Talk:Corrida de Cori

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Corrida de Cori/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 22:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• "5 kilometres (3.1 mi) elevation" either "in elevation" or "above an elevation of 5 "
• "The range together with several local volcanoes " -> "The range, together with several local volcanoes, "
• "the Plio-Pleistocene" vs " of Pliocene-Pleistocene" forgive my ignorance, but is this the same? The linking is different...
• Argentina–Chile border has an article, and it uses an en-dash too.
• "lava flows" link?
• Link lineament.
• "and ENE lineaments" what's ENE?
• "magma ascent" link?

  There isn't a link for this, but I've explained in the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "primitive basaltic lavas" link?

  I can't find an usable definition of the term, so I've cut it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "Imilac-Salina" en-dash.
• "15-20 mya" en-dash and link mya.
• "1-2 " en-dash.
• "basaltic andesites and dacitic ignimbrites and ended in the late Quaternary with basaltic andesites in form of cinder cones" link all these jargon terms.
• "aeolian activity" link.
• "hydrothermal alteration" link.
• "These Escorial lava flows are" repetitive.
• A lot of those terms I mention above appear to be linked, just not first time.
• "fumarole spires" link.
• "crustal origin" link.

  Rewrote this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "fumarolic alteration" link.

  Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "at an altitude" elevation.
• "about 1,392 millimetres" "about" and then given to the nearest mm??

  Cut the "about", it's based on a weather station there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "1976-1977" en-dash.
• "reported in 1976-1977" ditto.
• "p.190" it's normal to have a space between p. and the number.

  You sure? I don't think I see such a space frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

  I see a space everywhere. The {{citation}} templates put a space in after the p. or pp. It's absolutely the case. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

  @The Rambling Man:Added it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

• "pp.181-182" -> pp. 181–182
• "1976-1977" in ref 1 should use en-dash.

Lots of jargon makes this practically inaccessible to non-experts, and a few other formatting issues. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man:Replied and processed everything else. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)