Talk:Blazer Drive

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The DS game?

edit

I'm wondering why there isn't a section on the game in the article, apart from the small mention in the intro? Jutari (talk) 10:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chapter Table

edit

There probably isn't a need for a chapter-by-chapter plot summary table. - Sutecha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.162.205 (talk) 07:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think this article should keep it's chapter by chapter summaries. I would suggest splitting it from the main article, but the main article itself isn't too detailed or expanded, so leave it on there for now. ~ Hyakurei (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't even split it from the main article. Besides, I've never seen a manga page with chapter by chapter summaries. Blazer Drive can easily be summarized in a few paragraphs. The information could also be used to expand the characters' biographies. Since Blazer Drive is a new series, there isn't much to say. Expanding the page with detailed and wordy summaries does not make the page look more professional.
But if you are going to keep it, at least clean up the summaries. They're extremely wordy, repetitive, and opinionated. - Sutecha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.162.205 (talk) 03:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Plot,Qilin,Character

edit

The plot is incomplete,no info for Qilin, and no info for new characters. Can anyone help to edit it (My info is too little and not enough)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucky u (talkcontribs) 08:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Split and Expand

edit

This article needs to be split, and at least have it's own charachter and chapter sections. The plot is one big chunk, and can be made better. We can expand this article further, and add references also. I'll try working on this, but please feel free to do so yourself and help out. ~ Hyakurei (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Splitting seems very premature. For readers (instead of editors and fans), having all the information in one place is far better. This should only be split if it gets very long. Don't be impressed by other series with many very poor pages, having one comprehensive page will get more views (subpages always get very small numbers of reader - if the plot is moved to a sub-page, almost no-one will click on the link.)
Also, the series is quite new, and at least one sub-page was already nominated for deletion, resulkting in it being merged back. (the table of Mystickers) - splitting article too early without enough references might result in the same happening to other split articles. IT is better to find references and expand this article - until it reached 50 Kb of readable text, there is no need to split (it is now only 12 Kb text).Yobmod (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Splinting of the character section has been done and modified to be more wiki friendly As the chapter list builds there will be a requirement sooner or later to make the page so why not do it now especially since Seishi unlike his brother likes to fit atleast 2 to 3 events in every chapter-76.21.106.232 (talk) 07:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

A split has been done so the tag has been removed. SilkTork *YES! 11:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Description of Mysticker abilities

edit

Is it just me, or does the list of Mysticker abilities seem to have a lot of descriptions based on situations that are too specific to be demonstrative of use in any context than what's been shown?I don't think "End of World"'s real purpose would be to propel people forward ._. Additionally, it might not be necessary for the silver beads used to be piercings, so such an ability should be qualified as being only in the case of Shuga (as some of the others are).

Also, Jimmy's named abilities should be displayed in the same way as the others, if a standardized version can be come up with. Not changing anything, though, mostly because I'm not sure if I should, and also that I don't really have the time. It's a nice series, anyways :3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.75.53.22 (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blazer Drive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blazer Drive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply