Talk:Good Faith Collaboration
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic DYK nomination
 | A fact from Good Faith Collaboration appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New book edit
This is a published book; I checked Amazon and it is available print and on Kindle: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=good++faith+collaboration&x=0&y=0
I also checked the author of the article; I think this article is legitimate but needs a lot of work to flesh out. I haven't read the book so someone else will have to step up.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusty relic (talk • contribs) 06:29, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Japanese translation should be added. edit
http://good-faith-collaboration-ja.github.io/ -Reagle (talk) 13:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Good Faith Collaboration has been described as a pioneering ethnographic study of the culture of Wikipedia? Source: "In its switch to social norms and from an ethnographic approach, Reagle's book is a trail blazer, particularly in terms of its cultural and historical specificity" [1]
- Reviewed: Edward J. O’Donnell (military)
5x expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 11:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Neutrality: some non-NPOV statements have been removed from the article. Sourcing suggestion: it is good academic practice when citing quotations to give their exact page number in books or multi-page articles (use {{rp}}). Nevertheless, good to go! ~ RLO1729💬 05:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)