Talk:Revenant (video game)
Untitled edit
I work with Ben "the boss" now :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.5.115.169 (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Untitled edit
I added the 3 paragraphs (not story). I'm a bit tired to edit the text now. Polishing will come later
- Thank you very much! I've corrected the style a bit and wikified the page. Keep the good work up, please. :) --Koveras
15:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
I worked on this game from its early concept.. Really it was made in a small company with just a few guys. Towards the end there were maybe 20 total employees (art, coding, and business). It was rushed, at the end but it probably was because the graphics and stuff were re-done a few times. At one time on the net there was a page from a fan who got to go to the office and take pictures. I wonder if that's still online.
edit: http://www.citilink.com/~rmc/rev/visit/visit.htm
Nostalgia. I remember that guy coming over to visit us in the office on Alma School in Mesa. No pictures of me on that site though, which is probably a good thing as I had gotten pretty chubby eating all the Pizza. - BenC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.5.115.169 (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Revenant-Locke.jpg edit
Image:Revenant-Locke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Can someone get that dick's gamefaq review out of the problems section edit
Geezus christ, and you all want to be taken seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.166.52 (talk) 03:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree, the low quality of writing in that one section disgusts me. 24.8.88.84 (talk) 03:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't think calling the author of a part of an article a "dick" is very helpful, but I agree that it reads more like a review than an encyclopedia article. 209.213.9.125 (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
The game's instability edit
Does anybody know of a way to mention the game's unstable codebase in the main article without sounding biased? I first heard of this game through Ross's Game Dungeon, and I've included a link to the video review in question so that you can see the instability of which I am referring to. (Be warned, the review itself does contain bias.)
Thank you for reading, any feedback or response would be appreciated. Lycanphoenix (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Source edit
Source edit
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990427235119/http://www.next-generation.com:80/jsmid/news/4929.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20000817193336/http://www.gamecenter.com:80/News/Item/0,3,0-1074,00.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20010408030055/http://www.avault.com:80/news/displaynews.asp?story=10201999-55214
- https://web.archive.org/web/20000311092601/http://headline.gamespot.com/news/97_07/14_eidos/index.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20000226034813/http://headline.gamespot.com/news/97_08/20_forsak/index.html