This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Do we really need a nominee page? They didn't win, the winners are dulicated. A lot are red links. Surely only the winners are notible as they won (on the main page), those nominated that have their own articles (authors or publication) would have it in their article. Sciencefish (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think nominees are also notable. They were good enough or popular enough to get nominated out of pools of thousands of other possible works eligible for the given year. That's one person's opinion. Create a template (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I clearly think it's worth keeping a complete list of the nominees, given the amount of time I've spent updating the page. Authors/creators who become widely-known often start by being nominated for awards like this, so I think the red links indicate authors who may some day be worth writing a page for. e.g. George R.R. Martin was first nominated for a Hugo in 1974. (Of course, some people get nominated once and then disappear.) The Dragons are certainly a second-tier award compared to the Hugos, Nebulas, Clarke, Seiuns, etc., but they belong to one of the largest US conventions, so they seem to me like a noteworthy snapshot of US fandom. Andrew Kuchling (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The page currently has symbols and colours to indicate declined nominations, but we don't have anything discussing why people declined the nomination or why people might do this in general. This is confusing and should be discussed on the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 19:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
