Administrative backlog
editReports
editUser-reported
edit
- Birdpiss (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Loomlovesjordanmatterschannel (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- J.Y.BProductions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- LetThereBeAUsername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TaplinkQuillbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- The3no0b (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Severe accusations not covered by RS. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: As soon as protection expires, anonymous IP edits adding un- or poorly-sourced material is added (probably by the subject) so the page goes back to looking like a resume. This has been going on for many years; please consider permanently protecting it or nominating for deletion (subject is not notable) Xblkx (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. They are changing box office backed by reliable sources several times in month. As I can't be available everytime I can't revert them right on time. Needs longer time protection. Mehedi Abedin 02:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 2 46.152.35.160 (talk) 04:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- It has already been protected, indefinately since 2020. What do you mean by 2? A number is not a reason for protection. 74.14.6.233 (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism i.e. removal of data TheProEditor11 (talk) 04:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism over several years; repeated temporary protection only stops it temporarily. Some of the edits may be well-intentioned, but they almost all come from new or inexperienced editors seeking to "cleanse" the article of blasphemy against Islam for asserting that a pre-Islamic goddess was worshipped as a wife or daughter of Allah. Similar edits are also regularly made at the companion articles Manat and Al-Uzza. Would suggest indefinite extended confirmed protection of all three, since it is apparent that the same kind of edits will be repeated as long as it is possible to do so. P Aculeius (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- If there are multiple editors who are editing in the same exact thing, then it is probably sockpuppetry. 74.14.6.233 (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's one person using sockpuppets. It's likely that some of the edits involve sockpuppetry, but while the edits are all aimed at denying that such a goddess existed or was worshipped or was regarded as the wife or daughter of Allah, or asserting that she was "fake" or a "demon", etc. they are carried out in a variety of ways, sometimes adding words, sometimes deleting them, frequently arguing through their edit summaries that what the article said prior to their edits was wrong, sometimes citing the Qur'an, sometimes not using the summary, sometimes pretending to be fixing a typo, etc. The last person was an IP editor who edited all three articles similarly; the one before that was a registered user with no other edits; the three before that were all IP's; while the page was partly protected in December it was the site of edit warring initiated by a registered user with no previous edits to other articles, who was eventually blocked with a total of 12 edits over three weeks' time. The one thing they all have in common is that they all seem to be offended by any version that neutrally describes pre-Islamic beliefs that are inconsistent with Islam, or fails to describe those beliefs as false or heretical or blasphemous. P Aculeius (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: The extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary because the autoconfirmed vandalism-only account that vandalized the page in October 2022 probably won't come back to this article. I would suggest reducing it to semi-protection or unprotecting the page entirely. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, I did not discuss with the protecting admin first. I did not see that note until after submitting this. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Owned-and-operated television stations in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: This page was semi-protected in 2013 for sockpuppetry, but I think the sockpuppet has likely been gone for years and the user who protected it has been inactive for 4 years, so I think removing the protection from the page or at least downgrade it to pending changes is necessary. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:DC19:1DFF:FEB0:A9C2 (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrollededit
Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)
Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowseredit
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights : I would like to have the AutoWikiBrowser/JavaScript Wiki Browser to make edits faster to fix redirects for the correct names of railway stations and also to make faster edits for updating adjacent stations due to the renaming of some railway services in Switzerland. Swiss512 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have autowikibrowser permissions to improve Wikipedia by fixing spelling mistakes and other similar miscellaneous edits. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to use AWB to replace raster graphics with vector graphics. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting AWB rights to fix spelling mistakes, more specifically names without accents, such as Raul Castro (Supposed to be spelt Raúl Castro) as seen in these pages Raul Castro and I often copy edit random pages and AWB would make these accent fixes and copy editing small grammar mistakes easier and more efficient, Wiiformii (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I've previously had rights to AWB, however I had them removed due to being inactive on Wikipedia. I'd like to have these rights applied again to complete edits on album articles.--Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Majash2020 (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Greetings. I previously had AWB permission, but it was revoked due to inactivity. I would like to request access to it again to continue my works. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 17:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmededit
Dear Wikipedians: I'm a Brazilian user with a good grasp in Inkscape who is looking forward to help converting some raster images from the following page to SVG: Images that should be in SVG format My main interested in that is both to contribute to Wikipedia and to get more experience with vectorial illustrations. However, I cannot upload SVG versions in those images file history because my account is not autoconfirmed (it has less than 10 edits in EN Wikipedia, even though I have more than that in PT Wikipedia). I'm asking for the "confirmed" flag because I'll probably never do 10 or more edits in EN Wikipedia articles, mainly because I have good reading skills in English, but I'm at "base level" writing in that language. Rmesrmes (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmededit
Requesting extended-confirmed for my mobile account to match my main one. Rollback & pending changes not really necessary, but would like to be able to fix errors I spot on the go. Thanks! jellyfish ✉ 03:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message senderedit
It's been a long time! I'm reaching out to request access to MMS permissions again, which were revoked due to inactivity. I'd like to continue working on my previous projects. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page revieweredit
I believe I'm capable of reviewing new articles and drafts. Check my global contributions and user rights. Though this specific user group doesn't exist on ptwiki, my first-language/native Wikipedia, I believe I have potential in helping others creating articles and filtering enwiki. I have the draftify script installed and knowledge with policies. I've been working and have created some articles, such as Sapphism, Asexual flag, Plurisexuality, and Lists of LGBT politicians, as it shows, I have interest in sexuality area, as well as lists, categories, and redirects, as shown in my edits. --MikutoH talk! 00:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work in reviewing new pages. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting NPP rights to be able to help out with reviewing new pages and to potentially help fix new pages. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request an extension of my temporary NPP rights. Though I haven't been as active as I expected, I still reviewed some articles and participated in the May drive (thanks for the barnstar). I enjoyed the experience and would like to continue helping out whenever I can. Thanks for considering my request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
I was given a two-moth extension about two months ago, and I wanted to apply now for full-time approval to be a new page reviewer. I have been active in AfDs, and, as suggested in my temporary approval last time, I have reviewed many more pages than the first two months of my reviewership. All of the AfDs I have created have spawned genuine discussion, and I have also approved several new pages that pass the standards of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. I feel as though I have done enough to earn full-time approval, but I would appreciate any approval the admins are willing to give. I enjoy this work, and I enjoy helping clean up Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Anwegmann (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to contribute to Wikipedia in good sense and review new pages which provides good information regarding to the topic Dr.AyushBhardwaj (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I have made more than 8,500 edits as an editor over a time period of around 8 months. As per my request, I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work reviewing new pages. In addition to currently serving AFC Services, I am aware of Wikipedia policies such as WP:GNG, WP:BEFORE, WP:TOOSOON, WP:SIGCOV etc. I spend a lot of time understanding Wikipedia, and overall, I have learned a lot about Wikipedia policies. Thank you with warm Regards! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page moveredit
Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
So I plan on using it to address page move vandalism and for other non-controversial tasks such as WP:RM.— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I am enough experienced for this role (as per the terms and conditions) and I will actively contribute to the community. Arigato! Wowlastic10 (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes revieweredit
I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollbackedit
Reason for requesting rollback rights: i have some experience reverting changes via Special:RecentChanges and i always warn users of reverts i make to their changes where possible, wether this be via RedWarn or via Twinkle. I think this could benefit me with reverting changes and have much less hassle with it all. JoBo Gamer (contribs) 11:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello; I had rollback until I resigned in March because of lack of need. That said, I have recently ran into situations where this right would be helpful and I would like to get back into the flow of using Huggle and related tools again. Cheers, Queen of Hearts talk 23:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC) |