Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Jlvshistory (talk | contribs) 5 months ago. (Update) |
Macke v. Camps is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines that declares that a person can't legally or rightfully represent the employee without a recognition of the employee, this decision is also made under the Philippine Insular Government, and one of the earliest case of the Supreme Court of the Philippines.[1]
Macke et al. v. Camps | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of the Philippines en banc |
Full case name | |
B.H. Macke, W.H. Chandler v. Jose Camps | |
Decided | Febuary 27 1907 |
Citation | G.R. No. 2962 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Ponente | Adam C. Carson, Cayetano Arellano, Victorino Mapa, Elias Finley Johnson, Charles A. Willard, James F. Tracy |
Concurrence | Arellano, Torres, Willard |
Dissent | Tracey |
References edit
- ^ "G.R. No. L-2962 February 27, 1907 - B. H. MACKE v. JOSE CAMPS007 Phil 553 : February 1907 - Philipppine Supreme Court Decisions". chanrobles.com. Retrieved 2023-11-20.