Talk:Cyclone Bobby

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Bobby/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 20:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


  • " set numerous February rainfall records in parts of the Goldfields-Esperance regions of Western Australia, dropping up to 400 mm (16 in) of rain in February 1995" - maybe avoid saying "February" twice by saying "monthly" for the first usage?
  • " with 1-minute maximum sustained winds of 205 km/h (125 mph)" - either you should be using 10-min winds, assuming it's BoM, or if it's JTWC, you should be using whatever the BoM said was the winds
  • How can Bobby cause both $11 million in damage in AUS dollars and US dollars? Use this for 1991 USD from AUD
  • "The origins of Cyclone Bobby can be traced to a tropical low which formed" - use "that" when it is a restrictive clause
  • "strong eastward wind shear" - not sure if "eastward" is appropriate. That more implies direction. But if it's coming from the east, it would be easterly.
  • "and producing in favorable conditions " - cut "in"
  • "and attained Category 1-equivalent intensity on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane wind scale at 0000 UTC on 23 February, with 1-minute maximum sustained winds of 120 km/h (75 mph)." - as with before, you should specify if this is per the JTWC. I wonder, how come you don't mention when JTWC tracked it, and that you use their winds?
  • "approximately 1000 Aboriginals" - "1,000"
  • "where landing strips at Leinster and Wiluna were closed due to weather issues" --> "closing landing strips at Leinster and Wiluna"

All in all, a good read! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fixed all except one (see note). Thanks for the review! Cloudchased (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Bobby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply