Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 September 14

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 13 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 14

edit

01:21:40, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Gamabog

edit


(talk) 01:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC) I am asking about the copyright, the source I gave you of the article "Ofato Alew Biography' "www.gambellastarnews.com", I am the owner of the website source and I am the author of the source. why can't I use it as a reference?[reply]

07:11:35, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Looplips

edit

today i randomly checking this draft has citations using YouTube and Instagram posts, is that correct Looplips (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:46:45, 14 September 2020 review of draft by EricLewan

edit


Hello, I would like to request some help regarding this article. This is the largest sparkling wine producer in Eastern Europe and I think it definitely should have a page on English Wikipedia, although I'm not entirely sure where does the article look promotional or missing any significant references. The information was mostly taken from the Ukrainian Wikipedia page and the articles from the press and the official website of the winery. Can you advice what needs to be changed?

EricLewan (talk) 08:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EricLewan As noted by the reviewer, the draft is not sourced to independent reliable sources with significant coverage. Press releases and other information from the company itself do not establish notability as Wikipedia defines a notable company. Each language version of Wikipedia is its own project with its own editors and policies, and what is acceptable on one version is not necessarily acceptable here(assuming the Ukrainian version is in keeping with their policies). 331dot (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:47:06, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Pradyumn444

edit


Could I get some feedback on why my article was deleted and what should be done to move through this process? I believe it has appropriate references, is formatted correctly, and meets notability criteria.

Pradyumn444 (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has not been deleted; it is pending review. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I meant that the article on the Aradhna Dayal page was deleted and moved to my drafts.

Pradyumn444 You seem to have a conflict of interest, as such, you should not directly create the article, but instead submit it for review by an independent editor first. I strongly suggest that you move the article back to Draft and do so. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:15:46, 14 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Preshtha Kalsyan

edit


Hi Team, I need my contributions on Prysm, Inc. & Sandiip Kapur to be Live on the Wikipedia page. Please help.


Preshtha Kalsyan (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Preshtha Kalsyan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Preshtha Kalsyan: Thank you for your declaration.
The company website is not an independent source. Crunchbase is mostly user-generated, so not a reliable source (see WP:RS/PS). PR Newswire is a press release, so not independent. The Statesman is a shallow list of search results, so not a valid source. You could fix that fairly easily by deep linking to the single result, but that story is another press release, so not independent. TechPoint has no reputation for accuracy and fact checking. Its directory-listing blurb about the company appears to have been written by the company, so not independent.
Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant information about their subject. The draft cites zero. In theory you could fix the problem by finding such sources, throwing away the draft, and starting over from scratch. In practice, such sources almost never exist for a company like this, so the topic is almost certainly doomed. Since you're not getting paid to write about it, move on to a topic that has some chance of being published. Articles about existing companies, their products, founders, and CEOs have very low acceptance rates, so avoid those areas if you want to be successful. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:19:05, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Preshtha Kalsyan

edit


Hi Team, My contributions are lying in the current status for two months. Please guide to get them published.


Preshtha Kalsyan (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:31:04, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Preshtha Kalsyan

edit


Preshtha Kalsyan (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Preshtha Kalsyan: Neither of your both drafts has been submitted for review, so nobody looks at them. If you want to submit them for review, you can add {{subst:submit}} to the top of them. If you copy it from here, please make sure that you copy it as it appears when you view the page. If I should look at a specific Draft in more detail, tell me which. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:58:04, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Shannon Rawlins

edit


I cannot figure out how to submit this article for review - I added the code to submit it at the top of the page but no yellow box saying 'review waiting, please be patient' has appeared. How do I submit it to be reviewed?

Shannon Rawlins (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shannon Rawlins: submitted on your behalf. In future, yust add {{subst:submit}} to the top and *save the page* Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:23:00, 14 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Pianoyeah

edit


Hello there. I would like some support on the submission I have just made. It says that there needs to be more secondary sources. I was wondering how many sources is a good number and how I should be amending it.

Thank you


Pianoyeah (talk) 11:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commonly three reliable independent sources with some coverage. Note that this the absolute minimum, the longer your article is, the more you will need. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:37:07, 14 September 2020 review of submission by 12.195.158.2

edit

Please create Enrique Odria Sotomayor 12.195.158.2 (talk) 14:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done. Try Wikipedia:Requested articles, but the possibility of an article ebing created via that venue is probbably pretty close to zero. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:07:36, 14 September 2020 review of submission by SouthernCharm10!

edit


Hello, I am looking for advice on my article. I was rejected due to not complying with Wikipedia but I went ahead and before I created the article I made sure to follow the five pillars of Wikipedia but it looks like I still was in contrary to Wikipedias purpose. If there is someone who can help me review my article so I may help post useful information to the users of Wikipedia.

Thank you! SouthernCharm10! (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SouthernCharm10! What you wrote was a clear advertisement for the school. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, it summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Wikipedia has no interest in what a subject wants to say about itself.
If you work for the school, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing for disclosures you may be required to make. 331dot (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:10:58, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Vatsal0506

edit


I want to contribute to wikipedia for the reason of improving my writing skills while writing about things that I know about. I am not allowed to create or edit any big pages so I decided to create a list of restaurants of a small country and populate information on all restaurants. Please let me know how I can contribute better! The article I have written does not sound promotional at all. I have tried to keep it as unbiased as possible. Therefore I request you to reconsider the deltion.

Vatsal0506 (talk) 19:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 19:13:42, 14 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by LDobbs

edit


Hi, I'm sorry, this is clinical info about the treatment side effects that should not be rewritten per se. I have permission from the company to pick up verbatim - can I submit that permission to you? The medical director is a bit insistent about not straying from their fda-approved language about side effects... Can you please copy / send me the exact copy that you are objecting to and I can see what I can do to make it less of a direct pick up while still appeasing the FDA & the medical director.

LDobbs (talk) 19:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ldobbs The reviewers left the comments you are seeking on your draft. The company cannot grant you permission, the text must already be under an appropriate license that allows for its use on Wikipedia. It is possible for them to donate copyrighted materials- see WP:DCP- but the company may not wish to do that once they learn what doing so means(I might not want to if I were them). Wikipedia primarily summarizes what independent reliable sources state. 331dot (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:01:08, 14 September 2020 review of draft by Green red tan

edit


I am brand new to Wikipedia so I'm sorry if I don't know all of the rules. I am trying to publish a Wikipedia page for Theresa Greenfield, the Democratic Senate candidate in Iowa. She is not just a candidate at this point, as she has won the primary election, and has received very significant media coverage. Please let me know what other information is needed so that voters can be informed this upcoming election.

Thanks!

Green red tan (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green red tan Winning a primary only means she was chosen as the nominee, she is still technically only a candidate until she wins the election. Most coverage of her is due to the election in progress; to merit an article now she needs to be shown as notable for something else, or that coverage of her is so widespread and extensive that she meets WP:GNG(an example of this rare thing is Christine O'Donnell). I personally have not seen such a high level of sustained, nationwide coverage of Greenfield. I think we will need to wait to see if she wins(she would merit an article once it is determined that she won) 331dot (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would add that Wikipedia is not intended as a voter guide. 331dot (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for the feedback 331dot, it is very helpful. I added several national news sources that cover Greenfield specifically, such as Vox and The Hill. How many do you think would be necessary to meet the burden of sustained nationwide coverage? Thanks again! Green red tan (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Christine O'Donnell merited an article because there was constant, sustained coverage of her campaign and political views, not only in the Delaware area but nationally. I recall she was close to top headline news for awhile(because she was running against then Sen. Biden combined with her Tea Party views). I'm not seeing that with Greenfield. Certainly that is just my opinion and you (and others) are free to disagree and resubmit your draft- but I can only tell you what I think. 331dot (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:51:57, 14 September 2020 review of submission by Dvanrijn

edit

My article was rejected because of lack of references. My research on this small town consisted of interviews and with local publications done in the area. I believe the entry into Wikipedia will be of benefit for anyone doing research on small towns in the Illinois. Dvanrijn (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dvanrijn, while your draft article is quite interesting, as the reviewer of your draft said, what you have written is more in the style of an essay than an encyclopedia article, and if your article is based on research you have done in the form of interviews then what you have done seems to constitute original research, which Wikipedia doesn't host. Wikipedia needs all information in the articles to be verified by reference to published sources, and although you have listed some references at the bottom of the article only the first one gives an indication that it was published. You might want to read over Help:Referencing for beginners for a guide to what standards of referencing Wikipedia requires. If you have done some original research that you would like to record for the benefit of future scholars then Wikipedia isn't a good place to try and publish this.Pi (Talk to me!) 04:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_September_14&oldid=985276120"