accounts". Are joked? why you tell me - "shared account"& "shared account for what? This account was been created for create my page. In all my page or account or website working my assistant. What is the problem?

What link being able to present notability references that are consistent with Wikipedia's policies??? I have just my own link which is www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. on my personal page i can not present gallery of my work. How i can explain to readers - where they can to see my work?

Вы говорите мне, что говорят правила Википедии, я не могу создать страницу для себя. Хорошо. Я попрошу моего помощника сделать это. Теперь вы говорите мне «не делитесь своей учетной записью с помощником, поскольку это нарушит наши правила об отсутствии общих учетных записей». Шутили? почему вы говорите мне - "общая учетная запись" и "общая учетная запись для чего? Этот аккаунт был создан для создания моей страницы. На всей моей страничке или аккаунте или на сайте работает мой помощник. В чем проблема?

Какая ссылка способна представить заметные ссылки, которые согласуются с политикой Википедии ??? У меня есть только моя собственная ссылка www.ladyjugallery.co.uk. На моей личной странице я не могу представить галерею своих работ. Как я могу объяснить читателям - где они могут увидеть мои работы?

(Jurita Kalite (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

Wiki volunteer needed for create this page Jurita Kalite under Wiki Rules edit

we are stumped by the behavior of your volunteers on this website. I need wiki volunteer who will create this page Jurita Kalite for me. Can you do it? Do you have such a service? Give me instructions please. It is terrible and unbearable to spend so much time on correspondence with your site, proving every time that the photo is my own portrait and these are my own photos under my own copyright.

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

Starting off on the wrong foot edit

I'm sorry that you appear to have stumbled in trying to add content to Wikipedia. Sometimes, when people hear that it's "an encyclopedia that anyone can edit", they translate that in their head to something like "I can add any content I want to". This latter interpretation is not correct.

First off, Wikipedia includes articles about notable subjects. For Wikipedia, this word means something more specific than the ordinary English usage of the word. For us, a subject is notable if there are multiple independently published reports about it with in-depth coverage, published by outfits with reputation for editorial control and fact checking. The requirement for independence is one of the reasons we so strongly discourage the creation of articles by editors with a conflict of interest. It is not a social media site where you can write whatever you choose about yourself and control the content of the "your" page.

So, to have an article about you, about your gallery, or about your violin, we need to see references to independent published sources that establish notability in this somewhat idiosyncratic Wikipedia fashion. That's one of the first considerations a reviewer makes about a draft and one of the biggest hurdles for new editors trying to create new articles.

There are tools for creating and formatting text and properly citing references, so the coding skills needed are not very onerous. There are generally volunteers who are willing to fix these things if given a reasonable starting point. What we don't find as commonly are volunteers willing to find the notability and other references needed to get someone else's article started.

The requirement of "no shared accounts" is bound up in the need for accountability for edits. Every contribution to Wikipedia is recorded in a page's history and attributed to a specific contributor by way of either an IP address or a named account. A shared account violates this principle and will be blocked from contributing.

I don't know if this additional explanation will help you understand the barriers you've been running into. It may be hard to accept that we are telling you, so far, your contributions have not demonstrated your subjects meet our notability requirements. We recognize that someone can be successful, important, even famous, yet not have the sort of coverage needed to meet our notability standards. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 20:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear — jmcgnh, Very thank you for the detailed enplane to me about your work. Yesterday (first time for 8 years) one of volunteer as well detailed and correct explain to me about your site. Thank you very much. I beginning understand what "user page" its not page what i need and I try to create 8 years (eight years!!!).

Now I understand why you did delete all context from page "User:Jurita Kalite" - because this page not for artist biography and I must follow to open space Wikipedia (where is it space???).

MY PHOTOS - I can not understand only why you violence my copyright for my own photos-portrait of me and my dog in my own flat??? As you can see on my website I have not "free license". All this photos is archive of my family and can be published only by member of my family or me in person. I am owner of copyright for all photos which show my person or any members of my family. I am sorry, but if you do not return my photos to me I will compensation claim for violence of my copyright, Sorry for that. I can see, how you are working with this "violence copyright" and I will follow same way as you.

Yes I do understand - Wikipedia includes articles about notable subjects. Yes, I am British artist and work with celebrities. i must have biography page as live person.

This subject is notable and there are multiple independently published reports about me it with in-depth coverage, published by outfits with reputation for editorial control and fact checking.

Sorry, I do not understand what is it "the creation of articles by editors with a conflict of interest".

STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN - this is violin legally registered in official copyright and trade mark offices in UK and around the world. As other violin, this STRADIVARY-JARIK VIOLIN must be published in your website. This information not for a social media site. This information for encyclopedia about collectable violin STRADIVARI-JARIK which beginning to be as rarity and collectable violin.

I am artist, collectors and founder and CEO of gallery which is as private gallery collection of my family. Not just for me.

The gallery was founded in 2016 and now I try provide information about this and about violin (which is part of collection of our family) copyright certificate and Trade mark certificate of STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN. I hope you will accept official trade mark certificate about this violin name. Intellectual property office UK did confirm name of this violin and issue official Registration Certificate. Your encyclopedia shut be accept this as well and publish article STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN. The reason my call to you - I can see few page about Stradivari violin or Stradivari family on your website and I think the STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN must be added in this list of Stradivari violin as part of items.

I try to found article and try to create article STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN with used your tools for creating and formatting text. At the moment I try to found options "references" in your tools.

If any volunteers who are willing to fix these things if given a reasonable starting point and help me - its will be great. And I need this help.

Sorry do not understand this message from you: "What we don't find as commonly are volunteers willing to find the notability and other references needed to get someone else's article started." - I so understand you are not accept the Intellectual Property office Registration Certificate for the real fact of this violin? - its correct?

What is it "shared accounts"? Its looking similar as join bank account or what it is in your website? Every contribution to Wikipedia in my page is recorded in a page's history and attributed to a specific contributor by way of either an IP address or a named account - yes I do understand and no problem at all.

Can not understand, why my assistant can not work in my account with my page on my behalf same as one of your volunteer??? What is the problem? I think you understand, a lot important person have their assistant who working as media assistand special for: creat page or websites for the under their behalf. I am sorry, I am artist and i can not spend a lot hours for work on your website. I need to do my job. Why I can not have assistant for create page on your website???

I try to understand how you are work. Your website is very difficult. Me and my assistant, we can not understand how you are working. We try to follow your rules, abut some of yours volunteers is very rude and do not help at all. We are not programmer and for us very difficult understand your tools, but we try to do this.

Unfortunately, you make "violence copyright" and "page delete" so fast, what we have no time to understand where is mistake and resolve the problem. Its terrible work some of your volunteers. You need understand - not all of user would like to be used wiki account for any spam or violence or work with you in future as yours volunteers. In my plan to create biography page and page for very important collection items.

Now i need understand how i can provide to you registration certificate as you accept its.

Yes you are right, your explain be hard to accept that you are telling me, so far, I try understand what contributions need have demonstrated my subjects meet your notability requirements. Thank you for understanding that someone can be successful, important, even famous.

So, can you or someone help me with create article about STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN? I will waiting when someone of your volunteer contact with me for help for this.

Because Its will be hard for me create article under your rules after last two days one of your volunteers attack me. I was take medicine tablets last two day and cry after discuss with him.

I will no longer create pages or articles myself, since you still delete everything. I spent a week of time on you, as a result I have nothing, my nerves are spoiled, and I didn’t complete my main work this week, as I tried to correspond with your volunteers for days. As you understand, it is impossible to continue. I must to do my job. But I will seek the publication of my biography and articles about collectable things here on your site. If some of your volunteers don’t appreciate my time and are rude to me, I will write directly to your head office and I’m sure that they will accept my complaint and publish my articles.

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 8:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC))

YES I NEED HELP FROM VOLUNTEERS FOR CREATE PAGE edit

Dear — jmcgnh, Very thank you for the detailed enplane to me about your work. Yesterday (first time for 8 years) one of volunteer as well detailed and correct explain to me about your site. Thank you very much. I beginning understand what "user page" its not page what i need and I try to create 8 years (eight years!!!).

Now I understand why you did delete all context from page "User:Jurita Kalite" - because this page not for artist biography and I must follow to open space Wikipedia (where is it space???).

MY PHOTOS - I can not understand only why you violence my copyright for my own photos-portrait of me and my dog in my own flat??? As you can see on my website I have not "free license". All this photos is archive of my family and can be published only by member of my family or me in person. I am owner of copyright for all photos which show my person or any members of my family. I am sorry, but if you do not return my photos to me I will compensation claim for violence of my copyright, Sorry for that. I can see, how you are working with this "violence copyright" and I will follow same way as you.

Yes I do understand - Wikipedia includes articles about notable subjects. Yes, I am British artist and work with celebrities. i must have biography page as live person.

This subject is notable and there are multiple independently published reports about me it with in-depth coverage, published by outfits with reputation for editorial control and fact checking.

Sorry, I do not understand what is it "the creation of articles by editors with a conflict of interest".

STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN - this is violin legally registered in official copyright and trade mark offices in UK and around the world. As other violin, this STRADIVARY-JARIK VIOLIN must be published in your website. This information not for a social media site. This information for encyclopedia about collectable violin STRADIVARI-JARIK which beginning to be as rarity and collectable violin.

I am artist, collectors and founder and CEO of gallery which is as private gallery collection of my family. Not just for me.

The gallery was founded in 2016 and now I try provide information about this and about violin (which is part of collection of our family) copyright certificate and Trade mark certificate of STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN. I hope you will accept official trade mark certificate about this violin name. Intellectual property office UK did confirm name of this violin and issue official Registration Certificate. Your encyclopedia shut be accept this as well and publish article STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN. The reason my call to you - I can see few page about Stradivari violin or Stradivari family on your website and I think the STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN must be added in this list of Stradivari violin as part of items.

I try to found article and try to create article STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN with used your tools for creating and formatting text. At the moment I try to found options "references" in your tools.

If any volunteers who are willing to fix these things if given a reasonable starting point and help me - its will be great. And I need this help.

Sorry do not understand this message from you: "What we don't find as commonly are volunteers willing to find the notability and other references needed to get someone else's article started." - I so understand you are not accept the Intellectual Property office Registration Certificate for the real fact of this violin? - its correct?

What is it "shared accounts"? Its looking similar as join bank account or what it is in your website? Every contribution to Wikipedia in my page is recorded in a page's history and attributed to a specific contributor by way of either an IP address or a named account - yes I do understand and no problem at all.

Can not understand, why my assistant can not work in my account with my page on my behalf same as one of your volunteer??? What is the problem? I think you understand, a lot important person have their assistant who working as media assistand special for: creat page or websites for the under their behalf. I am sorry, I am artist and i can not spend a lot hours for work on your website. I need to do my job. Why I can not have assistant for create page on your website???

I try to understand how you are work. Your website is very difficult. Me and my assistant, we can not understand how you are working. We try to follow your rules, abut some of yours volunteers is very rude and do not help at all. We are not programmer and for us very difficult understand your tools, but we try to do this.

Unfortunately, you make "violence copyright" and "page delete" so fast, what we have no time to understand where is mistake and resolve the problem. Its terrible work some of your volunteers. You need understand - not all of user would like to be used wiki account for any spam or violence or work with you in future as yours volunteers. In my plan to create biography page and page for very important collection items.

Now i need understand how i can provide to you registration certificate as you accept its.

Yes you are right, your explain be hard to accept that you are telling me, so far, I try understand what contributions need have demonstrated my subjects meet your notability requirements. Thank you for understanding that someone can be successful, important, even famous.

So, can you or someone help me with create article about STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN? I will waiting when someone of your volunteer contact with me for help for this.

Because Its will be hard for me create article under your rules after last two days one of your volunteers attack me. I was take medicine tablets last two day and cry after discuss with him.

I will no longer create pages or articles myself, since you still delete everything. I spent a week of time on you, as a result I have nothing, my nerves are spoiled, and I didn’t complete my main work this week, as I tried to correspond with your volunteers for days. As you understand, it is impossible to continue. I must to do my job. But I will seek the publication of my biography and articles about collectible things here on your site. If some of your volunteers don’t appreciate my time and are rude to me, I will write directly to your head office and I’m sure that they will accept my complaint and publish my articles.

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 8:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC))
Why are there so many sections and duplicate posts on the same topic ... anyway I see that — jmcgnh has given you a pretty good reply. Wikipedia is not meant to be pseudobiographical. I would also suggest looking at WP:NOTEVERYTHING which has several sections on that page that may be relevant here. Sections such as wiki is not meant for publisher of original thought, not a soapbox or means of promotion, not a directory. And much more. As Jmcgnh has stated, inclusion for articles must be notable, it is not an all inclusive encyclopedia comprising of everything that exists. There can be exceptions to those rules of course, but that is rare and needs warranted justification.
I did a google search for your Stradivari-Jarik Violin for example which resulted in only 2 matchs, both from your own website LadyJuGallery. This means it is not that notable in of itself, HOWEVER if this a specific violin made by the famous Stradivari family, than that warrants an exception. This was a very popular and well known type of violin of which only roughly 1000 were made and of which roughly 450 - 500 still survive. As the WP:NOTEVERYTHING mentions, wiki is not meant for all inclusive directory listing and generally speaking there will not be an article for each and every one. However as this violin is so notable there has been a list page created, so at best this should be included on that page here: List of Stradivarius instruments which only has roughly half (248) listed. That would be about the extent of that violin, unless there is more to it than that.
As to artists, again the same Wiki rules and policies would apply as it does not list every single artist there ever was, nor every single art gallery around the world. Sorry but using owners webpages is generally frowned upon, as that more falls under the original content and bias. Can one find several sources for it, how newsworthy is it are just couple of questions I personally would use for consideration if it is notable or not. Is it something that everyone inside that industry will know about, or even better is it something that most general people will have heard about. Kevin "Hawk" Fisher (talk) 12:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply



The STRADIVARI-JARIK violin is officially registered as a trade mark and has the copyright certificate. The STRADIVARI-JARIK violin is property of a private collection and is not part of the mass media review. Therefore, there are not so many publications about it, I can found in Facebook, google, linled in, Lady Ju Gallery. The violin is not an object for publick access for photographer or mass media. The violin has official registrations in government departments of auto rights and trademark as a musical instrument Stradivari-yarik violin. You can check the STRADIVARI-JARIK registration references number in Intellectual property office UK on the goverment UK website and in Copyright UK website or call them. You can not put your opinion higher than the official government organizations that recognized the violin with this name STRADIVARI-JARIK. On this basis, I must ask you to create a page for the Stradivari-Yarik violin. All confirmation documents can be provided on request. thank you

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

Violence Jurita's copyright edit

On your site someone with user name Sergei Stepovoy violated my copyright on my photo. As result i was reported as "violence copyright" and my photos was been removed. I demand punishment for this user. Otherwise, I will claim to the court sue your site and your admins for my copyright infringement and support for users who violate my copyright.

There is a warning on my site: " Jurita Kalite and Lady Ju Gallery | © Photos Copyright Policy: All photos or image from this website, or photos made in Lady Ju Gallery, or show Ms Jurita Kalite portrait or member of her family included animals, are property of Ms Jurita Kalite and family. Published photos under copyright UK protection of Ms Jurita Kalite and family. No any of photographer or other person can not have copyright on this and can not processing the photos without owner permission. Thank you Lady Ju Gallery." http://ladyjugallery.co.uk/

tildes (Jurita Kalite (talk) 11:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC))Reply

January 2019 edit

 
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Значит, смотрите. Во-первых, темой выше вы угрожаете нам судом. Пока эта угроза будет висеть, Ваш эккаунт будет заблокирован. Если Вы хотите, чтобы он был разблокирован, первым делом уберите эту угрозу, а потом напишите просьбу о разблокировке и пообещаете никогда больше судом не угрожать - и, скорее всего, этих просьб придётся написать нескольк, вряд ли с первого раза у Вас получится убедить администраторов, что Вас можно разблокировать. Во-вторых, касательно страницы. У нас есть страницы не обо всех людях, а только о тех, которые удовлетворяют критериям значимости, WP:N. Более того, по нашему опыту, человек не может сам оценить, удовлетворяет он критериям значимости или нет, и мы не рекомендуем людям писать статьи о самих себе. Если Вы убеждены, что соответствуете критериям значимости, можете создать статью сами или попросить ассистанта - но это можно будет сделать только в пространстве имён Draft, то есть что-то типа Draft:/Jurita Kalite. Новые участники не могут создавать статьи в пространстве статей. Если Вы энциклопедически значимы, то кто-то перенесёт статью в пространство статей, там в шаблоне будут инструкции на эту тему. В-третьих, касательно фотографий. С ними имеются проблемы - они размещены на сайте, на котором стоит значок копирайта, кроме того, в метаданных автором указан не Вы, а совершенно другой человек. Единственный вариант тут - написать в commons:Commons:OTRS (там есть русскоязычные агенты), если они сочтут Ваши аргументы достаточно обоснованными, они восстановят фотографии, и Вы сможете их использовать.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Google translation for all non-Russian speakers (including me): "So, look. First, the topic above you threaten us with a trial. While this threat will hang, your account will be blocked. If you want it to be unblocked, first remove this threat, and then write a request for unblocking and promise never to threaten the court again - and, most likely, you will have to write several of these requests, it is unlikely that you will manage to convince the administrators from the first time you can unlock. Secondly, regarding the page. We do not have pages about all people, but only about those that meet the criteria of significance, WP: N. Moreover, in our experience, a person cannot assess for himself whether he meets the criteria of significance or not, and we do not recommend people to write articles about themselves. If you are convinced that you meet the criteria of significance, you can create an article yourself or ask for an assistant - but this can be done only in the Draft namespace, that is, something like Draft: / Jurita Kalite. New members cannot create articles in the article space. If you are encyclopedically significant, then someone will transfer the article into the article space, there will be instructions on this topic in the template. Thirdly, regarding photos. There are problems with them - they are placed on the site on which the copyright icon is, in addition, the author does not indicate you in the metadata, but a completely different person. The only option here is to write in commons: Commons: OTRS (there are Russian-speaking agents there), if they consider your arguments reasonable enough, they will restore the photos and you can use them."--Bbb23 (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
My apologies, I should have translated it myself. Whereas the English of the Google translation is not really perfect, it reasonably well conveys what I meant to say.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN edit

 

Hello, Jurita Kalite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "STRADIVARI-JARIK VIOLIN".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 14:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply