This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@IceWelder: The article clearly meets the notability criteria for people:
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
All sources are reliable, independent and give significant coverage, except for #1 (interview), and #13 doesn't give significant coverage. All the other ones (19 sources) give notability. You might question the reability of the Portuguese-language sources, but as a Portuguese Wikipedia sysop I can confirm they are reliable too. Also, I think the coverage he got for "fixing one of the SNES biggest issues" (as described by some sources) can be considered "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field". Skyshiftertalk19:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I applied the tag because, seemingly, the only in-depth coverage comes from a non-independent source (#1), while the rest is trivial/routine coverage for various projects by Vilela (see WP:RUNOFTHEMILL), not in-depth coverage of Vilela himself. Notability requires in-depth coverage from multiple independent sources (see the summary at WP:42). If another reviewer disagrees with my assessment, I won't object to them removing the tag. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 19:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply