76.89.124.220

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alyson Stoner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Alyson Stoner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Alyson Stoner. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from Geraldo Perez

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Alyson Stoner § Infobox Image Discussion (2021). Discuss the issue Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:76.89.124.220 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: ). Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Alyson Stoner.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• As a clear warning, if you continue to add unsourced birth dates to biography articles when this block expires, I will block your account for the same duration you've been making these disruptive WP:BLP-violating edits.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

E-girls and e-boys

There's now a discussion at Talk:E-girls and e-boys regarding the content in dispute. You should discuss the issue there instead of edit warring. clpo13_(talk) 19:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

You need to make the case on the talk page as to why this content belongs in the article, per the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle. Don't just paste it there over other people's comments. clpo13_(talk) 20:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at E-girls and e-boys.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13_(talk) 20:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Block evasion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

---