Accepted The Artifice Girl at 2023-11-01T21:16:40Z (diff; had been pending for 116 days)
Pass Obviously meets notability guidelines and has plenty of refs. It could use some cleanup but that's not a job for AFC. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Draft:Agri Sena at 2023-11-02T03:40:24Z (diff; corp; had been pending for 94 days)
Fail Should have been declined additionally for "unreliable sourcing", or it should have at least been mentioned in the comment. Arguably, this is equally as pressing as an issue as the notability. As a reviewer, we should be trying to guide drafts in the best way we can. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 00:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PerfectSoundWhatever, thanks for taking a second look but this is not worthy of a fail. The article had plenty of citations. AFC is not cleanup. Per WP:AFCPURPOSE, we should be evaluating drafts on whether or not they will survive an AFD. In this case, notability was properly assessed based on the lack of SIGCOV in the listed sources. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PerfectSoundWhatever:, I am puzzled at this as well. The decline was not proper because I only declined it for notability? The templates used with the declines (there were two total) says "...about the subject in published, reliable [emphasis added], secondary sources that are independent of the subject..." with a clickable link. It would not be a reviewers job to go through 11 sources and determine if they are reliable when they are not the sources that are needed in the first place. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can strike my fail if multiple editors disagree with the re-review. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Draft:Saina Play at 2023-11-05T07:40:02Z (diff; bio; had been pending for 0 days)
Declined Draft:Aedifica at 2023-11-05T07:52:04Z (diff; corp; had been pending for 61 days)
