Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards/OAK/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Buidhe

WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves for: Buidhe has produced four FAs and an FL of impeccable quality, focusing on the difficult topic of the Holocaust and the persecution of Jews. And 42 GAs with a broader range but the same central theme. In addition they somehow find time to be the Project's premier source and image reviewer; I dread to think where the Project members' throughput of A class and Featured articles would be without their work. An example to us all and in my opinion they meet the high bar for this award and would be a deserving and worthy recipient. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Hawkeye7, Indy beetle, Parsecboy, and Sturmvogel 66: A reminder for coordinators who have not yet voted. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support Absolutely. Buidhe works in a difficult area, and putting together high quality articles on the Holocaust is very important for the encyclopaedia. Her image and source reviews are also of great benefit for the project's throughout. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support, I am amazed at the number of image/source reviews she gets through, with excellent content work on top of that! Zawed (talk) 09:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support -- good nom, well deserved in all respects (pedantry: shouldn't the nominee name appear as a bold subheader as in the ACM noms?) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

  Ian Rose, yes, it should, but I couldn't make it happen. If anyone knows how to do it that could be my Wiki-lesson for today. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

  Yeah, I had a look at the template parameters before and I couldn't see anything obvious -- Hawkeye? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support - Well deserved. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Comment - I may not be a coord so I won't support since I don't think it would and could be counted. But I'm still in favour of awarding this award. Her work in those controversial eras and locations and her image/source reviews are absolutely, a way of caring, for this community and deserve something important and big to respect her work. I hope we'd get more well-respected people like her in the near future. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support per all above, truly stellar work in a controversial area, as well as high quality reviews and helpful collaboration. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support, well deserved. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 19:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support - per many of the above comments. Parsecboy (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support A worthy recipient. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@WP:MILHIST coordinators: This nomination seems to have received "support from a majority of the current coordinator tranche". Can I suggest that it is closed and that Peacemaker make the award on behalf of the project? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

I agree, but it is traditional for the nominator to do the honours. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Awarded. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Kges1901

• WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves for: I've just had the pleasure of reviewing Mikhail Seryugin, primarily written up by Kges1901. I would like to again mark the efforts and achievements of Kges1901 for his continuing work on Red Army and Soviet Armed Forces subjects, especially biographies. (awarded) Buckshot06 (talk) 08:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Supported Kges1901 has made a truly significant contribution to Red Army and Soviet Armed Forces articles, some of which I have had the pleasure of reviewing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Worked with me on Soviet and Russian ships as well.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support - Good work on some ACW topics, as well. Hog Farm _Talk 03:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support – Consistently good work. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support. Gog the Mild (talk)
  • Support, of course - Kges has a long record of churning out high quality content. Parsecboy (talk) 11:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support TomStar81 (Talk) 07:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Zawed (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Wreck Smurfy

• WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves for: This editor is near-tirelessly working through creating detailed divisional histories of large numbers of Red Army Second World War rifle divisions, greatly contributing to making this material accessible beyond those who can afford to buy expensive library subscriptions or books such as those by David Glantz. (awarded) Buckshot06 (talk) 08:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Supported Wreck Smurfy has also made significant contributions to the encyclopaedia in respect of Red Army divisions. Well done! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support. A much neglected topic.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support per above. Hog Farm _Talk 03:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support always nice to see people working away on non-English language topics. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support. Gog the Mild (talk)
  • Support, especially per Sturm and Harrias. Parsecboy (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Support TomStar81 (Talk) 07:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Zawed (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Peacemaker67

WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves for: For long and dedicated service to the project, including 4 terms as lead coordinator. (awarded) Hog Farm _Talk 18:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

1. Support as nominator. Hog Farm _Talk 18:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
2. Absolutely! Well-deserved, and tks HF for the nomination. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
3. For a project mainstay. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
4. Concur. Zawed (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
5. Support. A worthy recipient. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
6. Definitely. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 08:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
7. Absolutely. Richly deserved and hard earned. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
8. Yes. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 03:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
9. Well deserved and absolutely inspiring. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
10. Support Schierbecker (talk) 19:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

G'day all, thanks so much for the nomination, Hog Farm, and thank you all the new (and old) coords who supported it and made comments. It is greatly appreciated. Warm regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hog Farm

WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves for: Hog Farm is the name in the English Wikipedia's coverage of the American Civil War, with dozens on dozens of articles of quality, and has devoted years of his time and energy to the coordination and maintenance of MILHIST. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC) (awarded)

• Support As nominator. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
• For sure! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Well deserved. A tireless, dynamic and prolific contributor. Donner60 (talk) 02:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support fantastic work, and great commitment as a coord over the last three years. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 15:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
• Hell yes! Gog the Mild (talk) 15:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support No doubt. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)