Talk:SciLands

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

I'm in the process of gathering the necessary background, press links, appropriate organization information, images, etc. Any assistance is greatly appreciated!

Not likely. This organization fails notability guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Reviewing notability guidelines now to see if I can change your mind. Hackshaven (Talk to me) —Preceding comment was added at 22:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

Hackshaven (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should SciLands Senate Blogs be combined with External Links? Hackshaven (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:DUlogo1.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deprod

edit

I am deprodding because notability is not temporary, per WP:NTEMP. That is, just because an organization no longer exists does not mean that it doesn't continue to be notable, e.g., the Roman empire. The Technology Review article and physicsworld.com article are sufficient claims of notability that prod is no longer uncontroversial. --Mark viking (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SciLands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply