Speedy Deletion Follow Up edit

This is not a banned or blocked account. It is not my fault other family members can not use Wikipedia properly. I thought I was editing an archived page, so I changed the deletion tag to db-author. --WebCite (talk) 01:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pron.wav edit

 

Wikipedia suck and manage by idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me2tanveer (talkcontribs) 08:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on File:Pron.wav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:36, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 

The page Sl1pg8r should not be speedy deleted because... edit

It clearly states a YouTuber and how he is unique, and has clear references on different topics. It shouldn't be deleted, because it is also just like any of the other pages on YouTubers, with clear information on their life, occupation, and details. All sources are fully reliable and directly taken from the youtuber's pages. --Tyvic (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Per Holknekt edit

Please take a look at the article Per Holknekt that I have created. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could you please take a look at the external links for Linda Norgrove, Teresa Lewis and Catrine da Costa. All three will appear on DYK in the next coming months. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:LCHS 30204 Front.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:LCHS 30204 Front.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please edit

..take a look at the refs for the article Murder of Gerd Johansson. Appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Oba Chandler edit

Hi, could anything be done with the four deadlinks at the Oba Chandler article detected today? :) If so any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits edit

You seem to label all your edits as "Minor edits", but most of them don't come within the narrow range which is supposed to be called this - see Help:Minor edit. Please don't label anything as a minor edit unless it really is. As just the most recent example, adding a new ref is not minor. Thanks. PamD 13:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Georgy Chernov edit

Hello, I don't know if you've seen that this unref article has been tagged for notability. It would help if it had refs and a link to the Russian article, which I couldn't find. At the moment, it risks deletion, but it looks like it might need work more than anything. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also please confirm which name should be used - article title and unsourced text don't match! PamD 16:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have an english reference with Georgy at "Explorers of Pechora Resources". Retrieved 27 February 2016. proven through the efforts of the famous geologist Georgy CHERNOV. and here "Vorkuta: Recovering from its past". Retrieved 27 February 2016. but these could be machine translations. Maybe some russian speaker could establish a correct name. Another editor changed Georgy to George. Cotton2 (talk) 16:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Actually a machine translation of the russian article here gives the article title of Georgy Chernov and actual name as George in english. Which is correct translation?Cotton2 (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 28 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georgy Chernov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Gordon State College Seal (Georgia).jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gordon State College Seal (Georgia).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

.

Okon Fuoko edit

Thanks, Cotton2, for taking a look at Okon Fuoko. I am still in the process of working on the article (as well as several others simultaneously for this composer); I'm not a beginner, so rest assured that these articles will be up to snuff shortly. I have multiple sources for each article and am in the process of getting them in order as we speak. I just don't prefer to work in my sandbox anymore and so I work step-by-step in the mainspace. Happy editing!  :) Sgvrfjs (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Durgapur Institute of Advanced Technology and Management edit

Your tagging of this article for deletion, and de-tagging (correct, A7 doesn't apply to schools), meant that the article was marked as patrolled without any further critique (which it badly needs). Please take care on WP:NPP. for (;;) (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Stoney (album) edit

I believe Stoney (album) to be a valid redirect search term, for which {{PROD}} should not be applied twice. You may take the issue to WP:AFD if you so choose. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Deletion and Articles for Deletion edit

Proposed deletion is for uncontroversial deletion. An editor may remove the PROD tag for any reason. Once it is removed, it should not be restored. You made a mistake in applying the tag twice. The deletion is no longer uncontroversial. You may nominate the article for Articles for Deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol edit

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete Amit Lal. Saying someone is a professor in a university is na indication ofplausible importance. Notability, of course, is a hgiher standard, and Lal meets it-- holding a namerd chair in a major university fulfill WP:PROF, even if nothing more is said.
I also did not delete Jitesh Pillai -- the editor of a notable magazine also is a clear indication of possible significance, and in this case is very likely notable.
I also did not delete Untitled Ram Potheneni movie -- I do not see any promotionalism--it a straightforward description. It probably is notable, but may end up being deleted because of WP:CRYSTAL
neither is Badiya particularly promotional--I think the problem is notability, but it may not fit any speedy category.
Ochsenwang. should have been marked for Speedy G7, not A3, because when the author blanks the page it indicates he wants it deleted; it is necessary to look atthe edit history as welll as the article.
Art in America (band) indicates possible importance because of recordings that charted--it maya be notable, if better sources can be found.
Eric Gauthier (dancer) was a soloist in major company, so certainly shows significance and probably notable
see my note on the talk p. of Giovanni Saziari--there is no contradiction.
Say So is not A7, not when it has a WDJS ref.

