User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 67

Archive 60 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70

Your GA nomination of Corrida de Cori

The article Corrida de Cori you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Corrida de Cori for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,901   Ring of Fire (talk) Add sources
38   Fog season (talk) Add sources
10   Cyclone Klaus (talk) Add sources
40   Severe weather terminology (Canada) (talk) Add sources
1,036   Temperate climate (talk) Add sources
1,120   Humid subtropical climate (talk) Add sources
130   North Indian Ocean tropical cyclone (talk) Cleanup
12   Cyclone Niklas (talk) Cleanup
30   Cyclone Gudrun (talk) Cleanup
835   Megatsunami (talk) Expand
96   Surface-supplied diving (talk) Expand
29   Braer Storm (talk) Expand
600   La Palma (talk) Unencyclopaedic
11   North American High (talk) Unencyclopaedic
995   Oceanic climate (talk) Unencyclopaedic
30   Tuwana (talk) Merge
3,793   Tropical cyclone (talk) Merge
680   Molar ionization energies of the elements (talk) Merge
344   Cumbre Vieja (talk) Wikify
22   Berkeley Student Cooperative (talk) Wikify
27   Lunitidal interval (talk) Wikify
4   Pacific Centennial Oscillation (talk) Orphan
2   Yolanda Shea (talk) Orphan
9   Drought in Northeastern Brazil (talk) Orphan
9   Colorado low (talk) Stub
7   Cyclone Herwart (talk) Stub
4   Nevado San Francisco (talk) Stub
2   Cerro Tujle (talk) Stub
2   San Jerónimo volcano (talk) Stub
6   Cyclone Egon (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ahvaz on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard

Seems like the last five days have seen a steep increase in readership numbers on that article. Wonder what's been driving it and if the article as-is is providing good service to readers... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks again for the DYK review! I was actually just reading that article, and looking at who wrote it, to find it was you. The reason is that there is currently potential volcanic activity in the area - currently only an increase in earthquakes (up to 3.3 or so), and about a 10cm rising of the land in the area, no magma reaching the surface. For an example news report, see [7] or [8]. I've been watching this because I live on the next island over (Tenerife), and I'm probably going to be visiting La Palma in a few weeks time...
With the article, I think it over-describes the dramatic part of the analysis, and doesn't present the counter-views clearly enough, particularly in the lead. That's true both for the main article, and Cumbre Vieja (which has too much weight on the tsunami risk - most of that should be moved into the specific article). I think it's particularly important if the volcanic activity develops further, as then there would be a *lot* more attention on the article, as there would be a lot more media attention (there's already been some...). I'll try to help a bit with this soon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
@Mike Peel:I would probably not move anything from Cumbre Vieja to Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard, myself - it seems like it's mostly the same information as already in our article but more poorly written. I've taken an initial stab at emphasizing the critique in the lead section but I wonder if a better structure would help in the rest of the article at achieving the same goal - I am not sure the current format is the ideal one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Expect a lot more attention on this over the next few days - it erupted this afternoon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
I see, thanks for noting this. Say, Mike Peel, is there something like an official volcano observatory that deals with Cumbre Vieja? I can't find it on a quick search. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
INVOLCAN. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Great works and contributions Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 20:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
@Rahulsoman:Um, thanks, but I am pretty sure I have never designed any graphics here... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: I wanted to give a barnstar, I never noticed which class it is. :) leave it. Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 21:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

(For talk page readers) Featured article candidacy input request

El Tatio has been nominated as a Featured article candidate here to see if it satisfies these criteria; feel free to comment as the nomination will be archived if it gets no input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yonaguni Knoll IV

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yonaguni Knoll IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yonaguni Knoll IV

The article Yonaguni Knoll IV you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Yonaguni Knoll IV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

In appreciation

  The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the large number of thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

22:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake San Agustín

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lake San Agustín you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Sustainable energy

Hiya. I don't know whether you're interested in renewables more generally, but if you are, can I tempt you to review sustainable energy at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sustainable energy/archive1? FemkeMilene (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Note to self...

Hat-tip goes to Iridescent at WP:ANI In terms of byte-size, African humid period clocks in at a mere 0.45MB, between HiLo48's and Drmies's talk pages and actually less than Wikipedia's 0.61MB. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm wearily familiar with delivering that particular explanation, following the wars over User talk:EEng. The amount of text on a page is virtually irrelevant when it comes to server/browser load; even the most antiquated laptop can download and format an entire novel without any difficulty. What causes problems is fancy templates that invoke a ton of markup, and images (particularly gif files as Mediawiki doesn't automatically resize them but instead sends the full-size image to your browser and tells your cmputer to reformat it locally). Running pages through whatdoesmysitecost is often an eye-opening experience—because most Wikipedia editors are working on fixed, unlimited connections, it's easy to forget that graphic-and-formatting-heavy pages like Israel can be a significant expense to readers. (This is going to become an increasing issue for en-wiki, as Brexit has meant the return of roaming data charges for UK-based readers accessing Wikipedia from the EU/EEA.) ‑ Iridescent 08:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
What I found eye-opening - and in light of my firm opposition to splitting African humid period, good - is that AHP despite being slightly longer than Wikipedia and having twice as many references in raw prose size consumes less bandwidth. Wonder why that is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
If you drill down into the details page on the 'full results' tab, (African Humid Period, Wikipedia; the link from the main results page isnt obvious and is buried under "Want to make things better?") you can see what's actually causing the server and processor load. Unsurprisingly, it's the number of images that makes Wikipedia such a drain. ‑ Iridescent 12:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Yonaguni Knoll IV

On 1 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yonaguni Knoll IV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a "lake" of liquid CO
2
exists underground at Yonaguni Knoll IV?
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yonaguni Knoll IV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yonaguni Knoll IV), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your hook got 20,505 views (854 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2021—keep up the great work! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 03:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salar Ignorado

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salar Ignorado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Smallchief -- Smallchief (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism

On 9 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that monsoons in Asia may contribute to the dry climate of the Mediterranean during summer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rodwell-Hoskins mechanism. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salar Ignorado

The article Salar Ignorado you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Salar Ignorado for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Smallchief -- Smallchief (talk) 09:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of El Tatio

Congratulations, Jo-Jo Eumerus! The article you nominated, El Tatio, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA 2021 review update

Thanks so much for participating in Phase 1 of the RfA 2021 review. 8 out of the 21 issues discussed were found to have consensus. Thanks to our closers of Phase 1, Primefac and Wugapodes.

The following had consensus support of participating editors:

  1. Corrosive RfA atmosphere
    The atmosphere at RfA is deeply unpleasant. This makes it so fewer candidates wish to run and also means that some members of our community don't comment/vote.
  2. Level of scrutiny
    Many editors believe it would be unpleasant to have so much attention focused on them. This includes being indirectly a part of watchlists and editors going through your edit history with the chance that some event, possibly a relatively trivial event, becomes the focus of editor discussion for up to a week.
  3. Standards needed to pass keep rising
    It used to be far easier to pass RfA however the standards necessary to pass have continued to rise such that only "perfect" candidates will pass now.
  4. Too few candidates
    There are too few candidates. This not only limits the number of new admin we get but also makes it harder to identify other RfA issues because we have such a small sample size.
  5. "No need for the tools" is a poor reason as we can find work for new admins

The following issues had a rough consensus of support from editors:

  1. Lifetime tenure (high stakes atmosphere)
    Because RfA carries with it lifetime tenure, granting any given editor sysop feels incredibly important. This creates a risk adverse and high stakes atmosphere.
  2. Admin permissions and unbundling
    There is a large gap between the permissions an editor can obtain and the admin toolset. This brings increased scrutiny for RFA candidates, as editors evaluate their feasibility in lots of areas.
  3. RfA should not be the only road to adminship
    Right now, RfA is the only way we can get new admins, but it doesn't have to be.

Please consider joining the brainstorming which will last for the next 1-2 weeks. This will be followed by Phase 2, a 30 day discussion to consider solutions to the problems identified in Phase 1.


There are 2 future mailings planned. One when Phase 2 opens and one with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Best, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Gabbro question

Jo-Jo, I'm hoping you can answer a geology question for me. I just stubbed British Neolithic pottery, including a comment about one group of pots coming from an area of gabbroic clay in Cornwall. Looking at our article on gabbro I can make no sense of this -- gabbro is a hard rock. Does gabbroic in this sort of context mean that there are tiny fragments of rock in clay that can be identified as gabbro? That would mean that the pots can be section and the rock identified under a microscope, so I could see that making sense. The pots all come from a particular area, so presumably the gabbro involved has to be unique in some way so other sources of the clay can be discounted. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Close location

Hi Jo-Jo! I recently came across your close here. Writing just A closure statement will be posted on the talk page makes it very difficult to find the actual closure statement and separates it from the discussion it is actually closing. Could you please at least add a link to the statement? (This is coming up because there's a new related discussion, and I can't tell whether it's valid or just churning up a settled debate without reading the past discussion.) Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 17:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis

On 12 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the fixed anvil temperature hypothesis proposes that anvil clouds do not remove excess radiation as the Earth's surface temperature increases? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fixed anvil temperature hypothesis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake San Agustín

The article Lake San Agustín you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Lake San Agustín for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion review for Round World version of the Silmarillion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Round World version of the Silmarillion. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. SpinningSpark 09:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Uturuncu scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 24 November 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to comment on the draft blurb at TFA. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

@Gog the Mild:Er, where is the draft blurb? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) it's at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 24, 2021. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, it seems good to me. Note that I do the yearly update of all my articles including Uturuncu during/after the Christmas holidays, so it may be slightly out of date in November. I don't think there is any date that has specific importance for Uturuncu so I have no opinion on the exact day. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Tommaso Besozzi image

So, after more than 11 years since I uploaded this image File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg, you have decided to delete it. I don't know why you decided to do so and I am not even going to bother to challenge it, because I am going to lose that battle anyway, given that you have already decided that this non-free image is a terrible crime. You probably have followed all the bureaucratically right procedures and whatever I say will be dismissed. Fine, you won ...

The question is do the people who consider Wikipedia a reliable source of knowledge also win? I don't think so, because, and in particular with his image, an image gives readers something extra, and in this particular image that does reflect something of the despair that in the end led to the Mr Besozzi to commit suicide, they gain something extra. That said, you probably did not even bother to read the article ...

So, go ahead, just delete the image and pretend to feel you have contributed to Wikipedia. Frankly, I happen to disagree. You could also have decided to just ignore the obvious copy-right violations, and look the other way. In the past 11 years did anyone ever had a problem with this image, did anyone ever legally challenged it? I doubt that, but, please, prove me wrong. So, delete the image, no one is going to be upset if you do, and you have won your easy victory. Congratulations. And you can simply delete this message on your talk page, anyway ... User:DonCalo

@DonCalo:Uh, what? I didn't delete it, I proposed it for deletion. Not the same thing. And the reason the image is up for deletion is because we already have commons:File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg which will automagically appear if the local version under the same name is deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, my apologies, I did not understand that the same image was available at Wikicommons, so indeed it makes sense to delete it from Wikpedia. Once again, sorry for the misunderstanding. DonCalo (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ojos del Salado, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bivouac and Abrasion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

That's done, bot. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Fumarole mineral

  An article that you have been involved in editing—Fumarole mineral—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

20:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)