Deleting sourced materilal; please discuss contentious material on articles talk page edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomara dynasty. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Re Packer&Tracker (talk ♀) 00:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tomara dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 08:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tomar clan. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 08:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)   Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gypsy (Rajput clan), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Uncle Spock (talk) 04:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for removing the maintenance template from the page without resolving the problem or providing a valid reason in the edit summary. I understand the importance of these templates in ensuring the accuracy and quality of content on Wikipedia. In the future, I will make sure to address the issue before removing any maintenance templates. Thank you for your contributions in maintaining the integrity of the site. Hanshingling (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rathore clan, you may be blocked from editing. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 16:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello Hanshingling and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Re Packer&Tracker (talk ♀) 00:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


General sanctions edit

 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Re Packer&Tracker (talk ♀) 01:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Awana clan. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Again, at Battar - senagent is a very clearyl marked copy of material from here. Please carefully evalluate your sources.Sam Kuru (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that my response may have caused. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and reliable information, and I take plagiarism very seriously. I will make sure to review my sources carefully and ensure that all content provided is properly attributed in the future. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to address your concerns. Hanshingling (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of Gurjar clans edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Gurjar clans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Hanshingling! Your additions to Gypsy (Rajput clan) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uncle Spock (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Also, you should improve previous articles about same topic instead of copying content from it to create new ones. Sutyarashi (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Administrators noticeboard edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 16:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's always important to communicate in a respectful and polite manner to avoid hurting someone's feelings. Thank you for acknowledging that and expressing your concern. It's important to remember that our words and actions can have an impact on others, so it's crucial to be mindful of how we communicate with those around us. Let's continue to prioritize kindness and empathy in our interactions. Hanshingling (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Creating a positive work environment is essential for promoting productivity and fostering healthy relationships between colleagues. Therefore, it's important to be mindful of our words and actions and ensure that we don't try to hurt anyone's feelings or disturb the good vibe of the workplace. By showing respect and empathy towards our colleagues, we can create a comfortable and supportive work environment that promotes teamwork and collaboration. Let's all strive to treat each other with kindness and consideration, and work towards building a positive and inclusive workplace culture. Hanshingling (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hanshingling, I would consider unblocking you if you could address all the warnings you have previously received and ignored, and your claim to be "an AI language model". But posting non-sequitur messages that are apparently composed by LLMs is not going to help your cause. Abecedare (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am afraid Abecedare that they have any chance to make a comeback now. Please take a look here as well, they are socking to bypass their block - BonzonEllite (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 03:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Packer&Tracker: Blocked the new duck account. If new socks appear (as I expect), an SPI may be needed to keep track and possibly run a CU. Abecedare (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bhadanakas Kingdom edit

Hello, Hanshingling

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JML1148, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Bhadanakas Kingdom, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JML1148}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rathore clan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rathore clan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rathore clan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gypsy (Rajput clan) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gypsy (Rajput clan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy (Rajput clan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uncle Spock (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 04:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chechi clan edit

 

The article Chechi clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by an AILM. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gorsi clan edit

 

The article Gorsi clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by an AILM. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Meelu clan edit

 

The article Meelu clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by an AILM. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Poruswal clan edit

 

The article Poruswal clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by an AILM. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gorsi clan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorsi clan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorsi clan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 12:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 16:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Chavda clan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Chavda clan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battar moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Battar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Maitrak moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Maitrak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hun clan edit

 

The article Hun clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

created by sock

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhakkar clan (May 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DreamRimmer (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hanshingling! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DreamRimmer (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Nekadi edit

  Hello, Hanshingling. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nekadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Dhakkar clan edit

  Hello, Hanshingling. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhakkar clan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Chandel (Gurjar clan) edit

  Hello, Hanshingling. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chandel (Gurjar clan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dhakkar clan edit

 

Hello, Hanshingling. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dhakkar clan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chandel (Gurjar clan) edit

 

Hello, Hanshingling. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chandel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply