User talk:Abductive/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Abductive. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
.jpg)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.
Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by 
Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by 
MPJ-DK (submissions), 
Hurricanehink (submissions), 
12george1 (submissions), and 
Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by 
Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with 
J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)
Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Coords relevant to pomelo
- {{Coord|13.23|77.7|display=inline,title}} Location of Devanahalli taluk, where these pomelo are grown.
Please do not remove.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University of Illinois at Chicago may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 290 (Illinois)|I-290]] and [[Interstate 90 in Illinois|I-90]]/[[Interstate 94 in Illinois|I-94]]) and opened in February 1965.<ref name="CircleCamp2Hist">[http://www.uic.edu/depts/uichistory/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Pfizer
On 6 April 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pfizer, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
What about the ref?
For this edit to Sarmientosaurus your edit summary says "trivia removed" but you left the reference attached to the statement behind. I can find a statement in the source supporting the sentence you removed (not very well) and I can find some statements that may be supporting the statement to which you left the reference attached but it's not so direct. Did you mean to leave the reference behind in your edit? Jason Quinn (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dennis Hastert did not appear constructive, and will be undone if not undone already. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 May newsletter
Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.
Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Cas Liber (submissions) and one by 
Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by 
Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by Hurricanehink (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by 
Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while 
The C of E (submissions) and MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
"... watched you repeatedly lie ..."
So, in this diff you make a somewhat unpleasant accusation that I have "repeatedly lied". I wonder if you would be good enough to provide me multiple diffs that support that please? Or perhaps I don't understand what it is you think I have been (allegedly) deliberately misleading the community about. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Nudge. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, if you don't respond (and I know you've read this), then I'll remove your fallacious personal attacks, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Remove my comments and I'll go straight to ANI. Abductive (reasoning) 00:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fine, then please supply me with diffs that prove that I "repeatedly lied" or I'll redact them as a personal attack. ANI is fine by me because I'm made more than reasonable attempts for you to provide evidence for you claims. You have until the end of the weekend, or I'll see you ANI myself. The Rambling Man (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- here's where I complained but you have repeatedly said that there was no problems/complaints with the trial. Abductive (reasoning) 18:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not good enough. That is very far from "repeatedly lying" about something. As for your final statement, yes, I believe that to be the case, just as you believe it not to be the case, it's called "opinion". But I have not accused you have "repeatedly lying". So I'll see you at ANI tomorrow morning. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not good enough. I want the diffs where I "repeatedly misrepresent" please. As noted above, I have repeated my opinion that the trial was a success, as have many other editors (but you don't personally attack them), but remember, success is a subjective metric in this case. If you meant "repeatedly state" then that makes a lot more sense. Otherwise you're still in WP:NPA territory and we'll sort it out the dramaboard way, as you suggested. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- You said nobody had a problem with the trial or its results, ignoring people's complaints--not just mine. You said that in several places, even after I pointed out that people had complaints/problems with the trial and associated fallout. You oversold constantly in an attempt to ram this awful thing down our gullets. Even now you are trying to ram this thing through with wikilawyering. Abductive (reasoning) 05:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, and you yourself misrepresented what I did and how I did it. As for ramming things through, did you not see that I was in favour of keeping the RFC open, despite overwhelming support? Are all the others who support this (the vast majority) also trying to "ram this thing through"? I'm not sure I know what you mean by wikilawyering, but what I do know is that you have made a number of ill-founded complaints, all of which have been addressed, which leaves you (and many of the other opposition) squarely in the "I don't like it" brigade. In any case, thank you for rephrasing your comment, our trip to ANI can be delayed for the moment. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- You said nobody had a problem with the trial or its results, ignoring people's complaints--not just mine. You said that in several places, even after I pointed out that people had complaints/problems with the trial and associated fallout. You oversold constantly in an attempt to ram this awful thing down our gullets. Even now you are trying to ram this thing through with wikilawyering. Abductive (reasoning) 05:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not good enough. I want the diffs where I "repeatedly misrepresent" please. As noted above, I have repeated my opinion that the trial was a success, as have many other editors (but you don't personally attack them), but remember, success is a subjective metric in this case. If you meant "repeatedly state" then that makes a lot more sense. Otherwise you're still in WP:NPA territory and we'll sort it out the dramaboard way, as you suggested. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not good enough. That is very far from "repeatedly lying" about something. As for your final statement, yes, I believe that to be the case, just as you believe it not to be the case, it's called "opinion". But I have not accused you have "repeatedly lying". So I'll see you at ANI tomorrow morning. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- here's where I complained but you have repeatedly said that there was no problems/complaints with the trial. Abductive (reasoning) 18:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fine, then please supply me with diffs that prove that I "repeatedly lied" or I'll redact them as a personal attack. ANI is fine by me because I'm made more than reasonable attempts for you to provide evidence for you claims. You have until the end of the weekend, or I'll see you ANI myself. The Rambling Man (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Remove my comments and I'll go straight to ANI. Abductive (reasoning) 00:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, if you don't respond (and I know you've read this), then I'll remove your fallacious personal attacks, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)