Remember: an indication of significance is just an indication that there's a good faith reason why someonem ight think a WP article possible--it is deliberately a much lower bar than actual notability. You need to review WP:Deletion policy, WP:CSD, and all the detailed parts of WP:N

You are also working much too rapidly. Nobody can properly review new articles at the rate of one a minute, or keep it up accurately for several hours. I've been doing this for 8 years now, almost every day. and I never try to do more than 10 or so at a time, because I know that if i do more, I become less accurate. It is extremely important not to incorrectly mark for deletion the articles of new editors, because if the article is even marked for deletion, they usually never come back to WP.

No matter how many articles are in the page list to be reviewed, it is not helpful to do an incorrect or inadequate review.

Please do not review further new pages until you have some more experience. The best way to learn the criteria is to participate in discussions at WP:AFD -- after you have read the pages I listed above, and the instructions for AfD. And when you are ready, start very slowly. DGG ( talk ) 18:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Simply a note also that Howard Schneider was reviewed despite it has a maintenance deletion template, and no contents, this is because a user removed it; I have fixed it now but this should've been restored again, not kept with its tagged state. SwisterTwister talk 18:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Port Gaverne.jpg edit

Hi. Just wanted to let you know that after a file is moved to Commons, it enters the queue for F8 speedy deletion and there's no need to list it at FFD. All the best, Miniapolis 13:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Badiya edit

Hey. I don't write info in Wikipedia, I just translate them. That's how it was written in Arabic. If you think it is promotional, then I suggest you also delete the Arabic page. However, I don't really thing it is advertising the game. Well, you're the boss.

Edit: Also, I think this is all the info anyone can gather on the game. The game is still in development, and the company hasn't revealed any in-depth info about it, like the plot. So yeah, do what you see necessary.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcellus Drum (talkcontribs) 13:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Twixx31 edit

Hey Cotton2, I notice that you want delete a page that I create . This page is for a boxer from Algeria you can watch his match against the Brazilian boxer De Jesus . Twixx31 (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Twixx31 edit

Hey cotton2 I think that I add References Twixx31 (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Trenten Beram edit

Hi Cotton!

I made many adjustments, corrections, additions including cited references and Category links. Let me know if any other improvements are needed. Much appreciation for your help!

Thenygman Thenygman (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

adding references to page donna ruko edit

added references - please review thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dermot100 (talkcontribs) 16:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Cotton2! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:44, Wednesday, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Knut Folkert edit

Hello, please read the talk of this article. I tried to create Knut Folkerts, but it did not work because the redirecht to RAF Thanks.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 06:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reverted merge proposal edit

Hi Cotton2. I just saw your merge proposal at Maulana. I have reverted it as Maulana is a generic term (like "Priest" or "Rabbi") and it doesn't refer to one specific person. As such, this is not a viable merge target. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Scandal edit

You may go ahead and do so. I have already created the intended page which is Scandal! .. I may need some guidance at this seeing as you're clearly good at it. I want to create subheadings just like those big American series and add pictures so it is appealing and interesting to readers who may come upon it. Would appreciate any guidance at this stage. Odwann (talk) 11:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

otomarket edit

hi cotton2 i have created the page otomarket and i have given its importance and i am adding it more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashant sadhanu (talkcontribs) 12:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Declined speedy edit

  Hi Cotton2. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Vasco da Gama (council speaker), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, under criterion A3 because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. A short sentence identifying a person as "a new elected speaker of City Johannesburg" on a particular date is not the "no content whatsoever" that merits deletion under A3. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! --McGeddon (talk) 14:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of OMA Akatugba edit

I put forward that the page of Oma Akatugba should not be deleted. Reason being that the subject is very notable. Also, I need some time to work on it. Thank you Kelvinsage1 (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Kelvinsage1 (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC) how can you help with improving the article so that it doeasnt get deleted. Kelvinsage1 (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why so eager to delete my page within 1 minute of its creating? edit

I am just getting started on this article. I'm afraid one minute was not sufficient time for me to finish the article. This will be a very long article that will take a very long time create, edit and cite. I have prepared the section titles already, to guide me and other contributors in our work, but I will likely only finish the introduction today. If you insist on each section having some content, I could contribute at least a sentence to each section today, but I would only be doing so to satisfy the arbitrary wishes of other editors, when the Wikipedia community would not be harmed in any way by there being a few days delay before the sections are filled in. There are volumes of scholarly references that pertain to the material that each of these section will discuss, so please just give me a week or so to prepare the article with the appropriate information. This is a very important topic that has not yet been discussed on Wikipedia. The survival of freedom and democracy may depend on the careful consideration and discussion of the relationship between tyranny and arms control, and on the public's education regarding this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The wiki authority (talkcontribs) 18:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jan Jacobsz. Schipper edit

Hi Cotton2, I've added a link to the article so it should no longer be an orphan. The link is on Ariana Nozeman. There is also now a link on the project page this was part of. Could you kindly have a look? Thanks! Bahsheep (talk) 12:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Loop Mania edit

Hey. Heard your suggestion and I agree. I'll delete the App Store refs, but I'll keep the YouTube because it announces the game. This is the only ref that contains any sort of announcement to the game. Let me know if its bad. sheldon.andre (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lumbini Engineering College edit

I have declined your speedy deletion request at Lumbini Engineering College, as I see no reason to think it is a test page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Najmuddin Bammat edit

I have deleted Najmuddin Bammat, but under a different criterion - WP:A3, "No content" was the appropriate one rather than WP:G2 "Test pages" (though for A1 and A3 it is customary to wait 20 minutes or so to give the creator time to add content). I should point out that WP:G2 is not just a catch-all for "any other reason", it is specifically for pages that show evidence of only having been created for test purposes. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Message from User:Piyalighosh edit

Sorry. This was a mistake. Thank you for notifying me. Further I always be[[Link title]] aware of it. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piyalighosh (talkcontribs) 09:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy Deletion of Sandbox? edit

Hello. Tonight I have created several sandbox pages to work on edits, and keep getting VERY prompt deletion notices. I thought a sandbox was for just this type of thing. What am I doing wrong? RobP (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the transfer... Can you explain how I go about creating a sandbox page Rp2006/sandbox/xyz differently so as to directly create it in my user space? RobP (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sure put User: in front of Rp2006/sandbox/xyz e.g. User:Rp2006/sandbox/xyz Cotton2 (talk) 01:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Multiple speedies edit

Heya  :) Saw on 7even Dīnosaurs where you'd used the db-multiple on the existing speedy I'd placed. It doesn't work correctly with text versions (like db-band) of the tag, you have to use the numerical versions. You generally also can't add content, like your "chat" comment, other than links on a copyvio notice. So the proper format is (brackets)db-multiple|a3|g1(brackets. See this revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7even_D%C4%ABnosaurs&oldid=737824671 vs this revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7even_D%C4%ABnosaurs&oldid=737825387 to see what I mean. Hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Cotton2. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Cloudmounter for deletion edit

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DashaG11 (talkcontribs) 11:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for Sega 3D Classics Collection edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing—Sega 3D Classics Collection—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jotamide (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Broken Lines edit

Hi. I've declined your speedy as the article does not pass A9. This is a double criterion - the record must be non-notable, AND the band/artiste must not have an article. I'm not saying anything about the notability of the record, but the band does have an article (and I'm not commenting about that either...). Peridon (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com edit

Criteria for speedy deletion "does not include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, mergeable material." [1]

@MordeKyle: Some notice, such as "It has been suggested that this section be split out into another page. (Discuss)" would have prevented the CSD, at iRacing.com. It's available as 2 curly bracket Split section 2 curly brackets. I've completed the review on the list. Cotton2 (talk) 21:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Agreed the article is not suitable for wikipedia. It's just a random list of cars which were coincidentally used in an old videogame. This has been indicated to the editor, who keeps re-adding it.

~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.226.49.230 (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

Oma Akatugba edit

I don't know if you had noticed, but this was placed on your userpage instead of your talk page. As such, I reverted it and moved it here if you want to tackle it. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati) 20:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@ZappaOMati: Thank you, no I didn't know it was on my userpage. I did remove a lot of puffery from the article, but not much help with sources. If he is well known in Africa, it's probably in their national newspapers, maybe not online. I don't have access to that. It's been resubmitted for AFC, a few days before we'll know again. Cotton2 (talk) 20:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

hello, my article has been deleted. However id like to put it back on and make it wikipedia worthy. please can you help ,e with that?. id really appreciate the assistance. Thanks. the page that was deleted is Oma Akatugba.

I need help with creating an article, can you help me out?Kelvinsage1 (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright on Aes hordearium, and aes equestre, edit

While the source is from http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/Aes_Equestre.html, the copyright in his page says that one * means it is public domain[1], and the source of it is a book from 1875, as such it is not copyright violation. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Thanks for reviewing Pen pineapple apple pen, Cotton2.

Unfortunately NgYShung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This article doesn't seems good on fitting with Wikipedia (for now). Un-reviewing this for others' experienced reviewers to review this.

To reply, leave a comment on NgYShung's talk page.

@NgYShung: Great, I tagged it with a CSD A7 but it was removed somewhere along the line. I agree then that it should never have been accepted. Cotton2 (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

OhBoy! edit

Hi, I have declined your CSD A7 nomination of this article as WP:INHERITED is not part of the CSD criteria. You may wish to file a PROD or AfD instead. I have also noticed this is not the first time your NPP work has been criticised, and you have not responded to some users asking why their articles have been deleted. If I see a continuation of this behaviour, you may need to be blocked from editing. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Ritchie333: Your a little vague on which articles I have not responded to why they were nominated for deletion, as I don't delete any articles. If it's what you read on my talk page, you haven't dug deeply enough. Aes hordearium, and aes equestre, I reverted the CSD and was thanked. Also the articles needed public domain attribution, which I just learned about. Another editor took care of that. List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com, had no indication, either on split page or main page, that it was indeed split. It appeared in NPP as an independent article. I suggest you check User talk:MordeKyle to see how that worked out. Cotton2 (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You are well rounded! Vexillographer (talk) 22:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Cotton2 (talk) 23:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:WebCite edit

You indicated this may be a blocked/banned user. Can you give me an indication of who you think the master account is? —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@C.Fred: Sorry, my error. I misread in his history about blocking behavior, realized my error and removed message from his talk page. He text me that it wasn't him doing it, but family using his account. I was going to tell him that wasn't allowed but got sidetracked in meatspace. I'll leave that to you, if you like. Cotton2 (talk) 02:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

User talk:MissKnowledge edit

Actually it was copyvio within Wikipedia, copied from Lion Capital of Ashoka. I'll tell her. Doug Weller talk 07:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

FFU edit

Thank you for helping out at FFU. A few things though, please formally close requests and remove the do not archive tag at the top of each section so the bot will take care of it. Also, please don't upload static images as .gifs in the future. PNG or SVG is the preferred format for those types of things. Also, the various non-free use items have specific rationales that should be used. For logos that is {{non-free use rationale logo}}. In regards to the reliance logo that you asked for a license on, that is {{PD-textlogo}}. If they don't give a license but one can be gleaned from the image (usually logos) you don't need to ask for one. If you have any questions about this please let me know. --Majora (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Raley Supermarket logo.svg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Raley Supermarket logo.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Confused edit

Hey mate, you reverted all the changes i made to the page Leap Training, not really sure why? the company rebranded to a new name i just updated the information as the when you search the new name on google the wikipedia page still comes up with the old name as you wont let me update it. AlffieHQ (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@AlffieHQ: Hi, I have reverted the changes and moved the article to Alffie. As a side note, your username is not in policy guidelines and you should request that it be changed. Each employee needs an individual account. G'day mate, Cotton2 (talk) 21:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Cotton2: Perfect thanks for all your help! Name has also been changed! Cheers Fatcatinahat (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Reliance Insurance logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Reliance Insurance logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mawangdui is a palce, which it is famous because of the Han toms's discovery. in fact, the place Mawangdui is a subdivison, not tombs. I'm editting the title Mawangdui. thanks. cncs (talk) 14:42 October 20 2016 (utc)

Systemic Biomolecular Interdependent-Indeterminacy Speedy Deletion Appeal edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I feel like this is a relevant field, especially concerning today's computing advancements. I am actively seeking out new sources and expanding the page, but as I have other work to do, I must leave it as a stub for now. I can assure you, however, that this is not vandalism, and is purely professional. In addition, this is complex material, and will take me significant time to synthesize into a more understandable format for this website. My main goal is to promote awareness of a new and developing field of research that I believe is important in tomorrow's technology. Please understand more edits will come in time. -SimicChemist — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimicChemist (talkcontribs) 04:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Surnames--it makes more sense to speak of origins (first historical references/records) edit

I have started the talk page for the article. Please respond there so we can fix the anonymous changes that removed reference to the surname's Sephardi Jewish connection and arbitrarily added reference to one of many countries where the surname can be found. Mglxyz (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Philip Yenyo Edit edit

Well, I'm the source. Dolores is my mother, her name is not spelled how you keep editing it. Roda25 (talk) 12:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Haydon Manning (new editor and possible CoI candidate) edit

Hi Cotton2, thanks for your recent revert on the article Haydon Manning. It appears that User:Willow2009 is a new user, unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. Given the nature of his/her deletions and additions made today, exclusive to the one article, I would guess that it is quite likely that the editor is closely related to the subject of the article, and may have a WP:COI. What is the best action to take in such an instance? It seems that the author didn't understand/value your revert and needs some pointers to relevant policies in the very least. --Danimations (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Danimations: I posted a Welcome message on Willow2009's talk page with that information. Now I have posted 2nd level warnings also. An entry on the article talk page toward a consensus is probably needed too. You want to get that started? It is required before strong action can be taken. Cotton2 (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply