User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 52
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- MediaWiki2LaTeX can put different pages from a Wikimedia wiki into a PDF. It can now make a PDF with around 5000 pages. Previously this was 800 pages.
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Wikimedia will take part in Google Code-in. This is for young students who want to help with open source software. You can read more. Experienced technical Wikimedians can mentor students.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do you know what's going on with this file? It was discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 18#File:Nuclear power is not healthy poster.jpg and you closed the discussion as "delete". There, however, is nothing in the page's history or the log which shows that the file was ever deleted. I'm asking about this because the file has just been tagged for speedy deletion per F5 which seems odd. Some other odd things are that there's no file displayed on the file's page (only a link to a non-existent file), and there's no indication given of the page being refunded or recreated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Greetings, Marchjuly. I am guessing I simply forgot to press "delete" when I closed that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look. The page would likely now be eligible for CSD per WP:F2 I guess. Seems unnecessary to wait for F5 unless some is possibly currently requesting a WP:REFUND. it also seems a bit odd that a bot only picked up on the F5 only now, apparently a year after the file most likely became an orphan. Do you think this is some kind of bug? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've deleted it under F2. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look. The page would likely now be eligible for CSD per WP:F2 I guess. Seems unnecessary to wait for F5 unless some is possibly currently requesting a WP:REFUND. it also seems a bit odd that a bot only picked up on the F5 only now, apparently a year after the file most likely became an orphan. Do you think this is some kind of bug? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Southcott (band) DRV
Did you mean to say "incorrect" here, instead of "correct"? -- RoySmith (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, corrected it. My typing skills that morning were rather poor. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus,
I wanted to commend you for your thoughtful, reasoned closing analysis and consensus determination (or lack thereof, in this case) at the Jo-Ann Roberts (2nd nomination) deletion discussion. Your analysis thoughtfully and rationally considered all arguments and, in this way, should be highlighted as a feature decision that AfD is notionally not a vote. For example, despite the number of "keeps" outweighing the "delete" or "redirects," the strength of the arguments put forward by those !voting in the minority shines through in your determination. Anyway, just wanted to thank you for this closing rationale. It is truly the best AfD closing rationale I've read thus far. For this, although somewhat non-specific, I award you an Admin Barnstar. Thanks again,
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Andagua volcanic field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Crust
- Purupuruni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Aeolian
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
At Oakshade (talk · contribs)'s DRV for Lera Loeb at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 November 4#Lera Loeb, you wrote:
I know that sometimes we treat "No consensus" on reviews of speedy deletions as "list at AFD"; the reasons I didn't go for this here are that a) whether to do this has been extensively debated here already and b) a lot of people are hinting that an AFD would likely result as "delete".
Wikipedia:Deletion review#Closing reviews says:
If a speedy deletion is appealed, the closer should treat a lack of consensus as a direction to overturn the deletion, since it indicates that the deletion was not uncontroversial (which is a requirement of almost all criteria for speedy deletion). Any editor may then nominate the page at the appropriate deletion discussion forum. But such nomination is in no way required, if no editor sees reason to nominate.
Please reclose the DRV as "speedy deletion overturned owing to a lack of consensus" as required by the DRV closing instructions.
I also do not find the reasons for not listing at AfD to be compelling. DRV is focused on process and AfD is focused on discussing sources. Many editors did not discuss sources at the DRV because they were focused on process. An AfD would give editors the opportunity to focus on discussing the sources. I found this DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Recent discussions and was not a participant in it. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oi. Seems like I forgot that line; I've restored it. I am not convinced by your argument on the not-listing-at-AFD question, though; the people in the deletion review were discussing sources to a substantial degree and there was little indication that they would be considered to be adequate at AFD stage (for example, there was little indication that there was more than one GNG-qualifying source). Besides, the concern about pursuing ultimately useless processes was articulated in the deletion review and long historical experience indicates that they can be indeed harmful. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- You will be able to read but not to edit some wikis for up to 30 minutes on 26 November at 06:00 (UTC). You can see which wikis. It will probably last much shorter than 30 minutes. This will also affect the
centralauthdatabase. This could for example affect changing passwords, logging in to new wikis, changing emails or global renames. [1]
Changes later this week
- You can soon vote on proposals for the Community Wishlist Survey. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can vote on proposals from 20 November to 2 December. This year the wishlist will focus on Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversity, Wikispecies, Wikivoyage and Wikinews. You can read more about the format for this year.
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 20 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for salting the article
Hey. Thanks for salting List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming. I think it'll be a while before I close an AfD of such a big and old article using the new gadget XFDcloser. It was an unnerving experience, as I complained here, and seemed to take an age, or I would have got to the creation protection a bit faster. Guess what, the article talkpage still hasn't been deleted..! Bishonen | talk 22:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC).
- Gern geschehen. I see RHaworth has requested the deletion of the talk page on Meta as it's above the size limit for admin deletions. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Thank you for your good work at AfD. I am glad that we have excellent contributors like you patrolling the AfD pages. DBigXrayᗙ 06:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC) |
Global watchlist - Update 3
Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:
- Survey
- I am investigating adding more context to each entry that is shown (such as the edit summaries, tags, patrol marks, the user who made the edit, etc.). Is there any desire for such additions? If so, what should be added first, and what is a low priority? Please leave feedback on the relevant phabricator task, phab:T238300.
- Recent additions
- Site validation has been overhauled. Rather than hard-coding a list of valid sites, users will be able to watch any site where they have an attached local user account. If a site is rejected as invalid, please ensure that there is indeed a local account attached to your global account.
- Users will now be alerted regarding the results of attempting to update their settings.
- Live updates have been added - when activated, the script will refresh in the background, and then load the new feed, every 7.5 seconds. In the future, this frequency may be configurable.
- OOUI icons have been added to most buttons.
- There is now an option to eliminate the confirmation dialog when marking all sites as seen.
- Announcements
- WARNING: Starting with version 6.1, site aliases currently used when saving settings will be removed, and only sites in the form of `lang.project` will be accepted.
- As noted in the last update, marking a site as seen now uses
entirewatchlist, which means that any changes to watched pages between when the watchlist was loaded and when the site was "marked as seen" may be ignored.
- Next release
Version 6.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.
Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 21:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --TomStar81 (Talk) 14:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Kyliegh Curran & Doctor Sleep
In the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyliegh Curran, the last editor (HM Wilburt) to participate in the discussion (the only one who supported a redirect) recommended "Redirect to Doctor Sleep (for now)." The link used by HM Wilburt points to Doctor Sleep (2019 film), pipe labeled simply "Doctor Sleep".
Then you stated, "The result was redirect to Doctor Sleep." Which is a link to a disambiguation page.
TomStar81 then implemented your result of the discussion and we now have Kyliegh Curran redirecting to a DAB page and is admin protected.
I believe this was probably all just an oversight. If so, please change the redirect to point to Doctor Sleep (2019 film). If not, then please explain these actions. --DB1729 (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- My apologies, I'll get right on that. Thanks for pointing it out. TomStar81 (Talk) 15:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @DB1729:No, that was just an oversight/link confusion; I've amended the close and changed the redirect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The mobile beta mode will be disabled to have less maintenance. The developers will focus on the desktop improvements project. You can turn on advanced mobile contributions mode if you want to see the categories. You could also jump back to the top. This can instead be done with a gadget or user script. [2]
- Parsoid is software we use for the visual editor, content translation, Flow and the Android app. This has been rewritten. It will come to the wikis gradually over the next two weeks. It has been tested, but there could be some diffs or previews that don't look right. If you see any you can report them. [3]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 November. It will be on the other wikis next week (calendar). This is because of holidays.
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 27 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You will switch between the article and the talk page in a new way in the mobile view in the future. It will use tabs. This is more like in the desktop view. [4]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
Canadian Business College
You had this article deleted from Wikipedia and I believe you’ve made an error and suggest you look at similar sites such as Trios College, Herzing College, CDI College and many more.
There are over 600 career colleges in Ontario alone and often competitors will sabotage others to mark deletions and such.
I’m no longer associated with any college but was once a Director for the association as well as the Toronto Training Board which was a non profit organization placed by the government.
I suggest you either remove all career colleges or allow for them all. I don’t see anything particularly different from the Canadian Business College site from the others. MarzJ (talk) 19:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Courtesy link. @MarzJ:, as you can see the page was deleted because this particular college did not satisfy WP:N guidelines, that does not mean that any other career colleges is now automatically up for deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
How much were you paid to delete a perfectly good article
You absolutely ignored my comments and this makes me very suspicious why you would work so hard to have the article deleted.
Please respond to my comments and if you cannot I will fight to have you removed for possible corruption MarzJ (talk) 06:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) For readers' info, this apparently concerns Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Business College (2nd nomination).
- @MarzJ: Please calm down. Jo-Jo's sole involvement, as far as I can see, was to step in as an uninvolved administrator to close a discussion at AfD. Such discussions are not a vote, but it is noticeable that only two editors argued to keep the article,four or so supported its deletion. Your post above is insulting and inappropriate. Do you have a Conflict of interest about this article, as you seem so passionate about it? PamD 07:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've merged this query with the last one about this topic, as contrary to what MarzJ is claiming I did in fact reply there:
@MarzJ:, as you can see the page was deleted because this particular college did not satisfy WP:N guidelines, that does not mean that any other career colleges is now automatically up for deletion.
The only thing that I did was to make a pass across the AFDs that closed that day and closed that one as it seemed to have clear consensus. I also think it's rather impolite to make completely baseless accusations of being corrupt or being paid to edit, and we do in fact have a policy prohibiting that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- I've merged this query with the last one about this topic, as contrary to what MarzJ is claiming I did in fact reply there:
need to see info on deleted page
Hey @Jo-Jo Eumerus:, can you help me see what a deleted article and/or sandbox looked like before its removal? |Zanhe|Sagotreespirit. I figure that once you are done withj Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC) I have since been informed that using wikipedia for students assignments is in violation of the WP:Student assignments policy, and I won't do it again.
My students clearly missed the bar on this one: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/11_11_Taobao_Shopping_festival. That said, I need to evaluate the page and give the students a grade. Is there any way for me to see what the page looked like before deletion? Likewise, is the article recoverable from where the student built it, here User:Qian_Wang_Amy/sandbox?
I've learned my lesson on this one. But a handful of my students are awaiting a grade I can't give them without seeing what their page last looked like, and I would really appreciate being able to grade it before it disappears into the ether. Jim37hike (talk) 07:38, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jim37hike:Huh. I don't think that this is technically covered under policy, but I'll invoke WP:IAR and restore the deleted content to User:Qian Wang Amy/sandbox, User:Qian Wang Amy/sandbox 2 and User:Qian Wang Amy/sandbox 3 respectively. I'll ping the participants in the discussion and deleting admins elsewhere in case they have objections, @RHaworth, DemonDays64, DGG, Kinu, LuK3, Hog Farm, Coolabahapple, Zanhe, and Sagotreespirit:. I figure that once you are done with the pages, your student should tag them for deletion with {{db-u1}}. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus:Wow, thank you so, so much. (My students will be grateful too, once they know how close to the edge they came!) I'll grade the pages in the next 24hrs, and then have the student delete 'em ASAP. Thanks. Jim37hike (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jim37hike: see this IA copy of it, which almost definitely won't be deleted, for a more permanent copy. DemonDays64 | Tell me if I'm doing something wrong :P 15:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
FWIW, I agree with using IAR to undelete temporarily in this circumstance. DGG ( talk ) 00:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Mix'n'match is a tool to connect Wikidata items to information in other databases. It can be used to find subjects that are missing in a Wikipedia. It now has more than 3000 datasets. Before it was closer to 2000.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 3 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 4 December. It will be on all wikis from 5 December (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 4 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- There will be a new schema for XML dumps. Scripts and apps that use them will need to be updated. If they are not updated they will no longer work. [5]
- The
{{REVISIONID}}magic word will no longer work in the content namespaces. This is for performance reasons. When you preview a page it returns""(empty string). When you read a page it returns"-"(dash). In the future this will also affect other namespaces. The next ones are file and category namespaces. [6]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Articles to work on
Ciomadul, 1257 Samalas eruption, Laguna Amarga and this and Pali Aike, these few ones. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
My ArbCom votes, in case anyone cares
I know that ArbCom votes are meant to be cast in the privacy of SecurePoll, but I'll state mine anyway seeing as the election is over but the results not yet announced:
- Supported Kudpung, Worm That Turned, Newyorkbrad and The Rambling Man.
- Opposed Llywrch, Gadfium, SoWhy, Beeblebrox, Calidum, DGG, Bradv, Isarra, Hawkeye7 and Thryduulf.
- Neutral on all others.
There were a bunch of considerations, from experience levels to their relations to the WMF given WP:FRAM. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Media bias against Bernie Sanders
Hi, Just immediately after you closed the AfD, an editor started a new one. Could you do something about this? thanks--SharabSalam (talk) 18:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- WP:DPAFD: "Renominations: After a deletion debate concludes and there is no consensus or the consensus is in favor of keeping the page, users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating the same page for deletion again, to give editors the time to improve the page. Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome." I am trying to improve the name and the article but an editor unilaterally nominated the article for deletion again just mins after you closed the AfD.--SharabSalam (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- @SharabSalam:I see that Ylevental has withdrawn their nom. Incidentally, I don't think that the talk page should have more than one move discussion open on it; you probably should merge it into a single open-ended move discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus, He opened a second move discussion which I removed. I opened the first one.--SharabSalam (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- @SharabSalam:I see that Ylevental has withdrawn their nom. Incidentally, I don't think that the talk page should have more than one move discussion open on it; you probably should merge it into a single open-ended move discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyclonic Niño, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Wikimedia projects use Translatewiki to translate the wiki interface. You can now use WatchTranslations to watch projects there. You would get an email if there are missing translations to your language. [7]
- There is a new dataset you can use. It shows the number of editors per country per month for a number of countries. You can read the documentation and download the dataset.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 December. It will be on all wikis from 12 December (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 11 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can test a new reference tool. It makes it possible to reference different parts of a source without repeating all information. You can test it on the beta cluster. You can see an example article. [8]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you today for Limalok, "about another underwater mountain in the Marshall Islands which was formerly an atoll, similar to the other recent FA Wōdejebato, and has a similar history although it is located in a different part of the Marshall Islands: It's a former volcano in French Polynesia which became first an atoll as plate tectonics moved it north, then it disappeared below the water and is now a seamount at the southeastern end of the Marshall Islands."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
edit fully-protected
I have followed the guideline that you've set out on the bad image list, it should now work. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 14:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
request copy deleted article
Hi, could you please provide a copy to my userspace of the article which was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Hardy CK, which you closed? (so to User:Doncram/Jennifer Hardy CK i guess). I did not see the article, but I posted a sympathetic note to the article creator's Talk page soon after the AFD, a few months ago, and they have just replied to my Talk page. Based on the AFD discussion I do rather assume the decision to delete was fine, but I would like to give further advice. Depending on the content, I would try to consider whether mentioning the actor's name in some other article would be appropriate or not. And i would share my opinion to them. Thanks in advance, --Doncram (talk) 04:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note that the article appears to have been an autobiography. Perhaps we should wait for someone uninvolved to create a new article if she is notable enough. PamD 08:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Userfied this. For an autobio it doesn't read that promotional. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)