Talk:Brute Force (video game)

Article expansion edit

I've expanded the article quite a bit, but I think I left some spelling/grammer mistakes, if someonr could just go through and fix them iy would be greatly appriciated, also it would be good to have a more compleat story sectionShadoom1 07:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


"Hawk (a sexy-ass bitch with a large round ass and enormous, oversized tits) is suited to stealth"

Hardly Wikipedia quality level...

Heros/Bosses edit

Should the Leader bad guys be called Heros or Bosses, I prefer Boses as the only game that refers to them as Heros is Star Wars battle frount 2 Shadoom1 08:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The enemy leaders section should really be deleted as per policy. Ong elvin 14:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Boses, lol audio edit

Brute force is one of the worst games of all time, lets get some documentation on that. This is the ATARI pacman of the Xbox


i like brute force and dont biaserate this articleDappled Sage 02:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

If your the one who thinks its a bad game, why don't you find some refrences for it? Shadoom 23:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brute Force (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:VG Article reassessment (24 September 2023) edit

This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.

Category Flag Comments
Overall   The article generally meets the form of the manual of style but has minor issues, such as gaps in its content or missing elements, or requires greater editing to assist in clarity, balance and flow.
Layout  Y The article has a layout with sections that conforms to all the foundational sections of the manual of style.
Lead section    The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox  Y The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay  Y The article contains an accessible description of gameplay that minimizes jargon and avoids excessive trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art  Y The article contains a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot    The article contains a plot section that may have issues, such as being incomplete or having excessive length, or an inappropriate tone.
Development  Y The article contains a development section that is focused on the design and release of the game.
Reception    The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia.
Sources  Y The article's content is consistently sourced by several independent reliable secondary sources that are cited correctly.

VRXCES (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply