User talk:Hugo999/Archive 8
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films set in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Under the Southern Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nelson railway proposals may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- and Gowanbridge and to continue it on to Murchison, no further work was undertaken beyond Glenhope.]].{{sfn|Churchman & Hurst|1990 or 2001|Chapter 13 or 12}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University of Canterbury may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * { Canterbury (1885 article)]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Guthrie Wilson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-WH2-2Ita-c8-2.html Action on the Senio, 1945 (from the official war history ''Italy Vol II'' pp 365-7]
- *[http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-WH2-25Ba-b3.html Honours and Awards (from the official war history ''25th Battalion'' p639 ]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Beatles' 1964 world tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Six days that changed the world, February 1964'' by editors A. Aurichio & D. Melamud, (2014, Rizzoli, New York USA ISBN 978084784 1059 (Photos of the Beatles first American tour)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marilyn Duckworth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *''[[Close to Home (1975 TV series)|Close to Home]]'' scripts (5 for [[TV One (New Zealand)|Television One]] in 1975–1976.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Category:KS Vllaznia Shkodër seasons
Category:KS Vllaznia Shkodër seasons, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Koppapa (talk) 10:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this may be of interest to you. Bogger (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2011 World Senior Curling Championships – Women's tournament may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Category:[[Category:Women's curling competitions in the United States]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Bermudian elections
Just an FYI, I'm going to undo your category changes from "XXXX elections in North America" to "XXXX elections in the Caribbean" as Berumda isn't in the Caribbean! Cheers, Number 57 13:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Heritage canal locks etc
Hi, I noticed your addition of Category:Grade II listed canals to Bath Locks and have added a few more from List of locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal to the relevant cats; however can you advise what to do about Monkey Marsh Lock which is not listed but is an ancient monument and I can't see a relevant category for that?— Rod talk 13:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Try Category:Scheduled Monuments in England which has Scheduled Ancient Monuments by county, though here “ancient” does not mean “pre-fifth century”! And by county only, not by function Hugo999 (talk) 22:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Your edit to Wittaya Subphayuth
Hi. I'm guessing this edit was an error. I've reverted it. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Emily Grierson
- added a link pointing to Berkley
- Gavin Stevens (Faulkner character)
- added a link pointing to Berkley
- Ikkemotubbe
- added a link pointing to Berkley
- Louis Grenier
- added a link pointing to Berkley
- Thomas Sutpen
- added a link pointing to Berkley
- William Faulkner bibliography
- added a link pointing to Berkley
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Wikimedia genealogy project
Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to this discussion. And apologies if I have made this request before. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Well I will have a look, first I have heard of it. Hugo999 (talk) 03:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Global account
Hi Hugo999! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hm
I don't know that I'd agree with this edit, since it was entirely a re-creation, made on a rooftop in Philadelphia. DS (talk) 18:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, not a doco! Hugo999 (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Referendums
Hi Hugo. Could you please stop adding referendums to "Elections in X" categories? Thanks, Number 57 10:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:Medieval Greek astrologers
Category:Medieval Greek astrologers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine ✍ 11:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK for James C. Marshall
On 4 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James C. Marshall, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that James C. Marshall was the first Chief Engineer of the Manhattan District? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James C. Marshall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Categorisation policy for churches
Hello Hugo999, I have a question that I cannot find an answer to on any of the Wikipedia Manual of Style pages and considering your fantastic work on categorising Church-based articles, thought you might know. Is there a policy on how articles on churches are to be sorted in category pages?
For example, if an article was called, St John Church, London, would it be sorted as: London, St John Church, or John Church, London, or London, John Church or just remain as it is? Up to now I had always thought that, in most categories, e.g. listed churches, it would be: London, St John Church - just from looking at how most of the categories were already sorted.
Sorry to be a pedant about this, but a new user has come along and has sorted a lot of church-based articles to: John Church, London, and now I not sure what is the right way. I hope there is a policy which clears this up and I can point in the user's direction. Happy editing, Pjposullivan (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
No, unfortunately I don’t know of any rules or guidelines for sorting church names. Using Hotcat I left the article sort by name as they were previously, as you say there is not one method used. I did alter 14th -century architecture (say) to 14th-century church buildings; and add some county categories by denomination where missin; eg CofE or RC churches in Fooshire’ Hugo999 (talk) 04:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- That's ok, cheers, I'll keep an eye for a policy. Happy editing, Pjposullivan (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
About your (non)participation in the January 2012 SOPA vote
Hi Hugo999. I am Piotr Konieczny (User:Piotrus), you may know me as an active content creator (see my userpage), but I am also a professional researcher of Wikipedia. Recently I published a paper (downloadable here) on reasons editors participated in Wikipedia's biggest vote to date (January 2012 WP:SOPA). I am now developing a supplementary paper, which analyzes why many editors did not take part in that vote. Which is where you come in :) You are a highly active Wikipedian (39th to be exact), and you were active back during the January 2012 discussion/voting for the SOPA, yet you did not chose to participate in said vote. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me why was that so? For your convenience, I prepared a short survey at meta, which should not take more than a minute of your time. I would dearly appreciate you taking this minute; not only as a Wikipedia researcher but as a fellow content creator and concerned member of the community (I believe your answers may help us eventually improve our policies and thus, the project's governance). PS. If you chose to reply here (on your userpage), please WP:ECHO me. Thank you! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Truck art in Pakistan
An article that you have been involved in editing, Truck art in Pakistan, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. wia (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Just a quick question about this category. All the articles you've sorted into it don't really fit as "proposed" - they're in the final stages of construction, to open on March 28. Is there a better category for this, or does Wikipedia use "proposed" until the infrastructure actually opens? (My categorization work is mostly limited to Commons). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Well I don't think there is any category for "under construction" particularly at the country and country subdivision (state) level Hugo999 (talk) 20:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Rename
- Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Water in America to Category:Water in South America and Category:Droughts in America to Category:Droughts in North America Hugo999 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Suggest maintain both categories because are more general. There are the same categories for Africa, Europea, Asia and so on. Also, in both categories are article from both parts of America, North and South. You can create subcategories for Category:Water in South America within Category:Water in America and for Category:Droughts in North America within Category:Droughts in America. --Lagoset (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- I don’t see any need for an intermediate category for XXX in the Americas as these category trees would differ from all the other ones which don’t have such a category, and which would also complivate the subcategories for Central America and the Caribbean, which are subcategories of North America. Hugo999 (talk) 10:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- It depends on the continent concept. Some people think that America is a continent, other ones think that are two (in a similar way to other parts of the Earth). So, you can create / use / delete the best for you. I thought America was broader and categories must begin with the broader concept.--Lagoset (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have just seen Category:Water in the Americas. This is a good solution. A big t-h-a-n-k you.--Lagoset (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- It depends on the continent concept. Some people think that America is a continent, other ones think that are two (in a similar way to other parts of the Earth). So, you can create / use / delete the best for you. I thought America was broader and categories must begin with the broader concept.--Lagoset (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Trams and rail
I see you like / worked in electric trams and rail. I also like this topics. Do you know if renewable electricity is mainstreamly used for them in your area?. Thanks in advance.--Lagoset (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there: Wellington New Zealand has an extensive electric suburban rail network on four lines north, with electric power largely renewable from hydroelectricity, plus some geothermal and more recently wind power. Only the rail link to the Wairarapa (and freight trains) are diesel-powered. But public transport in the central city, south and some northern suburbs is by bus, mainly diesel. There are electric trolley buses to some suburbs (they replaced electric trams in 1964) and the Regional Council (which is responsible for public transport in the region) wants to replace them with diesel buses as the power feeder network is due for replacement. Then supposedly by battery-electric buses, although with the weight of batteries they would be rather a liability on some of the hill routes. PS: when I first went to secondary school it was on an open-top double-deck tram. Hugo999 (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 13:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Category:Road transport in the Caribbean
Category:Road transport in the Caribbean, which you created, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Road transportation in North America. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prentice Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roane County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Football leagues in Asia, Africa by season
Re Re the category Category:Football leagues in Asia by season , what format should they be? Either Category: 2008–09 Asian association football leagues or Category: 1934–35 Asian domestic association football leagues. Either OK to me, perhaps the latter, but they should be the same throughout the main category. I was creating some more, and then noticed the variation between seasons.
- Difficult to know which title is best, should be shortest possible I think. Category titles can get a little longwinded. I would favour something like "20xx-xx in Asian football leagues" Djln --Djln (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cekli & Djin: Re the category Category:Football leagues in Asia by season , what format should they be? At present both Category: 2008–09 Asian association football leagues and Category: 1934–35 Asian domestic association football leagues. Either OK to me, perhaps the latter, but they should be the same throughout the main category. I was creating some more, and then noticed the variation between seasons. Yes, I favour shorter category titles and "domestic" seems unnessary for the Asian, African and European league subcategories, though perhaps in line with the European categories how about retaining “association and having and "20xx-xx in African association football leagues". and "20xx-xx in Asian association football leagues". This would mean changing the African categories to omit “domestic” and adding "in" to all the Asian categories. plus removing “domestic” to the earlier ones. Could be done by speedy renaming or just the author deleting the categories that each of us have created? Hugo999 (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am good with getting rid of "domestic" and "in" as outlined above. If someone knows how to arrange a speedy renaming that would be helpful Djln --Djln (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Will arrange speedy renaming to take out "domestic" and add "in" shortly Hugo999 (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Now all up for speedy renaming Hugo999 (talk) 04:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Asian football
Hi Hugo, what's your opinion on "20xx in Asian football" verses "200x-x0 in Asian football". Should be one or the other I think, but not both. Asian Champions League is played in a calendar year but lots of domestic Asian leagues seems are played in 200x-x0 format. Djln --Djln (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Inclined to agree for all ie Asian, African and European seasons to be in either "20xx in Asian football" or "20xx-yy in Asian football" depending on what that country uses; with the overall category "20xx-yy in Asian football" as a subcategory of the consecutive categories "20xx in Asian football" and "20yy in Asian football". But I may have copied some country categories with both categories without checking. Hugo999 (talk) 02:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Categorisation
You might want to slow down a bit. Creating large numbers of categories that contain only one article (and have little chance of containing any more than one or two articles) is not good practice. See WP:SMALLCAT for guidance. Sionk (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
New Zealand general election, 1987
Long time no speak; I hope you are well. This edit caught my attention, as it's unusual for a 1986 book to provide a reference for the 1987 election. Hence, I got the book in question off the shelf and what it does say on page 371 is that Kynoch was the unsuccessful Hastings candidate in the 1981 election. Did you by chance add the info to the wrong results template? Schwede66 09:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, should have been 1981! Yes, OK thanks Hugo999 (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Category:Historic trails and roads in Turkey
Category:Historic trails and roads in Turkey, which you created, has been nominated for merging into Category:Roman roads in Turkey. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:13th century in Ethiopia
Category:13th century in Ethiopia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Max Cryer
Hi Hugo 999.
As you created this page back in 2008, you may be interested in the edits by someone claiming to be Max Cryer. Seems to be mainly deleting sourced content. See here. I have restored the Bio details which they almost totally deleted and 'person data'. A full reversion may be in order. 220 of Borg 04:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Well I should look at the original sources re his early life Hugo999 (talk) 06:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:Years of the 21st century in Zanzibar
Category:Years of the 21st century in Zanzibar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Category:High schools in Thailand
Category:High schools in Thailand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Bots
You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.
What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.
This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.
If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!
- The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
- Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.
Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.
Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.
Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Your attention
Your notification of re-naming is admirable, and my apologies for being slack in responding.
Thanks for your continued efforts in an area of wikipedia few seem interested in - your edits are appreciated. my comments were in the main wrong about the various labels of buddhism, so have moved the comments. Please keep at it! JarrahTree 01:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I am working on the Russian version "Burnside High School" article, which currently has short history section in wikipedia. I am writing you to ask - is there a possibility for you to visit a National Library at Welligton and obtain an electronic copy of book "Choosing the right path : Burnside High School 1960-2010 / Paul O'Connor" (http://natlib.govt.nz/records/21643829), and put some information into the article? Also I can buy a hard copy of that book. Could you give me an advice, if it's possible? I'll be happy to get any version and any part of that book. Thank you for your time, --Voyagerim (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Voyagerim: Will look at the book next Friday at the copy in the National Library, Wellington. Published c2009 according to the listing (despite having 2010 in the title!) probably by a Christchurch bookshop so do not know whether copies would be avaliable now. Likewise re the earlier c1985 book/booklet about the school. PS: The English Wikipedia article seems fairly comprehensive, did you want more details? curious why a Christchurch high (secondary) school has an article on the Russian Wikipedia! Hugo999 (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well I don't think an electronic version is avaliable (though the NZ National Library has many magazines avaliable electronically), but what were you after. John Key was at Burnside High from 1975 to 1979. Hugo999 (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Hugo999. Some time ago I created this category, and recently you created Category:Australian real estate businesspeople, which I would think encompasses my category and is better. Can you see any reason why I should not roll them over into yours? Doug butler (talk) 22:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Possibly no as the category Category:Australian real estate agents is not part of a category by nationality with other nationalities, and the category Category:Australian real estate businesspeople is broader. But there are American and Canadian subcategories in Category:Realtors; and categories for Category:Real estate brokers and Category:Estate agents (people) (which seems to be largely but not entirely British). How about separate categories Category:British real estate agents (new) and Category:Australian real estate agents as subcategories with American and Canadian realtors of Category:Realtors and real estate agents by country/nationality (ie retaining local usage of either realtors or real estate agents). People in the category Category:Real estate brokers could be absorbed into one of these categories; for Americans either Category:American real estate businesspeople (mostly) or Category:American realtors. I could write a proposal for “Categories for discussion” along those lines. NB: The New Zealand Yellow Pages category is “Real estate agents and consultants” though not enough to have a NZ Wikipedia category. For companies there is Category:Real estate companies by country. Hugo999 (talk) 23:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- I would think the one category (Real estate businesspeople) is plenty, and as you say, is used internationally. Doug butler (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- The category now has zero members. Can I take advantage of your kind offer to have it removed. Doug butler (talk) 11:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well I will schedule it! Hugo999 (talk) 12:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Edit on Gun-type nuclear weapon
I was wondering if you had a source that contradicted that the Soviet Union had not built a gun-type bomb. Your edit here seems to indicate that you feel they did? Or was that a copyedit? Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Re my edit that the Soviets like Britain never built a gun-type atomic bomb, the first Soviet Joe-1 of 1949 was a plutonium implosion bomb (possibly from Groves, will check), though it may be difficult to prove that the Soviets NEVER built a gun-type bomb. The US did have some gun-type uranium bombs apart from the artillery weapons, they were "bunker-buster" bombs which had to penetrate the ground. See Mark 8 nuclear bomb and Mark 11 nuclear bomb Hugo999 (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)