Talk:Victoria 3

The Reception section should have something in it

While the semi-protected status of the amical is more then reasonable to avid vandalism, to leave the reception section completely blank is not reasonable. There should be something written there. It dose not have to violate neutral point of view it could say something like since the changes to the war system where announced it has received criticism from some who see it as unfaithful to the mechanics of previous Victoria games. and Others retort by saying that the changes to the war mechanics are historically accurate to the Victorian ear or something like that. Roma enjoyer (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

This info must be supported by WP:RS in order for it to be added. Veverve (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

it should be noted in the article however that the Game received mixed reviews from the public according to Steam's aggregated score. The restriction on user-generated content is quite clearly intended in the case of referencing specific blog posts on a topic etc. whereas Steam takes in to account ALL users. Navy Groundhog (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

No, WP:UGS concerns all types of user-generated content. Veverve (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)