| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThis article reads more like a resume than an unbiased, factual account of somebody's life. Billywhack (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I tried to clean it up a bit, but it needs a lot of work. And CITATIONS. Jbruin152 (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Billywhack. It seems this is more of a resume that promotes Guerrero in an overly positive light. It obviously ignores the negative aspects, such as the fact that there appears to be Bruin fans, alumni, and students who openly oppose Guerrero and have called for his firing (including fan blogs/communities, such as BruinReportOnline, BruinsNation, and Go Joe Bruin). It should be edited to be more neutral, or include both the positive and negative. Currahee42 (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Recent Changes
editThis article needs to be more neutral. There have been other changes that moved it in the opposite direction that have been fixed. 71.119.252.156 (talk) 04:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Relevant Material
editThere seems to be some disagreement over what's relevant to this article. There was an edit that deleted summaries of season by season performance. Seeing as how Guerrero is the Athletic Director, the performance of UCLA sports teams seems very relevant to me. The page history shows that there have been other mass deletions that have been reverted. Obviously this article isn't very good right now, but I think it would be helpful to have some sort of discussion before large portions of the article are deleted. 131.179.2.21 (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality
editWhile i support there being major section for criticism, this section does not remain neutral and reads like an op-ed. Many users seem to be adding new criticism based on their personal feelings and not actually citing any research. I wish somebody would go through and get the page cleaned up and completely unbiased, neither supporting nor criticizing him. Unfortunately, "Aint nobody got time for that" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.232.241.163 (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Neutrality
editThis entire article reads like it was written by someone who hate Dan Guererro. Saying some showed a 'lack of leadership' in the biography section is ridiculous. Insert90 (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)