Talk:Manor Lords
Latest comment: 7 days ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic De-wp deletion
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
 | A fact from Manor Lords appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 14:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that although Manor Lords was developed by only one person, it became the most-wishlisted game on Steam by the month of its release? Source: Jones and Serin 2024
- ALT1: ... that the video game Manor Lords received more than two million wishlists on Steam after its developer had estimated it would receive around 14,000? Source: Livingston 2024
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Philomena Franz
Created by AirshipJungleman29 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Present Tense update edit
Updated for present tense as of game release on April 26, 2024, 13:00GMT. Sesadre (talk) 14:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
De-wp deletion edit
De-wp has deleted the German language Version of this article. Why? 2001:A62:1473:7902:CFC:B27A:316E:627C (talk) 19:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reasoning is given on that page. Different Wikipedias function by different rules, so I cannot say if the deletion was justified. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand it correctly, they do not argue that no article should exist but that what was there did not meet some vaguely defined "minimum requirements". What those are, they seem unwilling to tell even after repeated inquiry... 2001:A62:14BF:1302:CFC:B27A:316E:627C (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I presume they felt the article did not meet de:Wikipedia:Richtlinien Computerspiele. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- what would an article look like that does? 2001:A62:14C2:4902:CFC:B27A:316E:627C (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Update: The article has been re-created but again nominated for deletion. 2001:A62:14C2:4902:71D9:41E5:E99A:30ED (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- They seem to focus upon the lack of sources in the "Spielprinzip" section and the poorly-formatted citations. Would suggest fixing those issues if you want the article to be kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I presume they felt the article did not meet de:Wikipedia:Richtlinien Computerspiele. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand it correctly, they do not argue that no article should exist but that what was there did not meet some vaguely defined "minimum requirements". What those are, they seem unwilling to tell even after repeated inquiry... 2001:A62:14BF:1302:CFC:B27A:316E:627C (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)