User talk:Ashishlohorung/Archive 1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Ashishlohorung in topic Archive

Welcome!

Hello, Ashishlohorung, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lohorung, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! mhking (talk) 14:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lohorung edit

 

A tag has been placed on Lohorung, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 14:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lohorung edit

 

A tag has been placed on Lohorung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mhking (talk) 14:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Man Bahadur Majhiya edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Man Bahadur Majhiya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 02:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gurkha Nepalese Community edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gurkha Nepalese Community requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dwaipayan (talk) 05:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kolega2357 (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey, what's up. Sorry but I did delete this, but I do think that if you wanted to work on it it could potentially turn into a great article that we could keep. It all depends on whether there have been enough reliable sources (e.g. magazines, news sites, books, newspapers) that talk about the subject. What you could do is work on the article inyour userspace (that is, any page beginning with User:Ashishlohorung/... such as User:Ashishlohorung/Sandbox). That way you could take your time with it and get it to meet Wikipedia's standards for articles. Then you could move it back where it was when you're done. If you want to do that I can undelete the article and move it there for you to work on. Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything, I'm always glad to help. Peace, delldot ∇. 01:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I replied to your message on my talk page. Peace, Peace, delldot ∇. 06:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space edit

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ashishlohorung/Kumar Lingden has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kumar Lingden, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Kumar Lingden Limbu Mirak.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Kumar Lingden Limbu Mirak.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:46, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

File permission problem with File:Rajesh Payal Rai.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Rajesh Payal Rai.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 16:01, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Khartuwa-Village of Nepal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Khartuwa-Village of Nepal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 16:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Numafung edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Numafung for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, FrankDev (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Numafung edit

 

The article Numafung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, insufficient sources to pass WP:GNG and no evidence that it passes WP:NFILM. More sources possibly available in Limbu or Nepali, but not in English.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui  14:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Ashishlohorung. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 07:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Yunshui  07:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kutumba Band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepalese
List of Nepali musical bands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali
Mysansar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of Nepali Bloggers edit

 

The article List of Nepali Bloggers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just an incomplete WP:linkfarm list of non-notable bloggers

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dhol (Kirat) edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dhol (Kirat), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, 75* 21:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Charlotte Hardman edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charlotte Hardman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dengero (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Other Worlds: Notions of Self and Emotion among the Lohorung Rai for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Other Worlds: Notions of Self and Emotion among the Lohorung Rai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other Worlds: Notions of Self and Emotion among the Lohorung Rai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dengero (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mangsuk edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mangsuk, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Dmol (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Charlotte Hardman edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Charlotte Hardman. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

  1. Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
  2. This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Mangsuk edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mangsuk should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangsuk .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Dmol (talk) 01:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jhyamta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali
List of Nepali musical instruments (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali
Maghe Sankranti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali
Mangsuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lohorung
Other Worlds: Notions of Self and Emotion among the Lohorung Rai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lohorung
Yalamber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nepali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mysansar edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mysansar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ushau97 talk contribs 10:47, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sewaro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hi and Nepali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of Nepali musical instruments edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of Nepali musical instruments, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 21:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is a worthwhile list. Traditional Nepalese instruments are being collected by museums and other entities. LADave (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about List of Kirati kings edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether List of Kirati kings should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kirati kings .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ashish-ji - Maybe this needs an overview article about these kings. Then you could link to it from different articles about Nepal history and I think the rest of the world would understand its importance. LADave (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sewaro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sewaro edit

 

The article Sewaro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sewaro edit

I have restored the article, please improve and expand to show notability, or I will take to WP:AFD. Two quick points regarding your request - please post on my talk page, not my user page, and you were notified about the proposed deletion. GiantSnowman 13:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Harka Gurung edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Harka Gurung for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♥ Tentinator ♥ 06:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Very bad idea to delete this article! Harka Bahadur Gurung was a very notable academic. One of the very best in his country. LADave (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dor Bahadur Bista, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nepali and Patan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sewaro for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sewaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 12:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi There edit

Hi, can you please restore Mangsuk page as I am going to edit it to make it look good. It is the god of Lohorung. BTW, thanks for stopping by. Ashishlohorung (talk) 05:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ashishlohorung (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

    • The article was voted for deletion and is not eligible for inclusion at this time. Your options are those I wrote in my previous message. Stifle (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks, Stifle I want to userfy it .

Ashishlohorung (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Harka Gurung edit

The DYK project (nominate) 09:02, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ghunsa village of Nepal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ghunsa village of Nepal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Wilson Bikram Rai aka Takme Buda.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Wilson Bikram Rai aka Takme Buda.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=199518030165947&set=pb.145746038876480.-2207520000.1363792880&type=3&theater. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Fatalism and Development by Dor Bahadur Bista.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Fatalism and Development by Dor Bahadur Bista.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Myrepublica.com edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Myrepublica.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Syrthiss (talk) 11:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ekantipur.com edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ekantipur.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Syrthiss (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budha Subba Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tomorrow's Symposium edit

Just a quick reminder to everyone who has indicated their interest on-wiki. The Wikimedia in Higher Education symposium at The University of Sydney is on tomorrow. We have a full day of speakers and workshops, and about 45-50 participants. Don't worry if you haven't officially registered, a few extra won't hurt. See you there. --99of9 (talk) 02:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Raj Giri edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Raj Giri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nalina Chitrakar edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nalina Chitrakar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Steel Park Marrickville edit

 

The article Steel Park Marrickville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Excesses~ (talk) 11:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nalina Chitrakar edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nalina Chitrakar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —me_and 16:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sushma Karki edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sushma Karki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Arresting God in Kathmandu edit

 

The article Arresting God in Kathmandu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Book is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Citrusbowler (talk) 13:27, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cina Harayeko Manchhe edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

Namaste. This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to make a slight addition to your article backed by references. I hope you'd like mylittle effort. I'd appreciate your say on this. Best regards. (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

'review' edit

Explaining edit

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ratna Pustak Bhandar edit

 

The article Ratna Pustak Bhandar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Please add more sources to meet Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nepal (magazine) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nepal (magazine) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Ashishlohorung. You have new messages at Dusti's talk page.
Message added 02:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Himal (magazine) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Himal (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. EuroCarGT 04:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mysansar.com edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mysansar.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sam 🎤 14:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Astha Tamang Maskey edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Astha Tamang Maskey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I note your request on my talk-page for restoration of this article. It does not, however, satisfy Wikipedia notability guidelines for music performers, as detailed in WP:MUSIC. I am therefore not prepared to restore it. If you wish to appeal this decision you are free to do so at the deletion review page. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Anthony, she has been to national media and has her own music album in Nepali_language. What do you want to add up to restore the article?

Ashishlohorung (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Indira Joshi (Nepal) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indira Joshi (Nepal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Forward Unto Dawn 10:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mahendra Lawoti edit

I think the person is probably notable, but see the requirements at WP:PROF. You need to say a little more--at the very least giving all his degrees and the years and the universities that give them, and listing all his published books in proper bibliographic format. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Himal Shrestha edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Himal Shrestha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Forward Unto Dawn 07:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Ashishlohorung. You have new messages at Forward Unto Dawn's talk page.
Message added 10:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

--Forward Unto Dawn 10:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Rajesh Payal Rai.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Rajesh Payal Rai.jpg, which you've attributed to OTRS pending since January; it's time to delete.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Khartuwa-Village of Nepal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Khartuwa-Village of Nepal.jpg, which you've attributed to OTRS pending since January; it's time to delete.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shreyasi Chemjong edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shreyasi Chemjong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Cabe6403(TalkSign) 13:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Aava Mukarung edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aava Mukarung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Paul A (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Raj Kumar Lekhi edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raj Kumar Lekhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC) This is a correction to a wrong tag. Peridon (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Soch by Karna Shakya.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Soch by Karna Shakya.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Karna Shakya edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Karna Shakya should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karna Shakya .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Soch (Book) edit

 

The article Soch (Book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Psychonaut (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Armed Police Force of Nepal logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Armed Police Force of Nepal logo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Damini Bhir edit

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Damini Bhir!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seto Dharti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Om Hospital edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Om Hospital, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martinian Leave a message! 15:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Norvic International Hospital edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Norvic International Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Mr. V (tc) 04:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of SLC board toppers of Nepal edit

 

The article List of SLC board toppers of Nepal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that any of the people on the list are notable, or even that the concept of "board topper" - which is not explained - is itself notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Om Hospital edit

 

The article Om Hospital has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable institution - only refs are the hospital's own website and passing mentions in news sites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Om Hospital for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Om Hospital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Om Hospital until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Balbalika Primary School edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Balbalika Primary School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alex discussion 13:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Balbalika Primary School for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balbalika Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balbalika Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alex discussion 08:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Namaste Ashish! edit

You are getting clobbered by editors a lot! I don't know all of the topics you are writing about, but I recognized several that I think are notable enough for Wikipedia. I will be happy to work with you if you want. I'm a native speaker of English with some education. I also know some Nepali.

It can help to write articles up to at least a few paragraphs and sections in size, and to have five or ten references before you post them in Wikipedia.

All the best, देब बहादुर​ (David) LADave (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am actively working on Nepalese cuisine, trying to take this article beyond dal-bhat-tarkari and have more material about traditional food specialties of different janajati groups. I also want to write more about how food is changing in Nepal. I think it must be changing fast with so much urbanization, different castes and janajatis living close together for the first time, education, kitchen appliances, tourist foods like pizza being eaten by more and more Nepalis and maybe even cooks using cookbooks as well as learning from their mothers. But as things change and change, I think it is very important to write as much as possible about traditional foods that may be lost from history. LADave (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
That's really nice article , I will also upload pictures or other data to support this article. Keep it up .. Ashishlohorung (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Really glad to see your section about Lohorung food! I lived in Pyuthan in the Middle West. Except for a quick bus trip to Kodari and a few hours in Janakpur, I never visited eastern Nepal so I am very happy that you are adding this new material. I have read a little about Rai people, but I don't know all the different groups that are sometimes included in Rai. I know nothing about special foods in the east, unless I had them in Kathmandu or further west.
You have added a list of Lohorung foods. I think some may be eaten outside the Lohorung community too but others might be strictly Lohorung. I want to describe these foods in the article, so I will see what I can find online about them and list this below for your comments before adding it to the article itself. If the material from online is OK, you may only need to write up foods that we can't find online. Maybe there are foods that have one name in Lohorung and different names in Rai or Nepali.
Cheers, David

Ashish's list:

Found online

Tongba - beer made from millet (kodo)? see Tongba

Wachipa - typical Rai food consumed as side dish. two types...non-vegetarian is fried rice with minced chicken and powder made of burnt chicken feathers. Vegetarian does not contain meat or powder of burnt feathers, instead leaves or flowers of damlapa plant. Wachipa believed to cure body-ache.

Kinema - fermented soybeans. see Kinema

Selroti -see Sel roti

Chamre - pulao made from local rice varieties. Rice soaked with bay leaves and cinnamon, cooked with gheu and water. Eaten with potato curry with til (sesame).

Yangpen - see Cladonia rangiferina for the plant. How is it prepared?

Not Found online:

Wamik

Masikdaam

Sibring

Bawari

Dhule Achar

Saruwa

Dibu

Herbs in Sankhuwasabha District In this article you added a list of herbs grown and gathered in the district. Most are probably not familiar to Wikipedia's wider audience by these names. I was able to link most of them to other articles in Wikipedia, but the rest are unknown to me. Can you find English or Scientific names for the rest? LADave (talk) 03:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Let's collaborate edit

Ashish Jee Namaste, Good to know about your activities in Wikipedia. As you know we are recently recognized as "Wikimedians of Nepal" from the WMF. There are some wikipedia editors editing in Nepali and other local languages. There are little editors from Nepal in touch who are editing in English and other language Wikipedia. If we could be in touch, we could have good collaboration. Regards.--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Ganesh g, how can i be in that group ? Ashishlohorung (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Zenisha Moktan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zenisha Moktan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hitro talk 18:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Salt Trading Corporation edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salt Trading Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hitro talk 19:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Ashishlohorung. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 03:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (Nepal) edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (Nepal), appears to be directly copied from http://www.moics.gov.np/general_information/profile.htm. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (Nepal) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hospital Management Company edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hospital Management Company, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Salt Trading Corporation edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salt Trading Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lumbini Eye Institute for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lumbini Eye Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumbini Eye Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Dil Shova Shrestha edit

Hi, I'm FairyTailRocks. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Dil Shova Shrestha!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand the article from sources you gave. It is too short, also add more references to make the article notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. FairyTailRocks (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dil Shova Shrestha edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dil Shova Shrestha, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dil Shova Shrestha to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, FairyTailRocks (talk) 15:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Y Done FairyTailRocks (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Transparency International Nepal edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transparency International Nepal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Victão Lopes Fala! 02:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (Nepal) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ministry of Commerce and Supplies (Nepal), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Ashishlohorung. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 13:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Yunshui  13:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ekantipur.com edit

 

The article Ekantipur.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:WEB. Only claim is high visitor numbers, which doesn't prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Mdann52talk to me! 14:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Rabindra Mishra edit

Hi, I'm Stepojevac. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Rabindra Mishra!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page is very short otherwise good work. More info on who Mishra is would be helpfull.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Stepojevac (talk) 11:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Currie edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stephen Currie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Ian Thorpe does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of Borg 08:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 220 of Borg 08:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Desh Subba edit

Hi, I'm Dreambeaver. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Desh Subba!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This writer's work seems interesting, especially his introduction of fearism in Nepalese literature. It would be nice if you could include something about his works here.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dreambeaver(talk) 08:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cuppa edit

Thanks a lot for the coffee.
(Dreambeaver(talk) 13:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC))Reply

Deletion discussion about Ian Thorpe Aquatic and Fitness Centre edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ian Thorpe Aquatic and Fitness Centre should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Thorpe Aquatic and Fitness Centre .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, S.G.(GH) ping! 16:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure if it passes the notability criteria, so I've opened it up to the community to discuss the matter. I hope you'll stop by to lend us your thoughts. Regards, --S.G.(GH) ping! 16:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Justin Mateen edit

Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Justin Mateen!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some links from the article to other related pages. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 03:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Wang (Hacker), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Pocket (Software) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pocket (Software). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pocket (application). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pocket (application) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BiH (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dil Shova Shrestha for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Shova Shrestha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Shova Shrestha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to add that I'm on the fence about this one, Dil Shova Shrestha, as I think she may be notable enough to be retained. But I am worried that it is borderline and so I wanted to open it to the community to discuss it. Please, please go to the discussion and lend us your views. I don't want you to think we're being unwelcoming to your contributions. Let me know if I can help in any way. Regards, --S.G.(GH) ping! 13:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sagarmatha (Film) edit

 

The article Sagarmatha (Film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 00:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Khartuwa-Village of Nepal.jpg edit

Hello. You asked me to restore this file but it had been deleted because there was no proof that the original photographer released it under any free license. When you uploaded the file you credited Gajendra Lohorung as the author and that means that we need a written permission from Gajendra himself. Please see Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for instructions and a sample text. Unless our volunteer email team has received a permission like this I'm afraid I cannot restore the file. De728631 (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Motiram Bhatta.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Motiram Bhatta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Sipora Gurung on +977 cover 2013.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sipora Gurung on +977 cover 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Nepal Sanskrit University logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Nepal Sanskrit University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Far-western University at Kanchanpur logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Far-western University at Kanchanpur logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Pushpa Basnet, CNN Hero 2012.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pushpa Basnet, CNN Hero 2012.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Chinese New Year Google Doodle 2014.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chinese New Year Google Doodle 2014.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Phalgunanda Lingden.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phalgunanda Lingden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Lord Buddha Education Foundation logo.png missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Gorkhapatra Sansthan edit

Hi, I'm Epparadox. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Gorkhapatra Sansthan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, I have added some tags to your recently created page. These will help improve the overall quality of the article, they can be removed at any point once the issues have been corrected.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Epparadox (talk) 11:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Beverly Schwartz edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beverly Schwartz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Selfie360 edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Selfie360 for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Amar Lama edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amar Lama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NHCLS (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kangso Rey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Nepal]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yam Baral edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yam Baral for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bidhya Bhandari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhojpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (D. B. Gurung) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating D. B. Gurung, Ashishlohorung!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article is very short. Please consider expanding the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Bacchu Kailash edit

Hi, I'm Khamar. Ashishlohorung, thanks for creating Bacchu Kailash!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your page, Bacchu Kailash is very short. Please consider adding detail to it. Thank you. Kyle(talk) 06:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kyle(talk) 06:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Jhola) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Jhola, Ashishlohorung!

Wikipedia editor Jorgath just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article is a good start, but it could use some expansion, and it would be very good if you could find other Wikipedia articles that should link to it. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Jorgath's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of David Moinina Sengeh edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Moinina Sengeh for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Australian Landcare Council edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Australian Landcare Council, appears to be directly copied from http://www.daff.gov.au/natural-resources/landcare/council. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Australian Landcare Council if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dibya Subba edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dibya Subba for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nhyoo Bajracharya edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nhyoo Bajracharya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ace Institute of Management edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ace Institute of Management for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 21:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Film Development Board edit

Is a simple definition all that can be said about the Film Development Board. If so, this article will likely be nominated for deletion. Please consider returning and adding to this article.--RadioFan (talk) 02:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Taylor Dow edit

 

The article Taylor Dow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is a promotion for a franchising business.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shesh Ghale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks Ashish for the warm cup of tea!--Eukesh (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Huo Daishan edit

Use reflist on the article Huo Daishan.--Skr15081997 (talk) 07:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ernesto Domingo edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ernesto Domingo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nar Bahadur Saud edit

Did you forget to finish this stub? Bearian (talk) 21:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Alternative Indigenous Development Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to state notability, poorly referenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Stub sorting edit

 
Hello Ashishlohorung. Thank you for tagging an article as a stub. I noticed that you used the {{stub}} template. In the future, it would be greatly appreciated if you could sort the article to a subcategory by using one of these templates instead. For example, you can use {{US-novelist-1960s-stub}} for an American novelist born in the 1960s. Of course, if you can't find a proper category, you can always use the {{stub}} tag and someone else will sort it for you, or you can propose a new stub template or category here. Thanks!

--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Krystal Barter may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | caption = Krystal Barter at the launch of her memoir The Lucky One]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ciney Gurung edit

 

The article Ciney Gurung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NM. Sources are promotional and or affiliated and fail WP:RS. Article this fails WP:V. A Google search yielded nothing that would ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Raimundo Arruda Sobrinho edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Raimundo Arruda Sobrinho for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jyoti (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lal Babu Pandit edit

Hello Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lal Babu Pandit for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheQ Editor (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Tri Mumpuni) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Tri Mumpuni, Ashishlohorung!

Wikipedia editor Harsh 2580 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your article has been reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Harsh 2580's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Krishna Pandey edit

Hi,

The page about which you inquire was deleted as a result of Wikipedia's proposed deletion process. Under this process, the protest of any editor -- including yourself -- is sufficent to get the article restored. I will do this shortly. The assertions that led to the article's deletion were not mine, by the way. They were written by the person who nominated the page for proposed deletion. The restoration which I will perform does not protect the article from future challenge: it may still be nominated for a full deletion debate, where its merit will be argued.

The reason for the proposed deletion was that the article failed Wikipedia's notability policy for people renowned for only one event. If it were entirely my decision, I would be inclined to agree with you that all world records and record-holders are notable. However, Wikipedia operates by consensus, and it is often the case that articles of world-record holders are deleted, especially if the record is obscure, or if the sourcing for the article is not extensive. To maintain the article, I can only advise you to locate as many reliable sources as possible documenting the record. The more sources, the more likely the article is to be kept. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Hi Ashish ji

This Barnstar is awarded to you for your effort in editing Wikipedia and teaching me how to do it. I'm proud that you are the second place based on the number of edit count and i hope you will be in the first place soon. Keep on going best of luck. Naren Kulung (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:32, Sunday, May 5, 2024 (UTC)


List of disappeared people of Nepal edit

Please read WP:LIST. If you continue to paste such cruft on this encyclopedia, you risk being blocked. Bearian (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

HI, Bearian, I have read the WP:LIST and found that I have not violated any of the rules mentioned there. I just want to create an article that list the missing or disappeared people of Nepal. Thanks Ashish Lohorung (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have just had a look at your editing history, particularly your creation of articles, including those which have been deleted. I have seen article after article which comes nowhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, many of them written in promotional tone, frequently containing totally inadequate references, blatantly satisfying one or other of the provisions of WP:What Wikipedia is not. It is entirely the sort of thing that is to be expected from a new editor who does not have enough experience of Wikipedia to know better, but for an editor of your experience to be still making such mistakes so frequently suggests a lack of the necessary competence to edit. I should emphasise that I am not talking about a significant minority among many good articles: of a substantial sample of your articles, every single one was either clearly unsuitable or else borderline suitable, with significant problems. I have also seen other problems in your editing, one of the most disturbing being this edit, where you appear to be openly declaring your intention of using Wikipedia to promote a cause. A block is by no means out of the question if you continue as you have been doing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Iceberg B31 edit

 

The article Iceberg B31 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gorkha FM edit

 

The article Gorkha FM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Absolutely no evidence at all of satisfying the notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

For your recognition, Much appreciated. Regards, Ericoides (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

No worries, mate Ashish Lohorung (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nigerian kidnapping edit

The article is undoubtedly notable enough, and the quality of references now on the page give a guide to its widespread coverage. One reason for the regrettable paucity of media coverage is the sheer volume of recent attacks carried out as part of the insurgency, and the inevitable "Oh Dearism" that results, with the most important reason, in my opinion, being the lack of information from the authorities coupled with the inaccessible and violent nature of Chibok and the surrounding area, which hampers good journalism. It can be very dispiriting to create and maintain articles such as these, I created Sahar Gul a while ago, and I haven't seen any updates in a while. Acts of extreme violence in developing countries can sometimes end with no clear resolution, but the fact that the page was started will be testament to the fact that people do care enough to write about it, and that is our part to play. Thanks for your recent valuable contributions. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gareth, really thanks for supporting my point of view. I do understand that the facts and figures of the progress of the incident might be not accurate, however based on that we cannot ignore the mass violation of human rights and the cruel kidnapping. So just to keep it on the subject of concern I have created the article and yes I was first disappointed how could it had not come up earlier. Thank You. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 09:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, I read about Sahar Gul and it was really disturbing. How could humans could be so cruel? This kind of stories should be out so that all people knows what is going on in reality. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've moved Chibok to "Chibok schoolgirl kidnapping". The page needs some TLC. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for the cup of coffee!--Cattus talk 11:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

ITN credit edit

ThaddeusB (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot ThaddeusB, for all the effort you have done to post in the main news. Really appreciated. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Govinda Poudel edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Govinda Poudel should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govinda Poudel .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thankee edit

Thanks for the coffee, I wish the article never had to be written in the first place. Keep up your brilliant work, may google books bless you and keep you. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Miss Nepal titleholders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Ishani Shrestha.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ishani Shrestha.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marty Cobb death edit

 

The article Marty Cobb death has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 13:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subin Limbu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Patrick James McGlinchey) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Patrick James McGlinchey, Ashishlohorung!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

You are most welcome Carriearchdale. I really appreciate your review. Thank you to you too. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about 2014 Fundacion bus fire edit

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 2014 Fundacion bus fire should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Fundacion bus fire .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Polyglot (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Augustine Joung Kang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. miszatomic 16:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2014 Badaun raped suicide edit

 

The article 2014 Badaun raped suicide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

News item with no indication of notability or lasting significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2014 Layyah rape murder incident edit

 

The article 2014 Layyah rape murder incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Melina Manandhar.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Melina Manandhar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Karishma Manandhar.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Karishma Manandhar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 17:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Jal Shah, Nepal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Jal Shah, Nepal.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Bipana Thapa.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Bipana Thapa.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Subin Limbu Miss Nepal 2014.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Subin Limbu Miss Nepal 2014.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Arunima Lamsal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Arunima Lamsal.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ophiocordyceps sinensis Suggestion edit

Hi. I am a bit confused by this edit and how the Ophiocordyceps sinensis relates to the 2014 Dolpo police crackdown, and then on that page, how Yarchagumba royalty relates back to Ophiocordyceps sinensis. At the very least, this relationship needs to be clarified and expanded--or else removed. Perhaps it is just a language or cultural issue--something that is very clear to someone familiar with the words, events, and political issues involved. However, to an outsider like me, it is very confusing. I almost reverted the edit thinking it was someone with a political agenda trying to use Wikipedia to promote a certain viewpoint. I looked at your edit history and contributions, and while it appears that you do lean strongly toward sympathetic views of the Nepalese culture and against the Chinese administration of the area, I think you've demonstrated a lot of good sense and fairness in the past in your edits, which is why I approached you directly.

Like I said, I don't understand how the 2014 Dolpo police crackdown relates to the fungus/caterpillars. Did that even occur in the same region? How does it related to the fungus/caterpillars? How does the Yarchagumba relate back to them? It's all very unclear and confusing to an outsider like me. Bear in mind that many people coming to this article probably are primarily related to the health benefit claims of the fungus (that's how I came upon it), and the whole political and economic side to the issue is completely new to us. Such references need to be very clear to outsiders to be effective and not come across as a grumpy, disenfranchised bunch of rhetoric aimed variously at exploiters of the supposed health benefits, the Chinese government, and the locals.

If you could clarify some of that and help to improve those two articles and the redirect, I think it would really help to improve both articles. Perhaps, the economic and political side of the issue deserves its own article separate from the rest. I don't know the topic well enough to say. It just feels like the articles need a lot of improvement to make them more effective and informative. Have a great week! Willscrlt ( Talk | com | b:en | meta ) 16:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Willscrlt, it has been pleasure to get such suggestion about improving Wikipedia articles. This is why I like Wikipedia where having various background come together to create beautiful ocean of knowledge. Thank you for letting me know about the issue before reverting. As for the article 2014 Dolpo police crackdown which reads 2 people were killed by police and many locals injured, is directly related with Yarchagumba. The best article that explains the incident lies in here. Basically, there is huge conflict among the locals and foreigners that who has the right to collect the fungus. The deaths are the result of the conflict. You can follow the links in the article to know more about the incident which is being investigated by National Human Rights Commission of Nepal. I will be adding more to the articles soon. Also, it would be great if other contributors are too willing to help to expand the articles. And yes your are absolutely right in the sense that those articles need to be improved. Thank you for your suggestion and nice to meet with you. Have a good time.Ashish Lohorung (talk) 08:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2014 Dolpo police crackdown for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Dolpo police crackdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Dolpo police crackdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Justin Mateen for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Mateen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Mateen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of deaths related to the 2014 FIFA World Cup for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of deaths related to the 2014 FIFA World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deaths related to the 2014 FIFA World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for you! edit

  The Nepal Barnstar of National Merit
Great work creating Nepal related articles. Hackerboyas (Talk) 15:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank so much bhai. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of medias of Nepal
added links pointing to ATV, APTN, Business Plus, AP, News 24 and UCAN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of building collapses in India edit

 

The article List of building collapses in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. Unfortunate but I don't see notability here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Nepal government organizations may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *http://www.nhrcnepal.org National Human Rights Commission] <br>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Nepal government organizations
added links pointing to Ministry of Defense, Inland Revenue Department, Ministry of Information and Communication, Ministry of Water Resources, Ministry of Home Affairs, Public Service Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Industry, National Planning Commission, National Police Academy and Ministry of Energy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Archive edit

I guess you must archive your talk page messages as it has already reached 179+. It would load a little faster if you archive. My talk page is archived by Clue bot III. You must try archiving. Cheers and thanks for working on Wikiproject Nepal articles! Hackerboyas (Talk) 14:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion Hackerboyas, that's great idea. Ashish Lohorung (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply