External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Chaos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Chaos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Susy ? edit

I read that the dedicacee of this poem, referred to as just "Susy" in the fifth line, has been tentatively identified as a "Suzanne Delacruix", which name appears in manuscript on a Roneotyped version of the poem. I wonder is this not a misreading of the much more common surname "Delacroix". "Delacroix" gives "About 13,700,000 results" in a Google search, "Delacruix" only 527, including references to "The Chaos".

Franciscus montmartinensis (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Possible but hard to say, and unless we find confirmation in secondary sources, not our place to second guess a MS. – SJ + 15:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio ? edit

Hello Cwmhiraeth : according to the log, and if I'm not mistaken, you've deleted the whole poem from the article's history as copyvio. But the very same poem is on wikisource, because the author died in 1946, so it's in the public domain? Note that I don't argue for the presence of the full poem (better on wikisource anyway, there's already a link), but could you maybe un-delete the revisions, so as to keep the full history accessible? Best regards, Esprit Fugace (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Someone else is at liberty to replace it if they think fit. I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about its copyright status and prefer to err on the side of caution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The original version is in the public domain, but we can't use longer versions published after 1927. See wikisource:Wikisource:Copyright discussions/Archives/2017#The Chaos. Nardog (talk) 06:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

What about a phonological transcription? edit

Is this Wikipedia article the appropriate place to have the poem side by side with a phonological transcription of it? It would be quite illustrative and benefit the reader. I volunteer to do it myself consulting the Wiktionary if it's permissible. FlavianusEP (talk) 13:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would think that would be WP:OR, and inappropriate. If such a transcription had already been published, it would be good to link to it as an External Link. PamD 16:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply