Talk:Lake San Agustín

Lake San Agustín has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 12, 2021. (Reviewed version).

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake San Agustín is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"lake san augustín" OR "paleolake san augustín" OR "lakes san augustín" OR "paleolakes san augustín" OR "lake san augustin" OR "paleolake san augustin" OR "lakes san augustin" OR "paleolakes san augustin"
Google
"lake san agustín" OR "paleolake san agustín" OR "lakes san agustín" OR "paleolakes san agustín" OR "lake san agustin" OR "paleolake san agustin" OR "lakes san agustin" OR "paleolakes san agustin"
Google
("san augustíne plains" OR "plains of san augustíne" OR "san agustíne plains" OR "plains of san agustíne" OR "san augustine plains" OR "plains of san augustine" OR "san agustine plains" OR "plains of san agustine") AND ("lake" OR "lakes" OR "lacustrine
Google
("san augustíne plains" OR "plains of san augustíne" OR "san agustíne plains" OR "plains of san agustíne" OR "san augustine plains" OR "plains of san augustine" OR "san agustine plains" OR "plains of san agustine") AND ("paleolake" OR "paleolakes" )
Google
("san augustín plains" OR "plains of san augustín" OR "san agustín plains" OR "plains of san agustín" OR "san augustin plains" OR "plains of san augustin" OR "san agustin plains" OR "plains of san agustin") AND ("paleolake" OR "paleolakes" )
Google
("san augustín plains" OR "plains of san augustín" OR "san agustín plains" OR "plains of san agustín" OR "san augustin plains" OR "plains of san augustin" OR "san agustin plains" OR "plains of san agustin") AND ("lake" OR "lakes" OR "lacustrine" )
Google

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago15 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lake San Agustín/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 02:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this soon. AryKun (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"in New Mexico which developed in the Plains of San Agustín during the Pleistocene, as a pluvial lake during glacial periods."→ "in New Mexico which developed as a pluvial lake in the Plains of San Agustín during glacial periods during the Pleistocene"
Applied a variation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"while during its drying it split into several separate lakes" → " and split into several separate lakes while drying out"
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a need to give the acronym for Last Glacial Maximum as it isn't mentioned again in the lead.
It is mentioned elsewhere in the article however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"At highstand" → "During its highstand" Also, highstand should be linked here
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"300 metres (980 ft) long drill core" → Should be metre, not metres.
Sorry, but I don't know how to change this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
" made into the" → "of the"
Applied a variation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"Lakes may have existed" → Should the may be removed?
No; it's not settled into stone. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"By 11,300-10,200 years ago, it" → Clarify what the "it" is.
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
"when it was dropping" → "when it was shrinking"
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Pine, spruce, Pleistocene are dublinked.
Will do so soon. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The list of mammals is just a sea of blue at the moment, perhaps you could add the scientific names to stagger it out?
I don't think that would really help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I feel like the lead could be bulked up, as it doesn't quite cover the whole article.
Remind me, what other things could be mentioned? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I'll be passing. AryKun (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Pretty comprehensive article, but I have some issues with the prose. I've made some minor edits, and the rest of my suggestions are above.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Add topic