User talk:Anarchyte/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Anarchyte. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Page history undeletion
@Anarchyte: Would it be ok if you undeleted the page history of these gaming articles: List of Mario Party minigames, Great Fox, Star Wolf (Star Fox), Wizpig, Kremlings, Krunch, Donkey Kong's animal buddies, and List of non-Kremling Donkey Kong enemies? Some of these are Star Fox, and others could benefit the Mario franchise strategy guide wikibook. Would it be also ok if List of locations in the Star Fox series is undeleted and moved to a Draft namespace (I'll let you know when it's transwikied)? These undeletion requests are all for the benefit of Wikibooks' game guide scope. 2005-Fan (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @2005-Fan: Done. Most are present in mainspace but for some that were too expansive to restore (and would go against the AFD), they're located in your userspace (User:2005-Fan/Star Wolf, User:2005-Fan/Kremlings, User:2005-Fan/Donkey Kong's animal buddies, User:2005-Fan/List of non-Kremling Donkey Kong enemies). I restored the list to Draft:List of locations in the Star Fox series. Anarchyte (talk) 08:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you -- the draft has been transwikied over at https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Star_Fox_franchise_strategy_guide/Locations 2005-Fan (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Forgot to ask if page history for Wolfen (Star Fox series) can also be restored (should be my only request for today). 2005-Fan (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you -- the draft has been transwikied over at https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Star_Fox_franchise_strategy_guide/Locations 2005-Fan (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Flint McGlaughlin
Am I being too cynical in suspecting that Flint McGlaughlin which has just been recreated after you deleted it per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flint McGlaughlin might be a WP:G4? Thanks, Jonathan A Jones (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Jonathan A Jones: Liz got to it before I could. I'm not the greatest fan of G4, but yes, it could have definitely been seen as a recreation. Anarchyte (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jonathan A Jones (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Request
I need to request you that please delete the revision [1] and [2] as RD3 as that revision was purely disruptive or delete as the reason WP:RD2 as it also violates a biography of a living person or delete as the reason "Vandalism" because that revision is not supposed to be visible. Thanks. 106.212.47.195 (talk) 14:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, please don't. The IP is a sock of one of our most prolific (and other adjectives best not used on a platform known for its civility) LTAs. Favonian (talk) 14:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello Anarchyte,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
draft in prose
Hi, as per your recommendation I rewrote that companies draft [[3]] in prose, based on a 2nd example a mod recommended and looked at a few others to see if it was in line. I resubmitted and the reviewers say it is exactly the same, however in addition to rewriting, I reorganized it, removed several things that could be misinterpreted and used less detail. Headings are different, and not chronological to make it easier for people to follow, as this was not 'prose.' It gives me the impression people are just looking at why it was previously rejected and ignoring the changes. Since your provided some feedback previously, I was wondering if you would look at the newer version. Thank you kindly iwanturCAT (talk) 06:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- @TheGremlin: The article still reads like an advertisement, as Robertsky mentioned three months ago. Please see WP:NCORP. Anarchyte (talk) 06:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting this page, TMSB from vandals. But I think we may need to protect it for an infinite.
Hello. I just want to say thanks for protecting the Magic School Bus TV series from vandals. Speaking of vandals, I was also noticing some vandalism on that page since 1st of August. One anonymous user, (172.58.87.64) vandalized the main heading on the top beside the info box, and put in fan-made content (and stated, "It ended up morphing into PAW PATROL in 2014." link is here, another vandal (2600:8800:3:bb00:d87f:7281:656:bcae) was vandalizing the infobox, putting the incorrect final air date (June 21, 2006), put an incorrect number of seasons to 13, list of episodes to 111, and put in all incorrect TV networks that the series originally aired such as Playhouse Disney, Nickelodeon (although it aired in Latin America and United Kingdom, but not in the United States), Nick Jr. (also aired in the United Kingdom from 1999 to 2001, but also not in the United States), and Noggin. He even vandalized the picture format, to 720i (16:9 HDTV) (2002-2006). link to this is here. Please you need to protect this page for an infinite amount, since the Magic School Bus (TV series) is a prone to vandalism, fan-made content, and etc. VictorRocks (talk) 23:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- @VictorRocks: I don't see a need for indefinite protection. The article rarely gets more than 15 edits a month (ignoring the last few) and it's only been protected once before. After it becomes unprotected, keep monitoring the page and if it continues, request an extended period of protection. Anarchyte (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Good. I will monitor the page if any vandals try to harm it.
"History of the world" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect History of the world. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 19#History of the world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 16:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Contesting Page Deletion of Rajiv rattan (Chairman of Rattan India Enterprises)
Dear Sir,
This is to bring to your notice, that Rattan India Page of Our Chairman Mr. Rajiv Rattan has been deleted under " section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion". Our request is to reinstate the page of Mr. Rajiv Rattan back. If there are certain requirements from our side that can aid in fulfilling his identity of importance then we would be happy to provide you with it.
In the meanwhile i am sharing his LinkedIn Profile link and also as a chairman his message on Rattan India Website.
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/rajiv-rattan-924333/
Rattan India Website (Rajiv Rattan as a chairman Message)- https://www.rattanindia.com/about-us/
Best Regards Rattan India Team--Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Our company Power plant Wiki Page : AmravatiOur Company Owned Nashik Thermal Power station
Contact Person 1:
Vikram Bhambhu (Redacted) (Redacted) (Redacted) --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Contact person 2: Nikhil Kumar Mishra Deputy Vice President- Marketing (Redacted) (Redacted) --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Contesting Page Deletion of our company page RattanIndia
Dear Sir,
This is to bring to your notice, that the Wikipedia page of our company RattanIndia has been deleted as per this link- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rattanindia
Our request is to reinstate the page of RattanIndia. If there are certain requirements from our side that can aid in fulfilling his identity of importance then we would be happy to provide you with it.
In the meanwhile, I am sharing the Rattan India Website.
Rattan India Website https://www.rattanindia.com/
Best Regards
Rattan India Team --Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Our company Power plant Wiki Page : AmravatiOur Company Owned Nashik Thermal Power station
Contact Person 1:
Vikram Bhambhu (Redacted) (Redacted) (Redacted)--Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Contact person 2: Nikhil Kumar Mishra Deputy Vice President- Marketing (Redacted) (Redacted)--Bhambhuvikram (talk) 07:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Some other editors at another FFD discussion believe that your closure on File:Aint Nobody.jpg may have been incorrect and that a few arguments were questionable. --George Ho (talk) 03:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @George Ho: Thanks for letting me know. However, the discussion you linked took place months back. Is there a more recent one? Anarchyte (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- ...No. That's as recent as it goes. You still stand by the decision? --George Ho (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- I personally think that we don't need cover art for every cover album that is listed on a page, and I think quoting WP:NFCCP#8 is stretching the policy a little. I remember the article for the Music of Rocket League used to have the OST art before that was deleted (IIRC) under the argument that being able to look at the artwork doesn't add or remove anything of quality to or from the article. However, I do think that NFCCP#3a is a weaker argument in retrospect. The concept of equivalency should be fleshed out more because it's ambiguous as to whether it means "this is a different crop of the same image and we don't need both" or "these two files are both depicting art, we don't need both". The former would allow every cover art of every song (as long as it met #8), and the latter would mean that we'd only host the cover art of songs that directly pertinent to the article (the original, and maybe the most significant alternate versions, not every single one). Anarchyte (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- ...No. That's as recent as it goes. You still stand by the decision? --George Ho (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Increasing page protection
Hi Anarchyte, I'd like to inform you about an ongoing revert-war against my review by a user on the Prime Minister of Canada article. I had already filed for the increasing the page protection. I just wanted to notify you, since I can find you listed on current active admins. Thanks, —Wiki Linuz ( 💬 ) 12:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @WikiLinuz: I've blocked them for 24 hours for edit warring. Anarchyte (talk) 12:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Reviewing an article
Hi Anarchyte, could you review the Nick Mathewson article if you get some time? (and possibly mark it as reviewed?) Thanks. —Wiki Linuz ( 💬 ) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
request for rollbackers rights
@Anarchyte: Hi , Please give rollbackers right because i am remove vandalism on articles and userpage and talkpage i am already request on WP:PERM.Plase check me my contribution and gave me this right.Best Regards.Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 06:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
New page reviewer
Hello Sir Anarchyte, Sir I kindly requested permission to be a new pages reviewer, Could you please sir see it. Request Superatp 10:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Superatp: Replied there. Anarchyte (talk) 13:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Sir what I wat to do to be a New Pages Reviewer, I'm sure I will do it better, Sir please concern about me, Thank You. Superatp 14:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- New page reviewers need to have a solid grasp of English and Wikipedia policy, and unfortunately your articles (such as NERO (video game)) are neither written at an acceptable level or meet policy. I had to remove half the prose of NERO because of copyright concerns, which is completely unacceptable for a prospective NPR. Anarchyte (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok sir I understood, Sir Could you please text me English and Wikipedia policies to learn make my mistakes as soon as possible.Superatp 14:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Superatp: I appreciate the enthusiasm, but you have a long way to go before being eligible for NPR. You can start by browsing WP:CV and WP:MOS. Anarchyte (talk) 15:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot sir, I will make articles and send them to you, if you not mind give me advices sir, please sir. Superatp 16:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much sir I am gathering lot of thing which I missed, I much obliged for your favour, Thanks sir, Superatp 16:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Superatp: I appreciate the enthusiasm, but you have a long way to go before being eligible for NPR. You can start by browsing WP:CV and WP:MOS. Anarchyte (talk) 15:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok sir I understood, Sir Could you please text me English and Wikipedia policies to learn make my mistakes as soon as possible.Superatp 14:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- New page reviewers need to have a solid grasp of English and Wikipedia policy, and unfortunately your articles (such as NERO (video game)) are neither written at an acceptable level or meet policy. I had to remove half the prose of NERO because of copyright concerns, which is completely unacceptable for a prospective NPR. Anarchyte (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Sir what I wat to do to be a New Pages Reviewer, I'm sure I will do it better, Sir please concern about me, Thank You. Superatp 14:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello sir Anarchyte, Sir I made a new article of Derana Dream Star with my own writing, please sir check it and give me advices, I kindly hope your reply sir. Thank you sir.—Superatp( 💬 ) 05:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're still copying and pasting from online sources, which is a big problem. Anarchyte (talk) 06:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much sir, I take my full force to stop it sir, However I will hundred present stop it as soon as possible. Sir please tell me can you see a progress of me sir?. Thank you.—Superatp( 💬 ) 06:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're still nowhere near ready. Just devote some time to familiarising yourself with the links above, and over time your grasp of English will improve. Anarchyte (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely Sir, I will do so, thank you very much for giving me great advices and lead me to be a good Wikipedian. Thank you sir.—Superatp( 💬 ) 11:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
PERM/R
Sup. I was idly thinking (always dangerous). Do you think PERM/R admins would find it helpful if users who applied were given a selection of several random recent changes and had to say what action they would take for them? Perhaps we could pick an equal mix of changes that were actually reverted and changes that weren't. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Enterprisey: That's definitely an interesting idea. I think its usefulness would have to depend on the implementation. Requiring admins to ask the question themselves would likely create a larger backlog than we've already got, but if a bot was able to post 3-5 recent IP/new user changes from the "Likely have problems" and "Very likely have problems" filters on RC, it could be another way to see how the applicant would use rollback. I'll start trialing the idea by posting a few whenever I'm not convinced by an applicant (both for RB and PCR). Anarchyte (talk) 06:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I was thinking of making a separate tool/script/whatever so admins would do no new work at all. Yeah, the RC filters would be a great way to do this. I would also want to see if there could specifically be at least one unsourced addition, to check for PRESERVE. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Enterprisey: While we're on the topic of PERMS, what do you think of either of these ideas in theory?
- Letting new page patrollers grant autopatrolled.
- Introducing a permission that combines pending changes and rollback, and also grants the power to assign both of these permissions to other users.
- I brought these up at the 2021 RFA review where xaosflux noted that it could be worth discussing it further (or at least the first idea), but I'd like to see whether people think these are worth discussing before taking them to a broader audience. Anarchyte (talk) 06:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- I actually like combining PCR and rollback. I wonder what the community would think. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
PCR rights expiration
Hi Anarchyte, my pending changes reviewer rights is expiring on 24th. Since you're the administrator who granted me the timed PCR rights, could you make an assessment of my reviews and make a decision regarding granting the PRC rights indefinitely? Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 20:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if I need to make the request again at WP:PERM/PCR. WikiLinuz (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- (PS: Nevertheless, I've submitted my request at PERM/PCR page, following the pattern of other editors. Apologies for raising this on your talk page.) WikiLinuz (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Revdel request
Hello. If appropriate, would you mind deleting some revisions at Talk:Zfg, namely 1052137850 to 1052349065? The subjects alleged name was used, and I think it is a BLP vio. Thanks! – Pbrks (t • c) 17:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Proposals on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Anarchyte,
Just a reminder if you are helping out at WP:REFUND, if you restore a page that was deleted due to CSD G13 conditions, you need to make a minor edit to the page after you restore the page or it shows up as eligible for deletion again. There is a script, User:SD0001/RFUD-helper, that will remember to do these edits for you, if you decide to add REFUND to your round of regular activities, you might want to install this script. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: Interesting. I used that script to undelete User:BigDav188/sandbox. There may be a bug in the script so I'll keep this in mind for the future and I'll make manual edits whenever it doesn't work as intended. Anarchyte (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
3 day semi-protection at Whitewashing in film
Hi Anarchyte. Is three days really appropriate for Whitewashing in film? I've had this page on my watchlist for years, and all I ever see is disruption and vandalism from IPs; it's magnetic. I was hoping that someone would indefinitely semi-protect it at this point. Even under semi-protection, unconfirmed accounts can suggest edits on the talk page using the appropriate template. Is there a downside that I'm not seeing? Could you please respond with a talkback or ping? AlexEng(TALK) 08:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't think it was right to jump to indefinite protection when the article only sees sporadic vandalism every few months. There are also some instances of IPs contributing constructively, or at least in good faith. If a few close short-term protections prove ineffective, then indefinite may be suitable. We could also consider long-term pending changes as an alternative. Anarchyte (talk) 14:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's a fair point. I also considered requesting PC when I filed the request, but I generally reserve PC requests for high-traffic pages or situations where disruptive edits can be particularly damaging to the reader, such as Marriage age in the United States. I'll follow your lead with respect to the remedy you provided. Thanks for the thoughtful response! AlexEng(TALK) 19:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Wana Decrypt0r screenshot.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wana Decrypt0r screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of most-disliked YouTube videos for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-disliked YouTube videos (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Here we go again. Anarchyte (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.
Blocked user (promotional username)
Hi Anarchyte. The user who blocked by you User:OzgurMedes has been renamed. FYI. Regards. chansey msg? 20:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincent Vega (talk • contribs)
- @Vincent Vega: Thanks for letting me know. I've unblocked them. Anarchyte (talk) 02:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Wilson Fisk (Marvel Cinematic Universe)
Hey, could you please restore the original redirect version as it never redirected to Kingpin (character). Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, please add back
{{Fictional character redirect|series_name=Marvel Cinematic Universe}}as well so it places it in its original category. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Anarchyte. Would you mind taking a look at my proposal at Talk:TikTok#Re-arranging content to comply with MOS:LEAD and MOS:LAYOUT? Your name is listed at WP:APPS, so I'm hoping you might be interested in the subject matter. I'm a bit stuck there - no one has voiced any opposition to my proposal in principle, so under normal circumstances I would just make the changes boldly, but since I work for ByteDance (TikTok's parent company), I don't want to make any significant edits to the article directly. Thanks! Bkenny44 (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Bkenny44, sorry for the delay. I'll try to have a look soon. Anarchyte (talk) 11:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Anarchyte. I saw your comment at Talk:TikTok agreeing with my proposal. I would appreciate it if you could implement the layout change yourself, since I prefer not to edit the article directly for such a sweeping change, given my COI. Alternatively, if you would explicitly give me the green light on the Talk page, I wouldn't mind doing the busy work myself. Thanks! Bkenny44 (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am not overly familiar with the topic or article, so I don't think I would be the best one to implement the change. If you go to the talk page section and add {{edit request}} and mention that you would like assistance implementing the layout changes, someone will help. Note that this should only be layout changes and not direct content modification. I didn't read the whole proposed article (or the current version) outside of the headings. Anarchyte (talk) 08:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Anarchyte. I saw your comment at Talk:TikTok agreeing with my proposal. I would appreciate it if you could implement the layout change yourself, since I prefer not to edit the article directly for such a sweeping change, given my COI. Alternatively, if you would explicitly give me the green light on the Talk page, I wouldn't mind doing the busy work myself. Thanks! Bkenny44 (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added {{request edit}}, as it can't hurt. My concern is that - based on my own experience - it can take months for an edit request in the queue to receive a response, and this proposal has already been sitting on the Talk page since September. I can make the layout changes myself, from a technical standpoint - what I'd like, ideally, is for you to put it "on the record" that it's OK for me to do so directly despite my COI, seeing as consensus has been reached. I hope that makes sense. Bkenny44 (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive |  |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
Merchandise giveaway nomination
|
A token of thanks
Hi Anarchyte! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
 |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:WikiProject Swami Vivekananda/Drafts/The Life of Swami Vivekananda: by His Eastern and Western Disciples" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:WikiProject Swami Vivekananda/Drafts/The Life of Swami Vivekananda: by His Eastern and Western Disciples and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Wikipedia:WikiProject Swami Vivekananda/Drafts/The Life of Swami Vivekananda: by His Eastern and Western Disciples until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 16:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Martin Luther King Jr. on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)