Barnstars

Azov Battalion edit

I have started a discussion in which you may care to comment at [[1]] Cheers Elinruby (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ANI edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BSMRD (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)}}Reply

chris rock image edit

Hello. the page is to show the viewer image of what happened during the image. Instead of googling the image, its in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSecondComing10 (talkcontribs) 15:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@TheSecondComing10: You aren't supposed to remove the old prod template from the talk page, if the prod is removed. - hako9 (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The deletion did not make any sense, so i closed it down as of Speedy Keep. TheSecondComing10 (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Knowing edit

Why an article is gonna to be deleted. How can I edit that to avoid deletation.. জাবিরটটক (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@জাবিরটটক The best way to avoid deletion would be to provide mainstream reliable sources and/or scholarly sources either in the article or on the deletion discussion page here. Please also read WP:AFDEQ and WP:AFDFORMAT if you want to comment on the deletion discussion page. - hako9 (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Meesho edit

Hello admin,

I have revised Draft:Meesho and removed the poor references you suggested. Meesho is a well known brand in India and competes against Amazon and Flipkart. There are hundreds of references available about it but I have tried to narrow them down. Please have a look at the draft and accept it if it's good enough. Everbethesame (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:CORPDEPTH, especially the sections "Numerical facts", "Significant coverage of the company itself" and "Examples of trivial coverage". The article reads like pitch deck. There are indeed a tonne of reliable sources, but there's very little in those sources that can be included in the article. Routine news like capital raises, company announcements and pretty much anything that company insiders say about the company, which is directly quoted by the publisher, shouldn't be included, unless there's a good reason to do so. Few tips; focus on quality over quantity. See WP:REFBOMB. Almost all of the 40 sources are routine coverage. Exclude all trivial achievements and capital raises, or maybe condense them into a single line with few prominent funders. — hako9 (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you! edit

  A cup of tea for you, I wish they had a better milky tea as well in the drop down but there was none and I dont want to make my own, I am having flatulence issues and I just wanted to thank for the last message you dropped. (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ingesting too much conspiracy can cause excessive flatulence. — hako9 (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ukrainian Labour Temple edit

Just flagging for you that your recent edit to the Ukrainian Labour Temple page is a good piece of writing, but expands the scope of the page in a way that's new, and makes it a bit confusing. The preexisting page was for the Ukrainian Labour Temple in Winnipeg. The History section you added focuses on the 1950 bombing of the Ukrainian Labour Temple in Toronto. I've left it there for the time being, but I think we need to decide how to correct this contradiction.

The page could be rewritten (and probably retitled) to be about Ukrainian Labour Temples (plural) in Canada, so that it could contain information on several prominent ones, as well as discuss their totaly scope—though given their association with the Association of United Ukrainian Canadians/Ukrainian Labour Farmer Temple Association, that history might be better suited to the Association's page. Alternatively, we could leave this page as just about the Ukrainian Labour Temple in Winnipeg, and expand the information about the bombing to make a new article about the 1950 bombing of the Ukrainian Labour Temple in Toronto.

I thought you might have an opinion on this, but I'm happy to make some decisions about changes myself if you don't. Thanks for your work! Handpigdad (talk) 21:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Handpigdad Looking at it again, this is a clear mistake on my part. The incident has nothing to do with Ukrainian Labour Temple, Toronto as you say. Imo, the section needs to be deleted in its entirety and maybe a shorter version needs to be shifted to the AUUC article. — hako9 (talk) 10:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply