Talk:The Trevor Project

Latest comment: 10 days ago by TheSpacebook in topic Discussion notice

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 5 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cappiahkubi. Peer reviewers: P.salas95.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Include the phone number? edit

For most articles I do not see much point to including a contact phone number, but given that this is a crisis hotline it makes sense. The whole point of the organization is for people to call, which would seem to make the number relevant. Would anyone mind if I were to add a sentence along the lines of The Trevor Project may be reached at 866-4-U-Trevor (866-488-7386). to the end or the lead paragraph or a note in the External links section? The infobox does not have a phone number entry, but I could create a new template if there is interest in that. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately addding the phone no. would not be within policy (see WP:NOTDIR). That's why there is no "telephone" field in the infobox. Lionel (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
To play devil's advocate here (and personally, I could argue this either way, but heck, I'm up for a friendly debate), NOTDIR is not, I believe, a blanket prohibition on the inclusion of phone numbers within articles, but a statement that in general phone numbers are not encyclopedic. The latter framing allows that a phone number might be encyclopedic for other reasons. For example, "411" and "555-1212" are, in my view, encyclopedic at directory assistance.
Now, there's obviously a difference between 411 and 1-866-4-U-TREVOR, but what is the test of whether a number is encyclopedic? If news outlets that would normally not include the number within articles about the subject makes a point of including it (e.g., [1],[2] does that affect the test? I don't have a great answer for the Trevor number, but I do think we could make an argument for the number here without setting a precedent for completely abandoning NOTDIR. --je deckertalk 18:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add the number. 216.189.186.52 (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would support adding the telephone number in this instance and would agree that it is encyclopedic Ddosguru (talk) 06:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Trevor Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion edit

I'm against deletion.—‎Lost Whispers talk 05:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Lost Whispers: The deletion discussion is this way. Whoever closes it may or may not see your comment here. RivertorchFIREWATER 14:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Rivertorch: thanks! *poof*'—‎Lost Whispers talk 14:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Trevor Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

The Trevor Project's logo has changed recently, and the Wikipedia article has not been updated to reflect this. There is also no copy of the current logo on Commons, and one should be added. andritolion (talk) 04:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've updated the logo after posting the previous talk page message. Thank you WP:Discord (special thanks to User:SuperHamster) for helping me learn more about uploading to Wikimedia Commons and about how the threshold of originality can help with uploading logos to Commons. andritolion (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: The Editing Process edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JohRog (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by JohRog (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editing the Labor Union Controversy edit

Many folks are currently following the labor union controversy involving Trevor. I added it to the article with secondary sources, and I'll try to monitor this event for updates. However, I'd appreciate any updates that folks can make, as we find out more about what's going on! Also, I'm super sad about this, but I worked super hard to maintain neutrality during the writing process -- very much relied up X said this and Y said this to keep neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkinspyce (talkcontribs) 03:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Discussion notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) regarding the use of suicide crisis telephone numbers (which this article includes). The thread is Suicide hotlines. Thank you. TheSpacebook (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply