User talk:Cloudchased/Archive

Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 23 July 2014

December 2013 edit

Your GA nomination of 1804 Snow hurricane edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1804 Snow hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 06:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1804 Snow hurricane edit

The article 1804 Snow hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1804 Snow hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 23:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! edit

Hello Cloudchased, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

Disambiguation link notification for January 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1846 Havana hurricane, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dansville, New York and Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1999 North Indian Ocean cyclone season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 5 without making landfall.<ref>http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/atcr/1999atcr.pdf}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)   Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hurricane Erin (2001) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.Reply

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • cancelled several flights in and out of the [[Bermuda International Airport]],<ref name="cnn">{{cite news|author=Associated Press|year=2001|title=Weakening Hurricane Erin spawns strong waves

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 2 January edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1846 Havana hurricane edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1846 Havana hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Official "Filli Vanilli" Press Release edit

"When a member of the singing group, the Ponytones, has to drop out of an important performance, Fluttershy takes drastic measures to ensure that the show goes on." There is no mention in the Hub Network's press release stating that Fluttershy joins the Ponytones after one of the members dropping out. - Asaraullo05

Namu edit

It looks like Namu is going to be one of those systems in which we dont properly know the death toll but to help with this i set up the following sandbox last year to try and get a better figure together based on relaible sources.Jason Rees (talk) 17:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter edit

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer   Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re: 1846 Havana hurricane/GA1 edit

Let me know towards the end of the round if you still haven't got a reviewer for this and I'll take a look at it so you don't lose the points for this round. Miyagawa (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Cape Flattery (Queensland)) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Cape Flattery (Queensland), Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Silkwood, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Silkwood, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Minnamoolka, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Minnamoolka, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Cardstone, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Cardstone, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Cowley Beach, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Cowley Beach, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Woopen Creek, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Woopen Creek, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Miriwinni, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Miriwinni, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (East Russell, Queensland) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating East Russell, Queensland, Cloudchased!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The Signpost: 12 February 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of 1846 Havana hurricane edit

The article 1846 Havana hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1846 Havana hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cyclone Winifred edit

  Hello! Your submission of Cyclone Winifred at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Ohc ¡digame! 03:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Ohconfucius: maybe you could poke Hurricanehink about this as well. Cloudchased (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I thought you might be the one because it more relates to your review than his article. Regards, -- Ohc ¡digame! 03:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Ohconfucius: Care to clarify? I'm slightly confused. I'm pretty sure I'm not Hurricanehink, so I didn't review the article...? Cloudchased (talk) 03:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Que j'suis bête. -- Ohc ¡digame! 04:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cyclone Winifred edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Winifred edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Winifred you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 February 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of Mediterranean tropical cyclone edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mediterranean tropical cyclone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you for helping to clean up the mess from the mass move vandal earlier today AgneCheese/Wine 19:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Mediterranean tropical cyclone edit

The article Mediterranean tropical cyclone you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Mediterranean tropical cyclone for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mediterranean tropical cyclone edit

Orlady (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 February 2014 edit

March 2014 edit

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter edit

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1.   Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2.   Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3.   WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Winifred edit

The article Cyclone Winifred you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Cyclone Winifred for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1806 Great Coastal hurricane edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1806 Great Coastal hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 04:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1806 Great Coastal hurricane edit

The article 1806 Great Coastal hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1806 Great Coastal hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 1815 North Carolina hurricane edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1815 North Carolina hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Nice article. Would you please add the missing ships to the List of shipwrecks in 1804 with the appropriate references. Losses there referenced to British newspapers may be copied across into the hurricane article. Mjroots (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Mjroots: Ah, sorry for the delay on this; I'll try to get this done tonight when I come back. Cloudchased (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of 1815 North Carolina hurricane edit

The article 1815 North Carolina hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1815 North Carolina hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1806 Great Coastal hurricane edit

Another good hook. Cheers. Victuallers (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1815 North Carolina hurricane edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reverting My Citation Needed edit

I understand why you did it, but I saw someone else use the same tag in the lead as well. I've sporadically edited Wikipedia, so I'm not too familiar with everything, lol. Is their CITATION NEEDED tag more necessary than mine, and if it is, what makes it so? Eseress (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ohhh, well I feel dumb now. Yeah that makes sense! Whoops. Well, thanks for talk and information. I appreciate the help! Eseress (talk) 01:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for commenting again, because I didn't remember how to mark my replies! I had to use an asterisk, haha. I literally just started editing again today. :p Eseress (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 12 March 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re edit

Hope your ok and that this is just a short wikibreak. :-) Jason Rees (talk) 01:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Same! Hope the break gets the wiki-juices flowing when you come back :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Most likely I'll be back before long. Every time I've said I've been wiki-blocked in the past, I've returned to write. ;) Cloudchased (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 March 2014 edit

The Signpost: 26 March 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane edit

The article 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter edit

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer   Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist   Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato.   Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane edit

The article 1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1804 Antigua–Charleston hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup error edit

Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 02 April 2014 edit

The Signpost: 09 April 2014 edit

The Signpost: 23 April 2014 edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2014 edit

May 2014 edit

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter edit

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's   Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's   Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's   ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included   Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and   Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from   Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from   Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to   Czar (submissions) and   Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 07 May 2014 edit

The Signpost: 14 May 2014 edit

The Signpost: 21 May 2014 edit

The Signpost: 28 May 2014 edit

June 2014 edit

Thank you for your participation edit

Cloudchased, I would like to take this moment and thank you for taking part in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 04 June 2014 edit

The Signpost: 11 June 2014 edit

The Signpost: 18 June 2014 edit

The Signpost: 25 June 2014 edit

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter edit

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's   Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C,   Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with   Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to   12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from   Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from   Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of   Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

The Signpost: 02 July 2014 edit

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Bobby edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Bobby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Bobby edit

The article Cyclone Bobby you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Cyclone Bobby for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 21:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 6 July edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hurricane Arthur edit

While your contribution to articles on tropical storms and hurricanes are appreciated, there are others editing this articles as well and their contributions are valued as well. If you disagree with the inclusion of the full disk image of Arthur, please discuss it on the article's talk page, if other's agree I'll gladly go along with the consensus. Until then, please stop removing it. It is appropriate for the article and provides better context than the previous image.--RadioFan (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

@RadioFan: I believe there has already been a rationale provided for its removal; the full-disk image's thumbnail in the article practically depicts Arthur only as a tiny speck. I don't see how it provides "better context" than the previous image; the original was adjacent to a relevant paragraph. Cloudchased (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I disagree with the rationale and would like to see other editors have a chance to weigh in before this is reverted again. --RadioFan (talk) 19:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cyclone Bobby edit

Gatoclass (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Cindy (1963) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Cindy (1963) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 18:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Cindy (1963) edit

The article Hurricane Cindy (1963) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Hurricane Cindy (1963) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 09 July 2014 edit

The Signpost: 16 July 2014 edit

The Signpost: 23 July 2014 edit

DYK for Hurricane Arthur (2014) edit

The DYK project (nominate) 02:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)