Jlvshistory

Welcome!

Hi Jlvshistory! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Oh, thank you man, thank you so much Jlvshistory (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebralinag v School Superintendent has been accepted

Ebralinag v School Superintendent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fletcher Ladd has been accepted

Fletcher Ladd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

ohh, thank you man Jlvshistory (talk) 06:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jimenez v. Cañizares has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jimenez v. Cañizares. Thanks! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Finley Johnson has been accepted

Elias Finley Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Annh07 (talk) 11:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much Jlvshistory (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hi Jlvshistory! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh..Thank you for correcting me, I'm so sorry😅 Jlvshistory (talk) 11:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Elias Finley Johnson

Hello, I just finished cleaning up Elias Finley Johnson. Thank you for contributing all that content - it's valuable, and appreciated. However, your text contained a lot of errors; pretty much every sentence needed corrections. In the future, please consider having someone look over your content before submitting it, or at least run it through a spellcheck. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your concern, I accept your concern and appreciate it, even though I check my draft before submitting and editing many times, but maybe sometimes I didn't check my drafts for mistakes but I will note this anyway. Again, Thank you for your concern😊 Jlvshistory (talk) 06:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimenez v. Cañizares (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimenez v. Cañizares and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Okay, I will remove the unreliable source, thank your concern, but the reason why I put my citation it's because I need a summary about the case Jlvshistory (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jlvshistory! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Creative Korea Party ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Im so sorry, I realized in split seconds that is has a word 'wiki' in it, I apologize if I ignore it, I will not do it again Jlvshistory (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iowa Perry High School Shooting (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iowa Perry High School Shooting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

I intended to modify to draft it into deletion,Im so sorry because I didn't see it yesterday that it was already made Jlvshistory (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Image copyright

Hi Jlvshistory, You recently uploaded an image of a TikTok to Perry High School shooting. The image was removed because it is likely to be deleted from Wikimedia Commons due to lack of proof that it is free content. For future reference, unless you have proof of a relevant license or it is your own work, you should not upload an image to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. For further information, see Commons:Licensing. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Wracking ^talk! 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

But I get it from ABC and other news outlets or website, Does it count as a copy right strike? Jlvshistory (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons only hosts content that is free, meaning there are specific instructions from the creator that it can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. Unless you have that proof, you should not upload a file.

There is no such thing as a "copyright strike" here (like there is on YouTube or other sites), but repeated additions of non-free content could lead to a user being blocked. See the image I've added to this comment for more info. Let me know if you have any more questions. Wracking ^talk! 05:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern, but I accidentaly typed 'copyright strikes' instead of 'copyright' my bad, thank you for concern Jlvshistory (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

thank you very much for understanding* Jlvshistory (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salinas v. Texas has been accepted

Salinas v. Texas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

alright, thank you Jlvshistory (talk) 10:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Again, I ask that you please take more care that your work meets the guidelines of the Manual of Style. Your recent edit of John Frow added an ungrammatical sentence and many inappropriate capital letters. In general, Wikipedia uses sentence case, so it's "Professor, author" instead of "Professor, Author" in the infobox, for example.

I see that you are making good contributions here, but please do your best to make sure that others don't have to clean up after you. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I apologize to that but I promise I will do my best, thank you for understanding Jlvshistory (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Benjamin Anyene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rex Heuermann (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rex Heuermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

But I can still improve it? Jlvshistory (talk) 03:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jlvshistory. Thank you for your work on Jimenez v. Cañizares. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

{{Re|North800}} thank you for your comment Jlvshistory (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Morton (governor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

• How is this [1] or this [2] constructive, or any better than vandalism?

2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

• • To partially answer my question, I've looked at a few more of your edits, and it seems there's a problem anytime you're not merely copying citations and have to write something in your own words. The notice above from January is still relevant. You probably should not be editing grammar or adding content at English Wikipedia. Thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

    I sincerely apologized for not reading Wikipedia's guidelines thoroughly, I promised I will read the Wikipedia's guidelines even more Jlvshistory (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I've tried my best to edit this wikipedia page but alright Jlvshistory (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

And right after your response here, you did this [3], which ignores WP:ENGVAR and MOS:OL, among other guidelines. Please stop, or I will ask for administrative intervention. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 03:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

alright but can I stay there and not delete my account? Jlvshistory (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I didn't linked any general words on that article, I remove all of linked general words Jlvshistory (talk) 07:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jlvshistory. Thank you for your work on Jimenez v. Cañizares. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Per the above messages, it's probably best that you not edit at English Wikipedia. If disruptions continue, I will ask for administrative assistance.

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

What are you referring to? Jlvshistory (talk) 11:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Most of you latest edit was copied from its source. How can you not know what I'm referring to? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm writing with my own words using these sources, I don't know what problems do you want me to see, In fact, I also remove unecessary links that I believe was unecessary because they are generalized word and obviously not needed to be linked Jlvshistory (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

No, you're copying text almost verbatim. When you write in your own words, as in your comments here, your English has not been adequate to edit here. That you don't seem to understand the problem, is a problem. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, if that's the case my bad but sometimes I copy some words and then I will type it with my own words, and also you reverse some of my edits such as reversing " James Ingraham et al. v. Willie J. Wright, et al." to "Ingraham et al. v. Wright, et al." which is I believe which is wrong because it supposedly the full case name, and that's exactly the template of the infobox. But, anyways, to be honest, I'll decide to be inactive in Wikipedia, if I did something wrong Jlvshistory (talk) 11:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:United States v Macintosh

Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States v Macintosh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Montgomery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union

Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Shuckburgh(surgeon)

Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Shuckburgh(surgeon), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barrows v. Jackson

Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barrows v. Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Macke v. Camps

Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Macke v. Camps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)