Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, CamV8! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! --Merbabu (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

CamV8, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi CamV8! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Italics (or something?)

edit

Hi CamV8. Thanks for the work you're doing editing various pages, suggesting changes etc. Would you mind italicising quotes from the pages though, like this so it is easier to see where your quotes start and stop? I found your comments on the Alan Jones talk page a little hard to work out at first. you can italicise by putting a pair of apostrophes either side of the quote, ''like this''. A dn again, thanks for your constructive suggestions on various pages that i watch (and others). WotherspoonSmith (talk) 13:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brewarrina article

edit

The Brewarrina article title is Brewarrina, New South Wales. I note that this was changed several years ago just in case there was another Brewarrina. How can I change the title back to Brewarrina as there is only one?— Preceding unsigned comment added by CamV8 (talkcontribs) 02:11, 05 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

If it was normal disambiguation it would be a straightforward switch, but this isn't disambiguation, this is naming conventions. You will notice Nyngan, New South Wales and Byrock, New South Wales are the same, and many more probably are too. If Brewarrina was going to be moved, they would all need to be moved. If you want to start a discussion on this, I suggest doing it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 02:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
HI CamV8. Patchy1 has a good point. We had similar discussions around the Dubbo article a few years back (because there is an LGA of Dubbo distinct from the city of Dubbo). Brewarrina, New South Wales is a different creature from Brewarrina Shire- the naming convention is consistent with others in Wikipedia. Sometimes the standalone article looks different to how we'd name it if it wasn't part of a bigger encyclopedia, but the current name makes sense when looked at in that context. WotherspoonSmith (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Two Foot Skiff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Derwent River, Balmain, Abbotsford and North Sydney

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Speedy deletion nomination of Two Foot Skiff

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Two Foot Skiff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nimuaq (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

citation needed usage

edit

Hi, CamV8. I noticed your edits (1 and 2) to Enclave and exclave that added {{cn}} tags. To add the month and year to the template, use, for example, {{citation needed|date=April 2013}}. Without the "date=" part, the date displays as a tooltip rather than the default tooltip that explains to readers what the tag means. You can also use a "reason=" parameter to add a reason that overrides the default tooltip. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Two Foot Skiff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 23:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two Foot Skiff, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balmain, Abbotsford and North Sydney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Boat Arrivals image POV

edit

A discussion is underway at [1] about whether more detail needs to be added to the boat arrivals image to improve its POV. Please have a look and contribute. Djapa Owen (talk) 04:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia trainers requested in New South Wales

edit
 

Wikimedia Australia is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:

We'd love to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This message has been delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Sydney.

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of markets in Sydney may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Berowra Markets]''' are held the second Sunday of every month at Berowra Public School, [[Berowra, New South Wales|
  • the second Sunday of every month at Berowra Public School, [[Berowra, New South Wales|Berowra]]).<ref>{{cite web|title=Creative Berowra Market|url=http://www2b.abc.net.au/EventCentral/View/event.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff

edit
 

Hello CamV8. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Two Foot Skiff".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 23:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 1 March

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

List of PMs... "spell check"

edit

Spell check doesn't account for not knowing facts. Like that Labour was renamed to Labor in the early 1910s. Timeshift (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the correction. Timeshift. Probably shouldn't edit after midnight.CamV8 (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

How do you revert multiple vandal edits?

edit

How do you revert multiple vandal edits?

eg Frank Lowy

Thanks CamV8 (talk) 08:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

In history, locate the multiple entries. You can click 'edit' at any of them, make any corrections or additions you like, and save the article. It may be desirable, even for vandal edits, to pick up any missing work on the article and do it, of which inform the author on his/her talk page.

(Rollback is meant to make this routine task easier, but standards for using it are — currently — set too low; most often than not, a minute wasted figuring things out will result in both an article improvement, and encourage something positive in the original contributor who made an edit.)

Gryllida (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Department of Finance and Services (New South Wales)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Department of Finance and Services (New South Wales), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.finance.nsw.gov.au/about-us.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Specifically the website allows reuse non-commercially (see), but Wikipedia content license is more free than that. —Gryllida (talk) 09:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

(Moved) Gday, The new article for Department of Finance and Services (New South Wales) seems to have some potential copyright issues. Could you please point out what content is a problem. Or just delete the problem bits. Thanks CamV8 (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above messages imply there is a direct quote in the article somewhere. It took me 30 seconds to see that it is «It is responsible for supporting sustainable government finances, ... and metropolitan water policy.». Gryllida (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gillard Government, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greens, Speaker of the House of Representatives and ALP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

List of atheists in politics and law

edit

Regarding your removal of Julia Gillard from the list of atheists in politics and law: Despite looking through the archives of the Gillard talk page, I remain somewhat puzzled. She said herself, clearly and explicitly, that she does not believe in God. That is exactly what being an atheist means. The fact that she is an atheist is beyond dispute. (It is to her credit both that she has said it without feeling intimidated, and that she has not made a big thing of it in relation to her functions as PM, as befits the leader of a secular state.) So I don't see where the controversy is supposed to be… Aridd (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Grammer?

edit

Hi. Do you really believe that grammar is spelt "grammer"?. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

No but sometimes it is the little things. I assume you know he was an English teacher.CamV8 (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
?? I was referring to your edit summary. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Changes made on the article Sydney

edit

Recently, I've noticed that you had removed large amount of the section of North Shore and the reason you gave was that it was uncited content. However if you had even bothered to read the main article, you would find that it is correct. I have now manually reverted the the page and if you feel that you need to discuss the question of validity, please feel free to post on my talk page. Cheers, Dark-World25 (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Dark-World25: Content must be sourced appropriately and other Wikipedia articles cannot be used as references. Citations need to be added to the page where the content is located. This means that sources must be added to Sydney, not some other page. --AussieLegend () 14:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Indigenous Australians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Local government boundaries review

edit

Dear Cam. Do you live in the northern beaches? If so, I fear that your continual reverts of my recent edits to Warringah Council and Pittwater Council may have a bias. Would you please take discussion to the talk page(s) before reverting again. Thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Where I live is not relevant to your edits. If I had a conflict of interest I would have declared it. CamV8 (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016

edit


– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

cite markup

edit

yes I have a few bare urls at the main 2016 Tasmanian energy crisis article to fix up... JarrahTree 12:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

wow, far too kind, so few eds these days actually deserve public thanks, most grumpy do it yourself, and you have cleaned up - may your weekend be blessed/lucky/good for you - thanks JarrahTree 10:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016

edit

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

haha

edit

points taken, but hey your cite comment is arguable - the lonnie examiner news room, the abc office in hobart and the merc office )bless their socks( - are indeed not the same place, and their take on the goings on in the minds of those who dont comprehend what has been done to the hec over the last 30 years is worth multiple cites imho, my 5 c JarrahTree 05:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter (August 2016)

edit

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: September 2016

edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Newsletter: October 2016

edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: November 2016

edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, CamV8. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fair Use in Australia discussion

edit

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, CamV8. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Work in progress. Read the article and form your own opinion.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, CamV8. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Colt vs AR-15 style rifle

edit

CamV8, I didn't want you to think I'm just trying to revert your edits. Do keep in mind that DS apply to the Colt AR-15 page but what I actually wanted to do was encourage you to bring the content discussion here [[2]]. While the rifle appears to be an AR-15 pattern rifle, unless it actually is a "Colt" brand rifle it shouldn't be added to the Colt page. The AR-15 style page includes discussions of shootings with generic AR-15s as well as the controversies associated with the rifle. I think that would be an appropriate place for this content. The article on the shooting links to the AR-15 style rifle page [[3]]. I hope that explains why I reverted your edits. Take care! Springee (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to complement you on the Australian Gun Laws article. I know we didn't agree on the one section but overall I think you are doing a great job and the article is better for your efforts! Springee (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Overview of Gun Laws by Nation

edit

Apologies for my rudeness when editing the article without providing any citacions. https://www.police.qld.gov.au/programs/weaponsLicensing/acquiringWeapons/antiques/ This outlines the Queensland antique firearms law in regards to licensing registration. I changed that column to 'Varies' because the NFA is non-binding and although every state roughly abides by it, laws do differ (as shown with QLD). I believe this also clarifies why I changed the "Free of checks" column to varies as well, although I am unsure of the terminology. https://www.police.qld.gov.au/programs/weaponsLicensing/licenceApplication/licences/collectors/default.htm This page also outlines that possession of automatic weapons is legal provided the person has a Category R license. That is why I changed the "Fully automatic" firearms column to "May Issue - Restricted" as these seem to be rarely issued. As far as I am aware every state has this and I am happy to send links from other states as well. As for the "unlimited magazine" column, I am unfortunately unable to locate a correct source detailing a lack of limits on magazine capacity, however no state applies restrictions on Category A & B firearms on their firearms category page.

I again apologize for my foul behavior. I was just frustrated since we don't actually have federal laws and didn't want to link sources for every state, but it turns out that isn't too hard. The2016 (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Shall issue – subject to fulfillment of legal conditions, the authorities may not deny license and/or firearm(s)

May issue – the authorities have final say in whether a person may obtain a license and/or firearm(s)

This is also debatable. According to most state governments, provided you have fulfilled the legal conditions, you are entitled to possess a Category A firearms license and will be granted one accordingly. The2016 (talk) 12:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

https://www.police.qld.gov.au/programs/weaponsLicensing/licenceApplication/licences/firearms/default.htm and https://www.police.qld.gov.au/forms/weaponslicensing.asp These pages states sufficient evidence is only required for Category C & D firearms, and that provided the legal conditions are met, you will be granted a license. Dunno if that helps (sorry for the replies but I can't edit my first one) The2016 (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/online_services/firearms/licences/suspension_refusal_revocation_of_a_licence_or_permit/frequently_asked_questions_-_suspension_refusal_and_revocation#hedrev1 See here as well. This would make it shall issue under the article's definition. I think the state laws should be thoroughly mapped according to their individual restrictions and not just throw together in one thing since they all have different regulations and stipulations. The2016 (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Modus Operandi Brewing Company (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Modus Operandi Brewing Company (November 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 03:10, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Modus Operandi Brewing Company concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Modus Operandi Brewing Company, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Modus Operandi Brewing Company

edit
 

Hello, CamV8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Modus Operandi Brewing Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narrabeen Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply