User talk:Captain Almighty Nutz/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Captain Almighty Nutz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Deletion of Junkus junkii
Please just delete this page. As the message said, I created it in the last half hour ONLY to test a change I made to {{tl:Speciesbox}}. Unfortunately, I can't test the change on a page in user space because the template needs the page title to look exactly like a binomial name of a species. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Shazia_Khalid
AS YOU HAVE noticed I have been watching over IP User:178.104.110.68. He has been repeatedly vandalized the article Shazia Khalid. That's all that he has done. Please block him for this is his/her 6th time vandalizing the article. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 20:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Arman Cagle
- Done, but remember that an editor normally needs to be warned in order to be blocked (Otherwise they might not know they are doing something wrong). In this case though i agree that blanking several times is really something that should fall under common sense. And before i forget, thanks for reporting him! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Edits to 'Red Tory'
Arman,
I think if you check, all three of the external links in this article are dead links. I removed them after googling in an effort to find alternative live links.
Jovan Jovan66102 (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Mawrth Vallis
though your diligence is laudable, the article on Mawrth Vallis hardly qualifies as a wp:stub, and my edit was likewise hardly nonconstructive....thanks --68.124.133.144 (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Arman Cagle
From source User talk:a520 Are you patrolling recent pages and are you an administrator? Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi there. Please be a bit more careful with your reverts! You reverted a good faith edit here and labelled it as vandalism! Mato (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Also, here. :Mato (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the article about Oasis HD was not vandalism I mean,the IP user removed content from the page.Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 20:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- The IP user removed biased and promotional content, copy and pasted straight from the company's promotional campaign on Facebook. Content removed in good faith is not vandalism. Mato (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
How should I remove good faith edits if that?Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 20:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- It was a good edit. The user was completely correct to remove that content. You should do nothing in that situation. In a situation where the user edits in good faith but is wrong, then you should revert the edit but not label it as vandalism in the edit summary and not warn the user for vandalism on their talk page. Mato (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--
A520 | Talk me away! 16:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Ingraham High School
Hello Arman Cagle. I am wondering why you reverted my edit to Ingraham High School. The previous revision included information that was incredibly biased towards those who would want to see the principal reinstated. Unless I'm very, very much mistaken, that is clearly against WP:NPOV. I don't like engaging in edit wars, but I think you were quite mistaken. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- I shall Review the case again. Please hold on a minute. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Am I allowed to remove the warning? Some wikis have a policy on not deleting discussions, and I'm not aware if Wikipedia has anything similar. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the incident.
You are right. I have undone the edit that I have made and now the (Present state) is available. Thank you again. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- I believe that you already removed the warning from your page. That is fine. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thank you. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
My last edit on the page from One Tree Hill and 2011-2012 United States Television Network Season
Hi,
I removed the content that said that One Tree Hill and Nikita were renewed and that Hellcats got cancelled, but i didn't knew that is was true until a few minutes later, and because there wasn't a link for proof anywhere, i deleted it :) But i only recieved the news a few minutes later :)
Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.194.239.87 (talk) 20:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- What are you talking about. What Proof? Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 20:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, never mind I understood your message.
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 20:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me...
Please stop abusing Twinkle. This edit was clearly not vandalism, and as such should not have been reverted, and especially not without a summary. And please, don't just assume that all IP edits are vandalism, because from that edit of yours it looks like you do. Thanks, Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- This too, it seems. Please try to be more careful. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'd like to see an explanation for this too - repeatedly re-adding material that clearly violates WP:BLP after being correctly removed? Looks like you really need to slow down here, especially due to the number of times you seem to be reverting and then reverting yourself. There's also this, another where you were reverted by a bot, readding material I'd have removed, this, and this [stwalkerster|talk] 23:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- I will try to more careful next time. I Believe, for the Beauty Pageant, It was my mistake. Yet, for the others I will not comment.
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 13:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Alrighty, but keep in mind that if you continue to make these mistakes then your access to rollback/twinkle can (and will) be removed. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay, so what is the difference between "Restore this Version" and "Rollback" and "Rollback (vandalism)"?
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 14:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing, essentially. If you are undoing an edit which could possibly not be vandalism, use (undo) instead, and leave a custom summary as to why you are undoing the edit. Rollback should be used on obvious vandalism only. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Also, you don't need to leave a talk back for every message, I can see when you reply. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Archive 0001 Wikipedia Help Desk
Page:Wikipedia:Help Desk
Title:Arman Cagle Helping Newbies
Message sent to: Wikipedia:Help Desk
Message sent:
Hey, I was just wondering where I could find the newest account created users. I was wondering if there was a special page or something about that. I would love to help new people that are new to wikipedia.
Thanks
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 13:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I think a good place for that would be Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. It is a help page targeted at new editors. Apart from that, a lot of questions from new editors also come to this help desk. There is also a page somewhere showing a log of all newly created accounts (I can't remember where though :) ). I think you can simply put the pages I mentioned on your watchlist and try to jump in, when a question comes up (that's how I handle my work here at help desk, for example). Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Message
I have recieved this message
Hello from Wikipedia. Your recent edits to Battle of Edgehill have been identified as vandalism and reverted. Please do not vandalize pages, and if you continue to do so then you may be blocked from editing. If you have been mistakenly warned, then please let us know as soon as possible. Thanks, Ajraddatz (Talk)
I have not edited any pages at any time in Wikepedia
Craig —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.190.85 (talk) 07:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I shall investigate it. Please wait as I shall tell you of the outcome. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 13:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- I believe these are the edits that your IP had made: January 18, 2010, January 18, 2010,same date, and same date.
- Now, I believe that an IP address, anybody can use. I do not know where your IP address came from, but if that computer was used by anyone other than you, then that's how someone edited the [Battle of Edgehill].
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 13:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Lincoln Memorial section
We are currently attempting to bring the Abraham Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the Abraham Lincoln talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have replied to it.Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 14:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
IP User:User talk:90.197.194.1
Hey, I'm Arman and I am watching User talk:90.197.194.1 as he is vandalizing 020 as I speak. Can you help me with it?
- I believe that you have contacted the authorities.
Award
The Original Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your contributions! Member of the VFD 13:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
Archive 0002
Admininship
From:
User talk:Jsfouche
Exactly what is your purpose of becoming an administrator? I want to become an administrator too, but I not experienced yet to become one.please reply on my talk pageArman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)
Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page.
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi Arman, I noticed that you left messages at User talk:71.174.81.114 to warn the IP about their edits. However, as you can see from the contributions, Special:Contributions/71.174.81.114, they stopped editing at 15:58 UTC. Your warnings started 13 minutes later, at 16:11 UTC. The purpose of warnings is to let active users who are editing know that they are making mistakes and vandalising, thus encouraging them to stop. However, in your case, the warnings were not helpful as the IP had already stopped editing. One only warning or perhaps a level3/4 warning would be sufficient in this case. However, leaving a warning for every single edit that was made by the IP is not helpful. Not only does it unnecessarily clog up a user talk page, it may also scare off a potential contributor who would be intimidated by so many warnings. Please stop using Twinkle to send mass messages and use common sense when editing, otherwise your ability to use automated tools, such as Twinkle will be revoked. Kind Regards, The Helpful One 16:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gwillhickers
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gwillhickers. A discussion is going on there about that editor. Coemgenus 15:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
Using hotcat to add categories
Hi there! This may be a bit stale, but I'm not sure if you're aware of this. Back in May, you made three edits to Lilium chalcedonicum, adding three unnecessary parent categories. The species article was already categorized in Category:Lilium, so Category:Monocots, Category:Angiosperms, and Category:Plants were unnecessary. It may have just been a temporary slip-up with Hotcat. Anyway, I just thought I'd bring your attention to it. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 13:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!