User talk:Hugo999/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hugo999. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Sausage Party
Because for a Good Reason why. Sausage Party is released in a 2010s year, 2016. Makes sense to you?
I'm just want the Page not to be Added Unsorcedly and/or Vandalized. ZeEnergizer (talk) 04:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
No, because the category Category:2010s animated films (and the Category:2010s films) are container categories so articles appear in the year subcategories but not the decade container category. Hence this film should be in Category:2016 animated films not the parent (container) category Category:2010s animated films. Whereas Category:2010s adventure films and Category:2010s comedy films are not subcategoriserd by year (though they do have subcategories by subgenre) and articles are directly in the decade category. Hugo999 (talk) 05:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Wildfire
Hello! I have recently started a new WikiProject and am trying to recruit new members. The project, WikiProject Wildfire, focuses on articles that relate to wildfires. There is a lot of work that needs to be done. From updating templates, to classifying and improving articles. Any level of commitment is welcome! If you care to just add some input on the founding of the new project, awesome. If you would like to take an active role in editing articles, that is awesome as well! Knowledge of wildfires is NOT a prerequisite for joining the project. In fact, it would be great to have some members of the project who are NOT fire-buffs. That way we make sure that articles aren't just written by and for people in the fire community. If this is something you have any interest in, I would love to have you join the project! Please feel free to join the discussion or leave me a message on my talk page. (Note that you are receiving this message from me because I saw you made multiple edits on a wildfire related page, specifically Griffith Park Fire. Not just spamming you at random.) Hope you have a great day! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Historical alcoholic drinks has been nominated for discussion
Category:Historical alcoholic drinks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Energy resource facilities in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Energy resource facilities in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 11:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:19th-century Church of Ireland church buildings
Have a look at the version history. You'll see that the original name conformed to agreed name at WP:CFD. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
The category Category:19th-century Church of Ireland church buildings already existed (from 2011) when I created the 18th-century category to match it. Although the parent categories Category:19th-century Anglican churches etc. had been changed from “church buildings” to “churches” the subcategories for Ireland and Wales had not been changed. Hence I also created 20th century and 18th-century categories to match Category:19th-century Church in Wales church buildings (created 2015). They could be nominated for speedy renaming if you think so. Hugo999 (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. I think that these gaps in the CFD nomination should be filled. As you say, speedy would be sufficient. Laurel Lodged (talk) 07:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:Unitarian Universalist churches in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Unitarian Universalist churches in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pwolit iets (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:Unitarian Universalist churches in Canada has been nominated for discussion
Category:Unitarian Universalist churches in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pwolit iets (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Years in international relations
You should be aware that there's a general move against individual year categories in the 1st millennium (and in some cases up to the 15th century or so), specifically if you'd actually tried to create the red-linked category you left with this edit you'd have seen that Category:901 in international relations was deprecated by this CFD.Le Deluge (talk) 09:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Well, included just in case, although extension back to this century is unlikely as you say Hugo999 (talk) 21:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- But you just end up creating work for other people fixing all the categories that shouldn't have been added in the first place. Here's another example of why it's worth trying to create a red-linked category - you would have seen the link to the CfD where Category:Film directors by century was deprecated because there's not been enough centuries with films for it to be anything other than a WP:SMALLCAT.Le Deluge (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Shopping malls and restaurants
Aren't retail companies. Shopping malls are real estate companies, often Real Estate Investment Trusts also known as a REIT.
Restaurants are regarded by the US Census bureau as 'Food Services and Drinking Places'. They are service businesses....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Re shopping malls, the main parent category is Category:Retail buildings. And there are early markets and bazaars (retail establishments) in Category:Shopping malls established in 113 and Category:Shopping malls established in 1460 Hugo999 (talk) 23:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Category:1795 establishments in Ohio has been nominated for discussion
Category:1795 establishments in Ohio, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:7th century in Iraq has been nominated for discussion
Category:7th century in Iraq, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GreyShark (dibra) 13:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Hugo999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Nobel laureates from Northern Ireland
Hi Hugo999, I notice that you have worked on Category:Nobel laureates from Northern Ireland. The page contains the sentence:
- Laureates listed should also be listed under "British Nobel laureates"
And yet, at the bottom of the page we see: Category:British Nobel laureates
Doesn't this mean that listing these people in British Nobel laureates is automatically implied. I had the impression that such "redundant" categorization was discouraged by Wikipedia (how many levels up should one stop?)
What is the answer to this apparent contradiction? Thanks--Toploftical (talk) 16:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The subcategories are not superfluous, but it helps to have a reminder that many English Nobel laureates (say) may be in the category British Nobel laureates. The subcategories should probably be labeled as “non-diffusing” though; like Category:Indian women engineers who should also be in the category Category:Indian engineers. Hugo999 (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
New Challenge for Oceania and Australia
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:Women boxers by nationality has been nominated for discussion
Category:Women boxers by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for merge to Category:Women boxers. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Karosseriebau Autenrieth
Pls check cats also on Karosseriebau Autenrieth, thx --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 14:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Have altered the 1964 disestablished category to Companies disestablished .... as there are not many subcategories for types of countries (or to Transport companies disestablished ... (generally there are fewer "disestablished" subcategories compared with "established" subcategories) Hugo999 (talk) 19:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Will look at in a day or two Hugo999 (talk) 02:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
can i help me?
i have medal table of asian shooting championship. please creat medal table of page for it in independent page. i dont know and i cant. thanks Swimflower (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Will look at in a day or two Hugo999 (talk) 02:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
  
|
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
Category:15th-century Church of England churches has been nominated for discussion
Category:15th-century Church of England churches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 15:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:17th century in Paraguay has been nominated for discussion
Category:17th century in Paraguay, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hugo999, would you mine explaining this edit? It was absent an edit summary. It appears the original cats survived (must be embedded in the replacement template). However, there is now two redundant sentences above and the placement of Category:2015 disestablishments in Manitoba between the second sentence and the navigation bar with the various years is sort of random. Respectfully, Hwy43 (talk) 04:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I have been adding the navigation template for establishments in several Canadian provinces including Manitoba. I am not sure why the template adds the disestablishment category (usually it says "see also disestablishments in that year"). The "redundant" text is an explanatory re the category that was originally there but is not strictly necessary so will leave out. I have been through all the "establishments in Nova Scotia by year" since 1867, as some of the existing categories had only two or three of the four parent categories they should have (often missing the year or "18XY in Nova Scotia" category eg Category:1888 establishments in Nova Scotia). Hugo999 (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Massacres in North Korea has been nominated for discussion
Category:Massacres in North Korea, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Equestrian sports in the United States Virgin Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:7th century in Ethiopa
A tag has been placed on Category:7th century in Ethiopa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 4 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the CEAT (company) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1573 in Poland
A tag has been placed on Category:1573 in Poland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Worcestershire Project Barnstar.
Hello Hugo999, First of all I want to tell, that all my life I dreamed to visit New Zealand, as I think, that this Country is one of the most beautiful in the World, but wasn’t yet able fulfil this dream. So, now about my message: I’m sending it to you, as I have noticed that you made a contribution to the article St Swithun's Church, Worcester. Recently I found out, that on Wikipedia exists a very good Project, called WP:WORCS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Worcestershire I became very interested, as I’m planning to visit the Archaeological sites in Worcestershire, make good photos and then to start an article about Archaeological findings of Worcestershire. I think, that WP:WORCS deserves to have its own symbol - a Barnstar, what will also work as momentum of positive energy, that will help to make this Project a bit more active: it’s in need of it. So, as a participant of the Wikipedia Awards Project I decided to create WORCS Barnstar: the emblem, used by Worcestershire units at the Battle of Agincour (now this emblem decorates the Flag of Worcestershire) - county's famed black pear - became the central motive of Worcestershire Barnstar. If you will have a couple of minutes, please have a look at the page WikiProject Wikipedia Awards talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wikipedia_Awards and if in your opinion this Barnstar is worth it (I tried my best) — give a support. Your participation will be highly appreciated. Regards, Chris Oxford.Chris Oxford (talk) 23:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Category:7th-century men has been nominated for discussion
Category:7th-century men, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jeanette Fitzsimons into Electoral system of New Zealand. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment on source of paragraph added to article. Hugo999 (talk) 03:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Reversion explained
Just to let you know that I partially reverted this edit of yours: this was an election to the Delaware Senate, the upper house of the state legislature, not the U.S. Senate. But otherwise thanks for creating the state-level elections category. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Category:Parks in Saint Helena has been nominated for discussion
Category:Parks in Saint Helena, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1429 in the Ottoman Empire
A tag has been placed on Category:1429 in the Ottoman Empire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1430 in the Byzantine Empire
A tag has been placed on Category:1430 in the Byzantine Empire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Motorised Infantry divisions of Italy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 21:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Idaho elections, 1912
A tag has been placed on Category:Idaho elections, 1912 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 13:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1890 in Poland
A tag has been placed on Category:1890 in Poland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Takapu Valley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable 'suburb' consisting of a single rural road.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I wrote an article on Takapu Road which is one of the official suburbs of Wellington City, as you can see from the template at the bottom of the article (though like Makara Beach which is somewhat larger, it has only a small population on one road). Hence I think they each deserve their own article. Hugo999 (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:220 BC in Europe
A tag has been placed on Category:220 BC in Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Category:9th-century Ukrainian people has been nominated for discussion
Category:9th-century Ukrainian people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melrose, New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berhampore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1870 in New Zealand
- added a link pointing to James Stuart-Wortley
- 1903 in New Zealand
- added a link pointing to William Travers
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)